ReviewA review of remote sensing technology in support of the Kyoto Protocol
Introduction
The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) contains quantified and legally binding commitments to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels. The protocol allows sinks associated with vegetation growth and expansion to be included to offset carbon emissions, which in turn raises debate about the adequacy of existing methods for establishing reliable estimates of 1990 carbon stocks/sinks levels and for measuring and monitoring current and future carbon stock/sinks. The role of remote sensing is therefore under scrutiny given its potential capacity for systematic observations at scales ranging from local to global and for the provision of data archives extending back over several decades. These issues also underscore a need for the exchange of information between remote sensing scientists and organisations (e.g. national and international policy makers, government agencies and both legal and scientific bodies) involved in the development and implementation of the protocol.
In October, 1999, two working groups of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) joined with the University of Michigan (MI, USA) to convene discussions on how remote sensing technology could contribute to the information needs required for the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol and compliance with its terms. The workshop, which was attended by representatives from national government agencies, international organisations and academic institutions, set out to review the Kyoto Protocol and to identify areas where remote sensing technology could provide support; to review current and near future remote sensing technologies that could support the information requirements identified; and to highlight shortcomings and areas where additional research would be necessary. In addition, legal aspects of trans-national remote sensing in the context of the Kyoto Protocol were investigated.
Section snippets
Remote sensing relevance to the Kyoto Protocol
Article 3.1 of the Kyoto Protocol states that “The Parties included in Annex-I shall, individually or jointly, ensure that their aggregate anthropogenic carbon dioxide equivalent emissions of the greenhouse gases listed (in Annex A) do not exceed their assigned amounts …” “… with a view to reducing their overall emissions of such gases by at least 5% below 1990 levels in the five-year commitment period 2008 to 2012”. Emissions of six greenhouse gases (measured in terms of carbon dioxide (CO2)
Implications of the Bonn Agreements and Marrakesh Accords
Although remote sensing data can be used to support the Kyoto Protocol, the utility of these data is dictated largely by protocol definitions and requirements, which are clarified in the following sections.
The contribution of remote sensing
Over the past half century, a range of airborne and space-borne sensors has acquired remote sensing data, with the number of sensors and their diversity of capability increasing over time. Today a large number of satellite sensors observe the Earth at wavelengths ranging from visible to microwave, at spatial resolutions ranging from sub-metre to kilometres and temporal frequencies ranging from 30 min to weeks or months. In addition, archives of remotely sensed data are increasing and provide a
The requirement for in situ data
For all applications discussed, up-to-date, quantifiable, in situ data are needed for development of algorithms for quantifying land cover, land cover change, biomass and sources of anthropogenic CH4 and validating derived products. A thematic product derived from remote sensing data, be it a land cover classification, carbon stock estimate or a “simple” ARD change map, has no value or credibility unless its accuracy can be reliably assessed and quantified. Although collection of field data is
Accessibility and affordability
Over the last two decades there has been a revolution in the way information about the environment is acquired, processed and stored, which has centred on the use of computer technology for data collection and manipulation, including the ability to spatially integrate, interrogate and analyse the nature of the relationships that exist with co-located data. Remote sensing, together with the use of geographic information systems (GIS) and global positioning systems (GPS), has played a key role in
Research topics
While remote sensing technology stands alone in being able to provide regional-global scale data acquisition schemes and comparable datasets, it can not yet be considered operational in more than a handful of applications relevant to the Kyoto Protocol. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that research should not be limited to fulfilling the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol but should also address the larger context of global change and measures that reduce uncertainties in estimating
Legal issues
From the viewpoint of governing international laws and treaties, a key consideration is the legal restrictions hat might affect the utilisation of remote sensing technology to support treaty verification. Relevant in this context are the UN Remote Sensing Principles (United Nations, 1986) and the Outer Space Treaty (United Nations, 1967), as well as the 1944 Chicago Convention governing international air law.
The UN Remote Sensing Principles—which do not constitute a binding treaty, but a set of
Summary and recommendations
To support the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol, remote sensing can play an important role in providing systematic observations of land cover, supporting establishment of a 1990 carbon stock baseline, detecting and quantifying rates of land cover change, quantifying above ground biomass stocks and changes in these, and mapping and monitoring certain sources of anthropogenic CH4. The greenhouse gases considered relevant in the context of remote sensing are essentially CO2 and CH4.
Systematic
Conclusions
Although political in nature, the global impact of the Kyoto Protocol on technical and scientific issues of relevance to the remote sensing community is considerable and unprecedented. Issues related to the protocol, in particular to ARD activities, will affect the work of the scientific community for years to come. Consequently, it is recommended that a considerable part of international remote sensing research activities be focused and aligned to fulfil the specific information needs posed by
Acknowledgements
The views and conclusions expressed in this review paper are to the greatest extent based on the discussions held at the Michigan workshop in October 1999, and on the workshop report that followed (Rosenqvist et al., 2000a). The authors would hereby like to acknowledge the joint nature of this work and convey our gratitude to all workshop speakers and participants: Frank Ahern (previously Canada Centre for Remote Sensing), Alan Belward (European Commission, DG JRC), Ralph Dubayah (University of
Åke Rosenqvist is a visiting scientist with the Japanese Space Agency (NASA), where he currently is leading the Kyoto and carbon initiative—an international collaborative project set out to support environmental conventions and carbon cycle science information needs with Earth Observation data. Previously, with the European Commission Joint Research Centre and before that with the Swedish Space Corporation, his research interests include development of remote sensing applications for monitoring
References (57)
- et al.
