Original ContributionsSealantsFeasibility and usability of measuring receipt of sealants in 2 states
Section snippets
Measure specification
We used the CMS core measure set technical specification to calculate the SEAL measure.
Data sources
We used child-level Texas and Florida Medicaid enrollment and dental claims data from calendar years 2014 through 2017.
Assessing reliability, validity, and feasibility
To assess reliability, we focused on the CRA component of the measure. We examined the difference in the numbers of children identified as “at risk” in Texas and Florida and the extent to which the results would differ if a 3-year look-back period was used in both states.
To assess validity,
Reliability
The SEAL technical specifications for CRA allow for different approaches when calculating risk. We observed variability between Texas and Florida in the proportion of children ages 6 through 9 years identified at elevated risk for years 2014 through 2017, with 72% through 85% at elevated risk in Texas and 32% through 39% in Florida, depending on the year (Table). The 2 states use different approaches to calculate caries risk. Texas uses CRA codes D0602 and D0603 and CDT codes, as defined in the
Discussion
Our study raises questions about the reliability, validity, and usability of the SEAL measure. We found variability between the 2 states in the approaches used to calculate caries risk, with 1 state using procedures from claims data combined with a 3-year look-back period and the other state using risk codes. These 2 calculation methods lead to differing results, with Florida showing a smaller percentage of children with elevated caries risk than Texas. Relying on prior procedures and a 3-year
Conclusions
Our study supports enhancing validity and feasibility of calculating the SEAL measure using claims data. We propose eliminating the CRA requirement given the limited predictive accuracy of current CRA measures and concerns about access to care when relying on treatment history. However, it is also possible to standardize the approach to reporting caries risk so that states and dental plans can work with their practitioners to ensure caries risk is appropriately assessed, documented, and
Dr. Shenkman is a professor, Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32608.
References (17)
- et al.
Electronic dental record use and clinical information management patterns among practitioner-investigators in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network
JADA
(2013) Oral Health in America: A report of the surgeon general, executive summary
(2000)- et al.
Disparities in early childhood caries
BMC Oral Health
(2006) - et al.
Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials—a report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
JADA
(2016) Core set of Children’s Health Care Quality Measures for Medicaid and CHIP (Child Core Set): technical specifications and resource manual for federal fiscal year 2018
- et al.
Validity versus feasibility for quality of care indicators: expert panel results from the MI-Plus study
Int J Qual Health Care
(2010) Selecting quality and resource use measures: a decision guide for community quality collaboratives—public reporting appendix A, measure evaluation framework
Pediatric Quality Measures Program (PQMP): dissemination and implementation of Child Health Quality Measures cooperative research grants (U18)
Cited by (2)
Demonstration of payer readiness for value-based care in a fee-for-service environment: Measuring provider performance on sealant delivery
2020, Journal of Public Health Dentistry
Dr. Shenkman is a professor, Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32608.
Dr. Tomar is a professor, Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Dr. Manning is the executive director, client services, DentaQuest, Boston, MA.
Ms. Davis is vice president, dental management and quality improvement, MCNA Dental, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
Ms. Sun is a data management analyst, Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Dr. Amundson is a physician, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Partners Central Minnesota Clinic, Sartell, MN.
Dr. Mistry is the director, Division of Priority Populations Research, and the senior advisor, Child Health and Quality Improvement, Office of Extramural Research, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
Disclosure. Dr. Manning reports that DentaQuest has a financial interest as a managed care organization that administers Medicaid programs in various states including Texas and Florida. None of the other authors reported any disclosures.
This study was supported by grant 1U18HS025298-03 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Research reported in this publication was also partially supported by the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is supported in part by award UL1TR001427 by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.