Mechanisms of controlled drug release from drug-eluting stents

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.016Get rights and content

Abstract

The clinical importance of drug-eluting stents (DESs) has been demonstrated by their unparalleled success in preventing restenosis after stenting procedures. The magnitude of success is historic despite their short history. The current DESs deliver a single drug aiming to prevent or minimize proliferation of smooth muscle cells. Since the restenosis process involves several different biological responses, the ability to deliver the right drugs at the right times is critical for further development of the second generation of DESs. As the type of drugs that can be delivered from DESs varies, it is imperative to understand the drug delivery mechanisms and the approaches available for drug coating on the stents. The drug delivery mechanisms of current DESs that have been used clinically and under clinical trials are explained.

Introduction

A stent is a small, expandable wire mesh in a tube form that is used to maintain an artery open after balloon angioplasty. Stent implantation, however, tends to cause injury to the blood vessel resulting in neointimal proliferation, known as in-stent restenosis, which continues to hamper initial procedural success in 10% to 50% of patients undergoing coronary intervention [1], [2], [3]. Recently, the concept of using coronary stents for localized delivery of antiproliferative drugs with programmed pharmacokinetics has emerged as an appealing solution to overcome the restenosis problem [4], [5], [6]. The aim of such localized drug delivery is to control, or reduce, smooth muscle cell growth and migration as well as to prevent inflammatory response, which are the predominant causes of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis [7].

Localized drug delivery from drug-eluting stents (DESs) has been shown to be quite effective and accepted as one of the most promising treatment methods for preventing restenosis after stenting procedures. DESs ensure maximum delivery of the pharmacological agent directly to the target site, since they are in immediate contract with the coronary artery wall [8]. The DES approach has several advantages. Biologically active agents can be directly delivered to the target site, resulting in therapeutically effective drug concentrations in the surrounding tissues with the minimal systemic release of the drug and thus, negligible risk of systemic toxicity [9], [10].

Despite its relatively short history, DESs have already made seminal impacts in the interventional cardiology. While a few DESs are clinically available, many more DESs are expected to be developed in the near future. Currently, only two drugs, sirolimus and paclitaxel, are used in DESs approved by the Food and Drug Administration. There are many other drugs that are potentially useful for treating restenosis. Selection of a controlled drug delivery technology suitable for each drug depends on many factors, including physicochemical properties of the drug, duration of release and the release profiles. It is important to understand the currently available drug delivery technologies and how they can be applied to optimize the existing DESs and to develop new DESs. This article reviews the current DES formulations and their drug release kinetics, so that it can serve as a useful source of information for those who are involved in the DES area.

Section snippets

Drug delivery mechanisms

To appreciate the technologies associated with the current DESs and to develop new formulations, it would be beneficial to briefly review the drug delivery technologies. The controlled release technologies have been advanced during the last four decades. As a result, hundreds of commercial products have been developed based on the controlled drug delivery technologies. Despite such a large number of clinical products, there are only several distinct mechanisms for controlled drug release. Many

Drugs used in controlling restenosis

The drugs that are released from DESs are expected to inhibit inflammation and neiointimal formation after stent implantation. Since the inflammatory and proliferative responses are results of the complex cascade of events, various cells and tissue components involved in the vascular reparative process are all potential targets of therapeutic approaches [20]. For this reason, various drugs with widely different properties can be used for the same purpose of reducing neointimal proliferation [21]

Coating strategies for prevention of restenosis

Many different approaches have been used for drug delivery from stents, and the duration of drug delivery has been varied. It has been suggested that vascular smooth muscle cells start proliferation only a day after the injury resulting from balloon angioplasty/stent deployment for about 2 weeks [25]. Thus, it is believed that antirestenotic drugs need to be delivered for at least 3 weeks after stent deployment to prevent smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation [26], [27]. It is

Coating strategies for improving biocompatibility

In addition to prevention of restenosis, another important requirement of DESs is absence of inflammation and thrombogenicity [20], [21]. Selection of noninflammatory, nonthrombogenic coating materials has been a major obstacle in the development of DESs. This problem has been compounded by the possibility that delivery of unnecessarily high drug dose may result in delayed wound healing and endothelialization, which would increase thrombogenicity. The Cypher stent and the Taxus stent, the two

Some issues in the development of drug-eluting stents

Drug delivery from stents has become a very important research area that has shown immediate, huge benefits in clinical applications. The fact that there are a few DESs in clinical applications should not mask the importance and need of continued research on drug delivery from stents. There are still a few issues to be resolved in the development of DESs.

Summary

Despite the phenomenal advances in stent design, incidence of restenosis of bare metal stents remains unacceptably high. The interventional cardiology has been rapidly evolving and DESs have emerged as a breakthrough technology. The localized delivery of a drug directly to the target site resulted in prevention of restenosis without side effects associated with systemic delivery of the same drug at much higher concentrations. A number of different controlled drug delivery technologies can be

References (56)

  • P. Serruys et al.

    Handbook of Drug-Eluting Stents, Martin Dunitz pages

    (2005)
  • F. Liistro et al.

    Drug-eluting stents

    Heart Drug

    (2003)
  • D.R. Mcclean et al.

    Stent design: implications for restenosis

    Rev. Cardiovasc. Med.

    (2002)
  • J.R. Robinson
  • Y.W. Chien
  • H.C. Ansel et al.
  • K. Park
  • W.M. Saltzman

    Drug Delivery. Engineering Principles for Drug Therapy

    (2001)
  • M.J. Rathbone et al.
  • G. Decher et al.

    Multilayer Thin Films. Sequential Assembly of Nanocomposite Materials

    (2003)
  • C.W. Hwang et al.

    Physiological transport forces govern drug distribution for stent-based delivery

    Circulation

    (2001)
  • C.-W. Hwang et al.

    Impact of transport and drug properties on the local pharmacology of drug-eluting stents

    Int. J. Cardiovasc. Interv.

    (2003)
  • E. Regar et al.

    Stent development and local drug delivery

    Br. Med. Bull.

    (2001)
  • C.D.K. Rogers

    Drug-eluting stents: role of stent design, delivery vehicle, and drug selection

    Rev. Cardiovasc. Med.

    (2002)
  • J.E. Sousa et al.

    New frontier in cardiology. Drug eluting stents: Part II

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • X. Liu et al.

    Dexamethasone-eluting stent: an anti-inflammatory approach to inhibit coronary restenosis

    Exp. Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther.

    (2004)
  • F.C. Tanner et al.

    Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in vascular disease

    Circ. Res.

    (1998)
  • M.N. Babapulle et al.

    Coated stents for the prevention of restenosis: Part II

    Circulation

    (2002)
  • Cited by (314)

    • Cellulose nanocrystals based delivery vehicles for anticancer agent curcumin

      2022, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Drug-Eluting Stents: an Innovative Multidisciplinary Drug Delivery Platform”, Vol. 58/3, 2006.

    View full text