Short CommunicationAdolescents' understanding and use of nicotine in e-cigarettes
Introduction
Rates of use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and other electronic vaping products among adolescents increased dramatically from 2011 to 2015 (Singh et al., 2016), although the trend may have leveled off in 2016 (Miech, Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2017). E-cigarette use can be detrimental to adolescents because it exposes them to harmful constituents in aerosol such as formaldehyde (Goniewicz, Hajek, & McRobbie, 2014) and nicotine, a chemical that contributes to addiction and harms adolescent brain development (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2012). Using e-cigarettes may or may not serve as a “gateway” to other tobacco use (Etter, 2017; Barrington-Trimis, Urman, Berhane, et al., 2016).
Adolescents' reports of using nicotine-containing versus nicotine-free e-cigarettes are inconsistent. A 2014 study found that, among Connecticut youth who used e-cigarettes, 29% typically used e-liquid without nicotine, 37% used e-liquid with nicotine, and 34% did not know if the e-liquid they used contained nicotine (Morean, Kong, Camenga, Cavallo, & Krishnan-Sarin, 2015). In contrast, in the 2015 Monitoring the Future (MTF) study, two-thirds of middle and high school students stated that the “mist” from the last e-cigarette they used contained “just flavoring” rather than nicotine, marijuana or hash oil, other substances, or unknown substances (“don't know”) (Miech, Patrick, O'Malley, & Johnston, 2017). Given that adolescents have difficulty differentiating types of vaping products and their characteristics (Wagoner et al., 2016), and even adults are often unsure of the amount of nicotine in the e-cigarettes they use (Hinds III, Loukas, Chow, et al., 2016; Kim, Davis, Dohack, & Clark, 2017), the accuracy of adolescents' self reports of nicotine use is unclear.
Given the potential for nicotine to cause long-lasting developmental effects on adolescents (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2012), it is important to understand whether adolescents can appropriately self-report use of non-nicotine e-cigarettes as well as determine their general understanding of nicotine and other chemicals in e-cigarettes. This study explored these issues among adolescents in a convenience sample of current e-cigarette users.
Section snippets
Procedures
We recruited adolescents through advertisements on Facebook and Instagram. Eligible participants were aged 15–17, were currently living in the United States, provided a valid email address, and reported use of an e-cigarette at least once in the past 30 days. We screened out fraud and poor response quality based on similarities in email addresses and responses to an attention check. The study was approved by RTI International's Institutional Review Board. Pepper et al. provide additional
Results
Of all qualified respondents (n = 1589), 29.1% stated that they usually used non-nicotine e-liquid, while 27.6% reported they usually used e-liquids with nicotine, 38.7% reported ‘both,’ and 4.5% reported ‘not sure’ or preferred not to answer. Most respondents were male (51.8%), aged 15 or 16 (63.8%), and non-Hispanic white (52.6%). Just over half (52.7%) had smoked cigarettes in the past 30 days, and fewer reported using little cigars/cigarillos (20.2%) or OTPs (24.3%). Most respondents used
Discussion
Two-thirds (66.3%) of respondents usually used e-cigarettes with nicotine or as often with nicotine as without. This rate of nicotine use is similar to that reported in a survey of Connecticut adolescents (Morean et al., 2015) and higher than the rate reported in the MTF study (Miech et al., 2017). This contrast might result from a difference in question wording: the survey of Connecticut adolescents asked about typical use, as this study did, while the MTF study asked about most recent use.
Role of funding sources
This work was supported by Strategic Investment Funds from RTI International. RTI International employs the authors but had no other role in study design, reporting, the interpretation of findings, or the decision to submit the manuscript.
Contributors
Dr. Farrelly designed the study. Drs. Farrelly and Pepper conceptualized the manuscript. Ms. Watson conducted the statistical analysis. Dr. Pepper and Ms. Watson wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References (17)
- et al.
E-cigarettes and future cigarette use
Pediatrics
(2016) - et al.
A qualitative approach to understanding real-world electronic cigarette use: Implications for measurement and regulation
Preventing Chronic Disease
(2016) Gateway effects and electronic cigarettes
Addiction
(2017)- et al.
Nicotine content of electronic cigarettes, its release in vapour and its consistency across batches: Regulatory implications
Addiction
(2014) - et al.
Using cognitive interviewing to better assess young adult e-cigarette use
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
(2016) - et al.
E-cigarettes use behavior and experience of adults: Qualitative research findings to inform e-cigarette use measure development
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
(2017) - et al.
What are kids vaping? Results from a national survey of US adolescents
Tobacco Control
(2017) - et al.
Vaping, hookah use by US teens declines for first time. University of Michigan News Service
Cited by (51)
Flavors increase adolescents’ willingness to try nicotine and cannabis vape products
2023, Drug and Alcohol DependencePrevalence, patterns, and determinants of electronic cigarette and heated tobacco product use in Greece: A cross-sectional survey
2023, Hellenic Journal of CardiologyPhysical and mental health outcomes associated with adolescent E-cigarette use
2022, Journal of Pediatric NursingUse frequency and symptoms of nicotine dependence among adolescent E-cigarette users: Comparison of JUUL and Non-JUUL users
2021, Drug and Alcohol DependenceNicotine-free vapor inhalation produces behavioral disruptions and anxiety-like behaviors in mice: Effects of puff duration, session length, sex, and flavor
2021, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior