Elsevier

Advances in Water Resources

Volume 119, September 2018, Pages 125-141
Advances in Water Resources

Longitudinal dispersion in heterogeneous layered porous media during stable and unstable pore-scale miscible displacements

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.06.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Numerical simulations are carried out to model longitudinal dispersion at pore-scale.

  • Longitudinal dispersion coefficient is discovered to be a function of heterogeneity and layering.

  • Different dispersion regimes are identified based on the range of the Peclet number.

  • Scale-dependency of dispersion is governed by the layering configuration and viscosity ratio.

Abstract

Dispersion and mixing of fluids during miscible displacement in porous media are known to be strongly affected by heterogeneity and viscous fingering. In this study, direct pore-level numerical simulations are employed to model flow and solute transport during both stable and unstable miscible displacements in two-dimensional packings of circular grains. Longitudinal dispersion coefficients are then computed by fitting the numerically obtained concentration profiles to the analytical solution of the convection-dispersion equation. We observed that diffusive, mixed diffusive-advective, and mechanical dispersion regimes are present during stable displacements whereas the middle diffusive-advective regime is absent in unstable displacements due to the evolution of viscous fingers. Viscous fingering also increases the longitudinal dispersion coefficient several orders of magnitude compared to the stable displacement. The results reveal that the scale-dependency of longitudinal dispersion is a function of layering direction and viscosity contrast. During stable displacement in porous domains with no layering or with the layering perpendicular to the displacement direction, the longitudinal dispersion coefficient increases along the length of flow until it reaches an asymptotic value. When layering is in the direction of displacement, however, the scale-dependency behavior is a function of the layering pattern. In unstable displacements, however, longitudinal dispersion always exhibits an asymptotic behavior. Finally, it is observed that the effect of heterogeneity and layering on the magnitude of the longitudinal dispersion coefficient diminishes as viscosity ratio increases to higher adverse values.

Introduction

The dynamics of mixing and transport of solute in porous media is the major focus of subsurface transport studies in groundwater hydrology and miscible recovery of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Mixing and dispersion in pore space is the combined result of molecular diffusion and convective spreading. Molecular diffusion is the transport of solute particles due to a concentration gradient, whereas convective spreading arises from the fluctuations of velocity field inside the porous media. These variations in the velocity magnitude and direction cause the solute particles to travel different paths with different velocities within a porous medium, thus, generating concentration contrasts. This mechanism increases the size of the concentration front and provides a large surface area for molecular diffusion. It is the enhanced mass transfer by molecular diffusion across this enlarged concentration front that makes convective spreading irreversible and contributes to the true mixing (Dentz and Le Borgne, 2011). If there is no molecular diffusion, convective spreading is a reversible phenomenon and only leads to apparent mixing (Jha et al., 2009). The process of mixing that occurs during solute transport in pore-scale is usually described as hydrodynamic dispersion in macroscale and can be quantified by dispersion coefficient. Dispersion coefficient (K¯) is a tensor quantity that measures the degree of mixing which originates from both diffusion and convective spreading. Experimental measurements of the longitudinal dispersion coefficient (KL, the diagonal component of K¯ along the general direction of flow) are usually carried out using breakthrough experiments (Correa et al., 1990; Jiao and Hötzl, 2004; Arya et al., 1988; Bretz et al., 1988), NMR spectroscopy (Seymour and Callaghan, 1997; Stapf and Packer, 1998; Lebon et al., 1997), and particle tracking velocimetry (Moroni and Cushman, 2001). An alternative approach is to numerically calculate KL using digital core analysis. Digital core analysis enables us to describe the detailed properties of a porous medium at the pore-scale (micro/nano scale) and calculate KL at the macroscale. It can be achieved by the numerical simulation of flow and transport in a pore-scale digital representation of a porous medium. Several authors have used different methods to simulate dispersion in various types of porous media. For instance, some authors (Yao et al., 1997; Rolle and Kitanidis, 2014; Mostaghimi et al., 2012; Bijeljic et al., 2011; Maier et al., 2000; Maier et al., 2003; Salles et al., 1993; Sallès et al., 1993; Coelho et al., 1997) have used stochastically reconstructed models to represent porous media during dispersion simulation while others (Bijeljic et al., 2004; Bruderer and Bernabé, 2001; Bruderer-Weng et al., 2004; Makse et al., 2000; Koplik et al., 1988; de Arcangelis L et al., 1986; Babaei and Joekar-Niasar, 2016) solved the flow and transport equations in the extracted equivalent pore networks of porous media.

