Original Contributions
Carious Lesions
Surface characteristics and lesion depth and activity of suspicious occlusal carious lesions: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.08.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

A lesion on an occlusal tooth surface with no cavitation and no radiographic radiolucency but in which caries is suspected owing to surface roughness, opacities, or staining can be defined as a suspicious occlusal carious lesion (SOCL). The authors' objective was to quantify the characteristics of SOCLs and their relationship to lesion depth and activity after these lesions were opened surgically.

Methods

Ninety-three dentists participated in the study. When a consenting patient had an SOCL, information was recorded about the tooth, lesion, treatment provided, and, if the SOCL was opened surgically, its lesion depth. The Rao-Scott cluster-adjusted χ2 test was used to evaluate associations between lesion depth and color, roughness, patient risk, and luster.

Results

The authors analyzed 1,593 SOCLs. Lesion color varied from yellow/light brown (40%) to dark brown/black (47%), with 13% other colors. Most (69%) of SOCLs had a rough surface when examined with an explorer. Over one-third of the SOCLs (39%) were treated surgically. Of the 585 surgically treated SOCLs, 61% had dentinal caries. There were statistically significant associations between lesion depth and color (P = .03), luster (P = .04), and roughness (P = .01). The authors classified 52% of the patients as being at elevated caries risk. The authors found no significant associations between lesion depth and patient risk (P = .07).

Conclusions

Although statistically significant, the clinical characteristics studied do not provide accurate guidance for making definitive treatment decisions and result in high rates of false positives.

Practical Implications

Given that 39% of the opened lesions did not have dentinal caries or were inactive, evidence-based preventive management is an appropriate alternative to surgical intervention.

Section snippets

Methods

The results we present here were generated as a part of a larger study conducted in dental practices in the network. The network is a consortium of dental practices established to answer questions raised by dental practitioners in everyday clinical practice and to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to prevent, manage, and treat oral diseases and conditions.17, 18

Practitioners and patients

The participants included 93 dentists from all 6 network regions. As shown in Table 1, of these 93 practitioners, 34 were women, 69 were non-Hispanic white, and 69 graduated from dental school more than 15 years before the study. There was a fairly equal distribution of practitioners per region, ranging from 13 in the Western region to 18 in the South Central region.

As shown in Table 1, 72% of the patients were 19 years or older, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 32 (17) years. More than

Discussion

Dental care has slowly evolved from a time when all carious lesions, regardless of size, were restored to today’s “early detection and management.”8 Diagnosing caries can be thought of as a process that involves 3 steps: detection, assessment of the severity, and assessment of the activity,20 which will lead to an appropriate treatment plan. Assessment of severity and activity can be established on the basis of cues such as color, feel, and luster of the lesion21 as well as the caries risk of

Conclusions

Despite the statistically significant associations between the clinical characteristics that we examined and the presence of caries extending into dentin and despite the apparent use of these characteristics by the participating practitioners, these characteristics do not seem to be strong independent predictors of dentinal caries in clinical practice. In response to the question “When you treated the lesion, what did you find?”, practitioners reported active caries extending into the dentin in

Dr. Makhija is an associate professor, Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1919 7th Ave South, SDB 111, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007.

References (34)

  • C.E. Ketley et al.

    Visual and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries in first permanent molars and in second primary molars

    Br Dent J

    (1993)
  • C.M. Pine et al.

    Dynamics of and diagnostic methods for detecting small carious lesions

    Caries Res

    (1996)
  • N.B. Pitts

    Diagnostic tools and measurements: impact on appropriate care

    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol

    (1997)
  • A. Ouellet et al.

    Detection of occlusal carious lesions

    Gen Dent

    (2002)
  • A. Lussi

    Comparison of different methods for the diagnosis of fissure caries without cavitation

    Caries Res

    (1993)
  • Fejerskov O, Kidd E, eds. 2008. Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.:...
  • A.I. Ismail et al.

