Elsevier

Advances in Water Resources

Volume 62, Part B, December 2013, Pages 303-316
Advances in Water Resources

A mathematical and computational study of the dispersivity tensor in anisotropic porous media

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.07.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dispersion in anisotropic porous media.

  • A constructive derivation of the fourth-order dispersivity tensor.

  • Effects of fluid velocity and molecular diffusion on dispersivity.

Abstract

Dispersive transport in porous media is usually described through a Fickian model, in which the flux is the product of a dispersion tensor times the concentration gradient. This model is based on certain implicit assumptions, including slowly varying conditions. About fifty years ago, it was first suggested that the parameterization of the second-order dispersion tensor for anisotropic porous media involves a fourth-order dispersivity tensor. However, the properties of the dispersivity tensor have not been adequately studied. This work contributes to achieving a better grasp of dispersion in anisotropic porous media through a number of ways. First, with clearly stated assumptions and from first principles, we use the method of moments to derive a mathematical formula for the fourth-order dispersivity tensor, and show that it is a function of pore geometry, fluid velocity, and pore diffusion. Second, by using pore-scale flow and transport simulations through orderly and randomly packed 2-D and 3-D porous media, we evaluate the effects of the three factors on dispersivity. Different relationships with the Peclét number are observed for the longitudinal and transverse dispersivities and for orderly and randomly packed media. Third, we discuss the limitations of 2-D periodic media with simple structures in computing transverse dispersivity, which is more accurately predicted in the 3-D periodic media and 2-D randomly packed media. Fourth, we exhibit through numerical simulations that the method of moments can, computational limitations notwithstanding, be extended to stationary porous media.

Introduction

Dispersion in porous media is among the most significant topics in the study of solute transport. The classical Advection–Dispersion model assumes that dispersion follows Fick’s Law at the macroscopic level, such that dispersive flux is proportional to the concentration gradient [1]. The properties of dispersion coefficients, especially the longitudinal dispersion coefficient, have been studied extensively and at many scales. Representative literature includes: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. At the Darcy or laboratory scale, the most widely applied parameterization of dispersion in porous media was proposed by Scheidegger [19]. In its simplest form, Scheidegger’s parameterization [19] states that the dispersion coefficient is the sum of a mechanical-dispersion term and a pore-diffusion term, and that the mechanical dispersion coefficient is a linear function of mean fluid velocity through the definition of dispersivity.

Even though most early work on dispersion focused on longitudinal dispersion, recent studies (e.g., [20], [21]) have revealed that transverse dispersion and the mixing it describes can be more important to chemical reactions and biodegradation of groundwater contaminants than longitudinal dispersion. In practical applications, the transverse dispersion coefficient is also assumed to be a linear function of mean fluid velocity following Scheidegger’s parameterization [1], [22]. A widely used estimation of transverse dispersivity is 3/16ˆ (where ˆ is the pore length [L]) [23]. However, transverse dispersion may not necessarily follow the same properties as the longitudinal dispersion. For example, according to [7], field-scale transverse dispersivity diminishes in proportion to Pe-1 instead of solely depending on pore geometry as generally applied.

Previous studies also hypothesized that the dispersivity of an anisotropic porous medium should be a higher-order tensor (see Section 2 for more details). The higher-order tensorial form of dispersivity has been subjected to very few studies. We are not aware of any study that provides a solid proof (starting with well-defined assumptions) to the tensorial form of dispersivity. Although the complexity of a higher-order tensor may impede its application in practical groundwater modeling, a comprehensive study will allow us to improve our understanding of the basic properties of dispersion and to develop better parameterizations, particularly since new upscaling theories and computational tools may allow us to revisit this important topic.