Dispersion coefficient magnitude during solute transport in porous media strongly depends on the mechanisms that augment convective spreading and enhance diffusion. This includes viscous fingering and the variations of the velocity field due to the medium's structural heterogeneity (Nicolaides et al., 2015). When there is an adverse viscosity ratio, hydrodynamic instabilities will develop at the concentration front. The resulting viscous fingers increase the size of concentration front and generate sharp concentration gradients due to the stretching, steepening, and tip-splitting mechanisms (Tan and Homsy, 1988). Both experimental (Jiao and Hötzl, 2004; Brigham et al., 1961) and Darcy-scale numerical (Connolly and Johns, 2016; Johns and Garmeh, 2010) studies have shown that the additional mixing caused by the enhanced molecular diffusion at this perturbed concentration front results in a larger dispersion coefficient. Some authors (Jha et al., 2013; Jha et al., 2011a; Jha et al., 2011b), however, argued that at high adverse viscosity ratios, flow focusing across the flow domain due to the channeling of less viscous fluid slows down the creation of additional interface by tip-splitting and hinders mixing. In heterogeneous porous media, the presence of microscale (i.e. nonuniform distribution of shape and size of pores and throats) and macroscale (i.e. layering) heterogeneity creates some preferred paths for flow inside the media and gives rise to a nonuniform velocity distribution. It makes the leading edge of the concentration front disordered and introduces additional mixing. Previous laboratory measurements and numerical studies have demonstrated that an increase in the variance of pore size distribution (Bretz et al., 1988), complexity of the pore structure (Brigham et al., 1961), Dykstra–Parsons coefficient of permeability fields (Arya et al., 1988; Connolly and Johns, 2016; Johns and Garmeh, 2010; Adepoju et al., 2013), permeability variance (John et al., 2010), and longitudinal correlation length of permeability (Arya et al., 1988; Johns and Garmeh, 2010; John et al., 2010) leads to higher dispersion coefficients. At pore-scale, higher dispersion coefficients have been observed when medium heterogeneity becomes more complex from sandstones to carbonates (Bijeljic et al., 2011), or the variance (Bruderer and Bernabé, 2001; Bruderer-Weng et al., 2004) and correlation length (Bruderer-Weng et al., 2004; Babaei and Joekar-Niasar, 2016) of pore-network models increase.

An important characteristic of dispersion is the scale-dependency along the flow length (i.e. variation of KL along the porous medium length). Due to the presence of the solid phase, the velocity field variations in the medium are significant and cause the concentration front to grow as the solute particles travel. Hence, a larger surface area is available for the molecular diffusion of solute which increases the dispersion until the solute particles have traveled enough distance (or time) to completely sample the velocity field. Experimental measurements (Arya et al., 1988; Moroni and Cushman, 2001) as well as Darcy-scale (Connolly and Johns, 2016; Johns and Garmeh, 2010; Adepoju et al., 2013; John et al., 2010; Mahadevan et al., 2003) and pore-scale (Bijeljic et al., 2011; Maier et al., 2000; Maier et al., 2003; Bijeljic et al., 2004; Bruderer and Bernabé, 2001; Bruderer-Weng et al., 2004; Garmeh et al., 2009; Zhu and Fox, 2002) numerical simulations at the unit viscosity ratio (i.e. stable flow) have shown that KL increases with the displacement time or the distance traveled by solute particles until asymptotic dispersion is established. At the pore-level, this asymptotic length scale is shown to be about five to six pore diameters for random bead packs (Moroni and Cushman, 2001), about seven grain diameters for unconfined sphere packings (Maier et al., 2003), and hundreds of pores for consolidated media (Bijeljic et al., 2004). At the Darcy scale, however, due to the presence of large scale heterogeneities such as permeability layering, the asymptotic length for dispersion is much higher (in order of a few to hundreds of meters) (John et al., 2010; Mahadevan et al., 2003). For layered permeability fields (Lake and Hirasaki, 1981), it was observed that if the ratio of the longitudinal travel time of solute particles owing to advection to their transverse travel time due to dispersion is smaller than 0.2, longitudinal dispersion coefficient never reaches its asymptotic value. In the presence of viscous fingering, numerical simulations of dispersion during Darcy flow (Jha et al., 2013; Jha et al., 2011a; Jha et al., 2011b) have revealed that there is an interplay between channeling and viscous fingering as the transport of solute proceeds. At early times, a higher rate of mixing was observed due to the additional surface area created by fingering. At later times during the flow at high adverse viscosity ratios, however, channeling dominates the flow and slows down the creation of the additional interface area thus making the mixing less efficient (Jha et al., 2013; Jha et al., 2011a; Jha et al., 2011b).