    Dental caries in the second millennium

    J Dent Educ

    (2001)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Non-invasive caries detection and delineation via novel laser-induced fluorescence with hyperspectral imaging

      2022, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Early diagnosis of tooth decay could eliminate disease progression [4,5]. Caries visual inspection is the classical examination mode; alternatively such technique cannot secure early caries diagnosis [2,6,7]. On the other hand, dental radiography is accompanied with ionizing radiation; it cannot be adopted frequently in short time period [8].

    • Laser induced fluorescence with 2-D Hilbert transform edge detection algorithm and 3D fluorescence images for white spot early recognition

      2020, Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many optical techniques can be employed for caries detection, such as Raman spectroscopy, elastic scattering, diffuse reflectance (DR) spectroscopy, absorption spectroscopy, and photoacoustic imaging [11–13]. However, all these techniques suffer from lack of simplicity, and reliability [11,14–19]. Furthermore, these techniques require direct contact with tested sample tissue.

    • Design and implementation of novel hyperspectral imaging for dental carious early detection using laser induced fluorescence

      2018, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore an optical imaging system, for early diagnosis of carious, is highly beneficial [6–8]. This approach can offer early detection, cutback cost, as well as minimize treatment time [9–12]. The light-tissue interactions, for diagnostic application, must not affect the tissue structure.

    • The Burden and Management of Dental Caries in Older Children

      2018, Pediatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      A recent study showed that clinicians making decisions regarding suspicious occlusal caries lesions were more likely to monitor (40%) and recommend oral hygiene instructions (21%) than to place sealants (3%). Surgical intervention was implemented in 39% of suspicious occlusal carious lesions, and of those so treated 61% had dental caries.42 Because almost a third of these patients did in fact not have dental caries, evidence-based preventative management, including the use of sealants, should have been considered an appropriate alternative.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr. Makhija is an associate professor, Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1919 7th Ave South, SDB 111, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007.

    Dr. Shugars is a professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Dr. Gilbert is a professor, Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

    Dr. Litaker is an associate professor, Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

    Dr. Bader is a professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Dr. Schaffer is a private practitioner, Phoenix, AZ.

    Dr. Gordan is a professor, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida Health Science Center, Gainesville, FL.

    Dr. Rindal is a senior investigator, HealthPartners Institute, and associate dental director for research, HealthPartners Dental Group, Minneapolis, MN.

    Dr. Pihlstrom is an associate director for Evidence Based Care and Oral Research, Permanente Dental Associates, Portland, OR.

    Dr. Mungia is an assistant professor, Department of Periodontology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.

    Dr. Meyerowitz is a professor, University of Rochester, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, Rochester, NY.

    The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02340767).

    Disclosure. None of the authors reported any disclosures.

    This study was supported by grant U19-DE-22516 from the National Institutes of Health.

    The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group comprises practitioner-investigators, faculty investigators, and staff members who contributed to this activity. Lists of these people are at http://nationaldentalpbrn.org/tyfoon/site/fckeditor/SOCL%20Collaborative%20Group_staff_revised_final.pdf and http://nationaldentalpbrn.org/tyfoon/site/fckeditor/Practitioner%20list%20for%20Decision%20Aids%20for%20the%20Management%20of%20Suspicious%20Occlusal%20Caries%20Lesions_020217_2.pdf. A website devoted to details about The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network is located at http://NationalDentalPBRN.org.

    The authors extend their gratitude to The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network's practitioners who participated in the study as well as to the network’s regional coordinators (Midwest region: Tracy Shea, RDH, BSDH; Western region: Stephanie Hodge, MA; Northeast region: Christine O’Brien, RDH; South Atlantic region: Hanna Knopf, BA, Deborah McEdward, RDH, BS, CCRP; South Central region: Claudia Carcelén, MPH, Shermetria Massengale, MPH, CHES, Ellen Sowell, BA; Southwest region: Stephanie Reyes, BA, Meredith Buchberg, MPH).

    Opinions and assertions contained in the study are those of the authors and are not to be construed as necessarily representing the views of the respective organizations or the National Institutes of Health.

    The informed consent of all human participants who participated in this investigation was obtained after the nature of the procedures had been explained fully (protocol X140925003).

    View full text