The objective of this paper is to revisit dispersion in anisotropic porous media and to explore the tensorial properties of dispersivity from a scientific standpoint. This study utilizes the method of moments [24], a rigorous approach based on a few well-defined assumptions. In this approach, large-scale heterogeneity is neglected through the discretization of the spectrum of medium properties, which is mathematically equivalent to using a periodic approximation of heterogeneity. We focus on dispersion at large time, when the system is at local equilibrium and changes in the system are gradual. Local equilibrium indicates a status that all the velocity fields, both the high and low velocities, are equally sampled by solute mass in a statistical sense (refer to [9] for more information of local equilibrium). Our mathematical analysis demonstrates that in an anisotropic medium with a mean flow that has an angle with the coordinates, the mechanical dispersion tensor D^mn can be expressed through a fourth-order dispersivity tensor. A constructive derivation in Section 4 yields a mathematical formula of the dispersivity tensor in periodic porous media starting from first principles under well-defined assumptions. The formula indicates the dependency of the dispersivity on flow conditions as well as pore geometry. Furthermore, we design a numerical experiment to explicitly calculate the fourth-order dispersivity tensor based on pore-scale simulations of the flow and transport, and to evaluate the effects of fluid velocity and molecular diffusion. The results provide a comprehensive understanding of the physical basis and properties of the dispersivity tensor; to the best of our knowledge, this is the first of its kind. Finally, through the comparison of numerical results between 2-D and 3-D models, and between orderly and randomly packed porous media, we demonstrate the effect of pore geometry on dispersivity, providing insights for future pore-scale simulations of dispersion in porous media.

Section snippets

Background of dispersivity tensor

Bear [25] studied the variance of mass in a 2-D isotropic porous medium, and arrived at the relationship between the variance and displacement of the mass,σmn2=2αIISδmn+2(αI-αII)Sij,i,j,m,n,=1,2,where σmn2 is the variance of concentration distribution [L2], and Sij is the mass displacement [L], δmn is the Kronecker symbol [–], and αI and αII are the longitudinal and transverse dispersivities of the isotropic medium [L]. When the mean flow has an angle β with the Cartesian coordinate system, the

Method of moments

The mathematical analysis and numerical simulations in this paper are based on the method of moments [24]. A curcial advantage of this method is that it is a rigorous and exact approach to calculate large-time dispersion in porous media that are extended in infinite domains and are spatially periodic. The dispersion coefficient is calculated explicitly based on a volume averaging approach. In the case of homogeneous and isotropic molecular diffusion, the mechanical dispersion tensor D^mn [L2/T]

A mathematical formula of the fourth-order dispersivity tensor

Although the tensorial form of dispersivity was hypothesized over 50 years ago [25], a solid proof and general agreement of why a higher-order tensor is necessary and how it explicitly relates to medium geometry, velocity magnitude, and molecular diffusion have yet to be achieved. In this section, a constructive derivation based on Brenner’s method of moments (Eq. (11)) and Fourier expansions shows that the dispersivity has a fourth-order tensorial form.

First, it is recognized that velocity

Pore-scale simulation approach

In order to gain a deeper understanding of the properties of dispersivity tensor, we design a pore-scale numerical experiment to explicitly calculate the dispersivity tensor through the method of moments (Eqs. (11), (12)). The finite element code COMSOL Multiphysics 4.2a (Comsol Inc., Palo Alto, California) is used. Fig. 2 shows the porous structures of the studied unit cells.

This study focuses on flows with low Reynolds number, which can be described by the steady-state linear Stokes equation

2-D isotropic case

In a 2-D isotropic medium, the dispersivity tensor contains only two major components, the longitudinal and transverse dispersivities. When the Cartesian coordinates align with the principle directions of the porous medium and the flow is in the x1 direction, the mechanical dispersion coefficient tenor is,D^1100D^22=α11|u¯|00α22|u¯|.It can be noted that α11 is the longitudinal dispersivity [L] and α22 is the transverse dispersivity [L]. Fig. 3 shows the change of the longitudinal and transverse

Conclusions

From a scientific focus, this study uses the method of moments [24] to investigate dispersion in anisotropic porous media with flows that may have angles with the principal directions of the media. The first contribution of this work is the solid mathematical proof to the fourth-order dispersivity tensor, which was hypothesized by Bear [25]. The mathematical analysis indicates that the dispersivity does not solely depend on the pore geometry as generally assumed in practical applications, but

Acknowledgement

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0738772. Additional funding was provided by a Stanford Graduate Fellowship. The MATLAB code provided by Dr. David L. Hochstetler to generate the randomly packed medium is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank the four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References (56)

  • L.W. Gelhar et al.

    Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers

    Water Resour Res

    (1983)
  • G. Dagan

    Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations

    J Fluid Mech

    (1984)
  • Rubinstein J, Mauri R. Dispersion and convection in periodic porous media. SIAM J Appl Math 1986;46(6):1018–1023....
  • S.P. Neuman et al.

    Stochastic theory of field-scale fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous media

    Water Resour Res

    (1987)
  • P. Kitanidis

    Analysis of macrodispersion through volume-averaging: moment equations

    Stoch Hydrol Hydraul

    (1992)
  • Y. Rubin et al.

    The concept of Block-Effective macrodispersivity and a unified approach for Grid-Scale- and Plume-Scale-Dependent transport

    J Fluid Mech

    (1999)
  • Cirpka OA, Attinger S. Effective dispersion in heterogeneous media under random transient flow conditions. Water Resour...
  • Y. Rubin et al.

    On the use of block-effective macrodispersion for numerical simulations of transport in heterogeneous formations

    Water Resour Res

    (2003)
  • B.D. Wood et al.

    Volume averaging for determining the effective dispersion tensor: Closure using periodic unit cells and comparison with ensemble averaging

    Water Resour Res

    (2003)
  • J.M.P.Q. Delgado

    A critical review of dispersion in packed beds

    Heat Mass Transfer

    (2005)
  • D. Fernandez-Garcia et al.

    Impact of upscaling on solute transport: Traveltimes, scale dependence of dispersivity, and propagation of uncertainty

    Water Resour Res

    (2007)
  • Bolster D, Dentz M, Le Borgne T. Solute dispersion in channels with periodically varying apertures. Phys Fluids...
  • F.P.J. de Barros et al.

    Modelling of block-scale macrodispersion as a random function

    J Fluid Mech

    (2011)
  • A.E. Scheidegger

    On the theory of flow of miscible phases in porous media

    I.A.H. Assembly of Toronto

    (1957)
  • R.C. Acharya et al.

    Pore-scale simulation of dispersion and reaction along a transverse mixing zone in two-dimensional porous media

    Water Resour Res

    (2007)
  • C.W. Fetter

    Contaminant hydrogeology

    (1999)
  • P.G. Saffman

    A theory of dispersion in a porous medium

    J Fluid Mech

    (1959)
  • H. Brenner

    A general theory of taylor dispersion phenomena

    Physico-Chem Hydrodyn

    (1980)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Effect of distance-dependent dispersivity on density-driven flow in porous media

      2020, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The simulation of DDF problems is based on coupling Darcy’s groundwater flow equation to the solute transport equation via a state relation expressing the density as a function of solute concentration. Transport of solute in the aquifer is ruled by advection, representing the solute displacement by the mean fluid flow, and by dispersion, which accounts for solute spreading caused by velocity variations due to the heterogeneity of the porous medium at different scales (Liu and Kitanidis, 2013; Kitanidis, 2017; Dai et al., 2020). Dispersion processes have been found to play a major role in DDF problems as they cause mixing between different fluids.

    • Teaching and communicating dispersion in hydrogeology, with emphasis on the applicability of the Fickian model

      2017, Advances in Water Resources
      Citation Excerpt :

      The issue of whether the tensor follows Scheidegger’s parameterization is a more complex one. To begin with, the usual Scheidegger’s parameterization disregards effects of anisotropy in the porous medium itself (more on this issue in Liu and Kitanidis, 2013). Anisotropy in the Scheidegger dispersion matrix is strictly related to the direction of flow, which is a principal direction.

    • Editorial: A tribute to Stephen Whitaker

      2013, Advances in Water Resources
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text