Despite the extensive research on mixing and dispersion in porous media, there are a few studies on the combined effect of medium heterogeneity and viscous fingering on the values of KL and its scale-dependency. Most of the previous studies focus on the scale-dependency of dispersion during stable flow (unit viscosity ratio) and the others that account for viscous fingering (Nicolaides et al., 2015; Connolly and Johns, 2016; Johns and Garmeh, 2010; Jha et al., 2013; Jha et al., 2011a; Jha et al., 2011b) are focused on the modeling of dispersion at Darcy-scale which neglects the variability of heterogeneity in scales smaller than the size of the continuum gridblocks. In this study, we model dispersion in pore-scale by solving the point equations of flow and transport in 2-dimensional pore-scale models of granular porous media with different levels of heterogeneity and layering. Numerical simulations at different Peclet numbers are carried out to investigate the effect of heterogeneity and layering on the scale-dependency of KL during both unit and adverse viscosity ratio flows. In what follows, we first present the governing equations, the physical models of the porous media, the numerical approaches, and the calculation procedure of KL in section two. Results of the dispersion simulation at both stable and unstable flows are discussed in section three. Finally, we summarize the main conclusions of the present study in section four.

Section snippets

Governing equations

We consider the flow of two miscible fluids with the same density (ρ) and different viscosities μ1 and μ2 (μ1μ2), corresponding to the displaced and displacing fluids respectively. It is assumed that the fluids are first-contact miscible and incompressible. Also, we assume that the molecular diffusion coefficient (D) between the solutions is constant and isotropic. We solve the following continuity, Navier-Stokes, and advection-diffusion equations simultaneously to model the dynamics of

Validation of the numerical approach

In order to validate the numerical approach, we simulate hydrodynamic dispersion during flow between two parallel plates (resembling a fracture) and then calculate the asymptotic longitudinal dispersion coefficient. Analytically, it has been shown that the longitudinal dispersion coefficient for a fracture scales with Peclet number as KL/D = 1 + (2/105) Pe2 (Berkowitz and Zhou, 1996; Wang et al., 2012), where Pe = umb/D, um is the mean velocity and b is the half-fracture aperture. Fig. 5 plots

Concluding remarks

Numerical pore-scale simulations are carried out to model the dispersion in porous media during both stable and unstable miscible displacements. We solve Navier-Stokes and convection-diffusion equations to find the velocity field and concentration profile across the heterogenous packings of circular grains. The pore-level heterogeneity of porous domains is characterized by their particle size distribution while layering is introduced in both longitudinal and transverse directions. Numerically

Declarations of interest

None.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the FUR program from NSERC, AITF/i-CORE, and the sponsoring companies: Athabasca Oil Corporation, Laricina Energy Ltd., Devon Canada, Foundation CMG, Husky Energy, Brion Energy, Canadian Natural, Maersk Oil, Suncor Energy, and Schulich School of Engineering (University of Calgary). We also thank Saeed Taheri for providing the grain arrangement code. SHH also acknowledge the Imperial Oil University Research Award and NSERC Discovery Grant.

References (58)

  • R. Aris

    On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube

  • A. Arya et al.

    Dispersion and reservoir heterogeneity

    SPE-14231-PA

    (1988)
  • B. Berkowitz et al.

    Reactive solute transport in a single fracture

    Water Resour. Res

    (1996)
  • B. Bijeljic et al.

    Signature of non-fickian solute transport in complex heterogeneous porous media

    Phys. Rev. Lett

    (2011)
  • B. Bijeljic et al.

