Elsevier

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volume 556, Issue 1, 18 January 2006, Pages 171-177
Analytica Chimica Acta

Microbial detection in microfluidic devices through dual staining of quantum dots-labeled immunoassay and RNA hybridization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper reported the development of a microfludic device for the rapid detection of viable and nonviable microbial cells through dual labeling by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantum dots (QDs)-labeled immunofluorescent assay (IFA). The coin sized device consists of a microchannel and filtering pillars (gap = 1–2 μm) and was demonstrated to effectively trap and concentrate microbial cells (i.e. Giardia lamblia). After sample injection, FISH probe solution and QDs-labeled antibody solution were sequentially pumped into the device to accelerate the fluorescent labeling reactions at optimized flow rates (i.e. 1 and 20 μL/min, respectively). After 2 min washing for each assay, the whole process could be finished within 30 min, with minimum consumption of labeling reagents and superior fluorescent signal intensity. The choice of QDs 525 for IFA resulted in bright and stable fluorescent signal, with minimum interference with the Cy3 signal from FISH detection.

Introduction

Combined immunofluorescent assay (IFA) and florescent in situ hybridization (FISH) have been successfully demonstrated for the detection of microbial cells [1]. IFA staining provides strong signal intensity, while FISH staining is highly specific and could be used to differentiate viable and nonviable cells [2]. However, normal practices performed on glass slide or in test tube often require multiple reactions and washing steps, which are considered to be time consuming, reagent consuming and labor intensive [3], [4].

Alternatively, rapid IFA could be achieved by performing this assay on microfluidic or lab-on-a-chip devices [6], [7]. One simple approach is to create sample inlet and outlet, microfluidic channels and weir-type trapping region on a silicon-based device [7]. After injecting sample solution containing the target cells in the microchannel, these cells can be mechanically trapped at the weir region, and be labeled by flushing the microchannel with a solution containing fluorescent-conjugated antibody specific to the target cells. After brief washing, these fluorescently labeled target cells can be easily detected under a fluorescent microscopy at single cell level. Since all the reactions were performed in micro-scales, sample and reagent consumption could be reduced significantly. By employing a flow through format, assaying time could also be reduced from hours to minutes. Further integration, automation and parallel processing of multiple samples are also possible based on these microfluidic platforms [8], [9].

Based on the concept described above, this study has further demonstrated that IFA and FISH could be performed in sequence on a microfluidic filter-based device to achieve rapid detection of viable and nonviable microbial cells. The device consisted of a microchannel and filtering pillars to trap and concentrate the model microbial cells (i.e. Giardia lamblia). To further increase the signal intensity and reproducibility of IFA, semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have been recently introduced as a novel inorganic fluorescence dye. QDs are small nano-particles (ca., 2–50 nm in size) with narrow, symmetrical and tunable emission spectra and can be excited by a wide spectrum of wavelength [10]. With the excellent emission property, signal intensity and photostability, QD label can be easily differentiated from autofluorescence particles present in environments, thereby appearing to be a preferred fluorescence dye in the IFA detection of protozoa cells [11]. It is expected that these microfluidic devices can be potentially used in the rapid diagnostic of clinical samples, and in the monitoring of water quality and public health in environments.

Section snippets

Design, fabrication and simulation of microfluidic device

Fig. 1 illustrates the design and features of the microfluidic device used. The device (20 mm × 10 mm) consists of a 650 μm thick silicon base and a 500 μm thick Pyrex glass cover (corning 7740, Dow corning corporation, Midland, MI). The base plate contains a reaction chamber (50 μm in depth), an inlet (1 mm in width), an outlet (1 mm in width), a coarse filter region and a trapping filter region for microbial cells. The coarse screen which is designed for pre-filtrating large impurities from the sample

Microfluidic device

Fig. 3a and c show the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images for the cell-trapping filter region and the coarse filter region. The two pillar-type trapping regions were fabricated toward to the end of the microchannels (Fig. 3a). The distance between any two given pillars (Fig. 3b) was approximately 1.5 μm and the depth of the pillars was 50 μm. The coarse filter region (Fig. 3c) was made of arrays of diamond-shape pillars (30 μm × 30 μm) with a space of 20, 30 or 50 μm between any two given

Discussion

This study has clearly demonstrated that the use of microfluidic device as a platform could achieve rapid biochemical reactions or microbial cells detection. For IFA, rapid detection was likely achieved by improving the mass transfer rate for the labeling reagent (antibodies) in the solution to bind onto the target sites (i.e. antigens) on the surface of microbial cells. Thus, the time required to achieve a high S/N ratio could be shortened by increasing either the concentrations of the

References (13)

  • M.S. Timothy et al.

    J. Microbiol. Meth.

    (2003)
  • G. Vesey et al.

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (1998)
  • K.G. Thaddeus et al.

    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.

    (2003)
  • R.I. Amann et al.

    Appl. Environ. Microb.

    (1990)
  • G. Wallner et al.

    Cytometry

    (1993)
  • C.A. Rowe et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Cell adhesion in microchannel multiple constrictions – Evidence of mass transport limitations

    2021, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, these complex geometries and the associated flow variations increase the probability and the available area for bacterial attachment. When this happens, the performance of the device can be at stake, particularly in geometries with narrow regions such as in cell trapping [18,19] and cell processing systems that are used in a continuous mode like cytometry systems [16]. Localized fouling in devices with constrictions is a topic of recent research [6,23].

  • Quantum dots: Synthesis and characterizations

    2021, Electroanalytical Applications of Quantum Dot-Based Biosensors
  • Future prospects and concluding remarks for electroanalytical applications of quantum dots

    2021, Electroanalytical Applications of Quantum Dot-Based Biosensors
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): History, limitations and what to expect from micro-scale FISH?

    2018, Micro and Nano Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Similarly, combining capillary electrophoresis with FISH resulted in the identification of Salmonella typhimurium [84]. Combining on-chip FISH with immunofluorescence detection further increased the sensitivity of bacterial identification, while still providing short assay times of around 30 min [87]. Microscale FISH approaches provide several advantages over standard methods for bacterial identification, mainly by decreasing assay times and by using separation techniques for improving the single cell sensitivity and enabling the analysis of low numbers of cells.

  • Hot embossed polyethylene through-hole chips for bead-based microfluidicdevices

    2013, Biosensors and Bioelectronics
    Citation Excerpt :

    To date these paper-based devices have focused on semi-quantitative results interpreted by human eyesight and in some cases evaluated by remote imaging systems. These devices have yet to be found suitable for the rigorous needs of traditional clinical diagnostics (Prasad et al., 1988; Zhang et al., 2006). With these considerations in mind, there has recently been a strong focus of the medical microdevice research sectors to explore thermoset polymers as potential materials for LOC devices for the use at the point-of-care (Liu et al., 1987b; Wang et al., 1989).

  • Microfluidics for medical diagnostics and biosensors

    2011, Chemical Engineering Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    They are bright, and their emission wavelength can be easily tuned by varying size and composition, therefore allowing multiplexing with labels across a wide range of accessible wavelengths. QDs have been used in microfluidic assays for microbe and virus detection (Liu et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2006a), sensing of single molecules (Agrawal et al., 2006; Stavis et al., 2005), or in combination with FRET for applications such as signal amplification during DNA sensing and detection of molecular orientation, size, and binding (Ho et al., 2006; Medintz et al., 2003; Puleo et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2005). Chemiluminescence is the emission of energy in the form of light (with limited emission of heat) as the result of a chemical reaction.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text