    Pore-scale modeling of longitudinal dispersion

    Water Resour. Res

    (2004)
  • H. Brenner

    Dispersion resulting from flow through spatially periodic porous media

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Phys. Eng. Sci.

    (1980)
  • R.E. Bretz et al.

    Effect of pore structure on miscible displacement in laboratory cores

    SPE-14231-PA

    (1988)
  • W.E. Brigham et al.

    Experiments on mixing during miscible displacement in porous media

    SPE-110228-PA

    (1961)
  • C. Bruderer et al.

    Network modeling of dispersion: Transition from Taylor Dispersion in homogeneous networks to mechanical dispersion in very heterogeneous ones

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2001)
  • D. Coelho et al.

    Geometrical and transport properties of random packings of spheres and aspherical particles

    Phys. Rev. E

    (1997)
  • Version 5.2

    (2015)
  • M. Connolly et al.

    Scale-dependent mixing for adverse mobility ratio flows in heterogeneous porous media

    Transp. Porous Media

    (2016)
  • A.C. Correa et al.

    Computation and interpretation of miscible displacement performance in heterogeneous porous media

    SPE Reservoir Eng.

    (1990)
  • Jik. de Arcangelis L et al.

    Hydrodynamic dispersion in network models of porous media

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1986)
  • H. Dubner et al.

    Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms by relating them to the finite Fourier cosine transform

    J. ACM (JACM)

    (1968)
  • G. Garmeh et al.

    Pore-scale simulation of dispersion in porous media

    SPE-110228-PA

    (2009)
  • G.A. Gist et al.

    Hydrodynamic dispersion and pore geometry in consolidated rock

    Phys. Fluids A

    (1990)
  • B. Jha et al.

    Quantifying mixing in viscously unstable porous media flows

    Phys. Rev. E

    (2011)
  • B. Jha et al.

    Fluid mixing from viscous fingering

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Non-Darcy flows in layered porous media (LPMs) with contrasting pore space structures

      2022, Petroleum Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The LPM tends to be heterogeneous on a macroscopic scale, e.g., structured soils (Martinez et al., 2021), fracture-matrix systems (Edery et al., 2016; Rostami et al., 2020), and aquifer-aquitard systems (Zhan et al., 2009). Characterizing accurately fluid flow behaviors within the LPM is of great importance for natural and industrial processes, such as groundwater flow in heterogeneous formations, solute transport in aquifer-aquitard systems (Berkowitz et al., 2009), and the process of miscible displacements (Afshari et al., 2018). Fluid flow across the interface of layers is a complex process.

    • Exact analytical solution of a generalized multiple moving boundary model of one-dimensional non-Darcy flow in heterogeneous multilayered low-permeability porous media with a threshold pressure gradient

      2020, Applied Mathematical Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the water flooding process for secondary oil recovery enhancement [8–12], it is also very difficult to inject water into low-permeability layers with considerable residual oil, which will largely reduce the water flooding effect in stratified oil reservoirs. The heterogeneous stratification properties of porous media are normally also present in other seepage flow problems in engineering, such as contaminant solute transport in layered soils in environment engineering [13], rainfall infiltration into stratified porous media in municipal engineering [14], and water flow in stratified aquifers in water resource systems [15–17]. Therefore, it is very necessary to conduct research on the underlying mathematical modeling problems of fluid flow in heterogeneous multilayered porous media for the development of relevant engineering technology.

    • Pore-scale modeling of coupled thermal and solutal dispersion in double diffusive-advective flows through porous media

      2020, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the past decades, numerous studies have been carried out to investigate heat and solute dispersion in porous media [28]. In the case of solute dispersion, several models for solutal dispersion coefficient have been proposed to describe the variation of the longitudinal and transverse components in a wide range of controlling parameters such as displacement velocity, geometry of the pore space, and viscosity contrast of the solutions [2,27,29–45]. These models typically identify three primary dispersion regimes in viscously stable displacements, defined as: (i) diffusion-dominated regime, where dispersion coefficient is almost constant and equal to the effective molecular diffusion; (ii) mixed diffusion-advection or power-law regime, where dispersion coefficient scales with the Peclet number by a power-law functionality; and (iii) advection-dominated or mechanical regime, where dispersion coefficient linearly increases with the Peclet number.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text