Compositing criteria for burned area assessment using multitemporal low resolution satellite data
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1998) - et al.
An algorithm for extracting burned areas from time series of AVHRR GAC data applied at a continental scale
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1999) - et al.
The laser vegetation imaging sensor (LVIS): a medium-altitude, digitization only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping
ISPRS
(1999) - et al.
The use of imaging radars for ecological applications—a review
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1997) - et al.
Tropical forest biomass density estimation using JERS-1 SAR: seasonal variation, confidence limits and application to image mosaics
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1998) - et al.
Use of large footprint scanning airborne LIDAR to estimate forest stand characteristics in the western Cascades of Oregon
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1999) - et al.
Northern forest classification using temporal multifrequency and multipolarimetric SAR images
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1994) - et al.
Forest biomass from combined ecosystem and radar backscatter
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1997) - Achard, F., Eva, H., Glinni, A., Mayaux, P., Richards, T., Stibig, H.J., 1997. Identification of deforestation hot spot...
- Ahern, F.J., Belward, A., Churchill, P., Davis, R., Janetos, A., Justice, C., Loveland, T., Malingreau, J.-P., Maiden,...
C-band repeat-pass interferometric SAR observations of the forests
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
Estimating absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and leaf area index from spectral reflectance in wheat
Agron. J.
The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land cover dataset DISCover: a project overview
Photogr. Eng. Remote Sens.
Dependence of radar backscatter on coniferous forest biomass
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens.
Estimation of forest biomass characteristics in northern Michigan with SIR-C/X-SAR data
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
A global analysis of vegetation fires: spatial and temporal dynamics
AMBIO
Radar backscatter and biomass saturation: ramifications for global biomass inventory
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
A low frequency radar experiment for measuring vegetation biomass
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
BioSAR: an inexpensive airborne VHF multi-band SAR system for vegetation biomass measurement
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
Ionospheric effects on synthetic aperture radar imaging at 100 MHz to 2 GHz
Radio Sci.
Rice crop mapping and monitoring using ERS-1 data based on experiment and modeling results
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
Cited by (199)
Current and emerging technologies for carbon accounting in urban landscapes: Advantages and limitations
2023, Ecological IndicatorsQuantifying the sensitivity of L-Band SAR to a decade of vegetation structure changes in savannas
2023, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Volumetric response also changes the polarization or orientation of the microwave's electric field and as a result, the cross-polarised signals (VH, HV) generally show higher volumetric responses than co-polarised signals (VV, HH). This volume scattering response is what lends SAR imagery so favourably to regional scale mapping of vegetation structure, particularly forest extent (Rosenqvist et al., 2003) and the detection of deforestation and degradation (Ryan et al., 2012; Woodhouse et al., 2012). Volume scattering responses are at a maximum when the size of the canopy scatterers is in the same order as the microwave wavelengths (Dobson et al., 1992; Le Toan et al., 2004; Woodhouse, 2006).
Multisource forest point cloud registration with semantic-guided keypoints and robust RANSAC mechanisms
2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSynergistic evaluation of Sentinel 1 and 2 for biomass estimation in a tropical forest of India
2022, Advances in Space Research
Åke Rosenqvist is a visiting scientist with the Japanese Space Agency (NASA), where he currently is leading the Kyoto and carbon initiative—an international collaborative project set out to support environmental conventions and carbon cycle science information needs with Earth Observation data. Previously, with the European Commission Joint Research Centre and before that with the Swedish Space Corporation, his research interests include development of remote sensing applications for monitoring and conservation of forests and wetlands. He was awarded the ISPRS President’s Honorary Citation in 2000, for promotion of Earth Observation applications to the UNFCCC.
Anthony Milne is professor of geography in the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of New South Wales and director of the University’s Centre for Remote Sensing and GIS. His current research interests lie in radar remote sensing, vegetation assessment and the mapping of wetlands. He was chairman of the IGARSS Symposium held in Sydney in 2001 and co-chairman of the NASA sponsored Pacific Rim (PACRIM) deployments of AIRSAR to the Asia-Pacific region in 1996 and 2000.
Richard Lucas is a senior lecturer within the Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences at the University of Wales at Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth. His research interests include the integration of optical/hyperspectral, radar and LIDAR data for characterising the biomass (carbon), structure and species/community composition of tropical and subtropical ecosystems and understanding the impacts of natural and anthropogenic change.
Marc Imhoff is a research scientist in the Earth Sciences Directorate at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. He specializes in the use of remote sensing and computer modeling to study human impacts to the biosphere and climate through various bio-geochemical cycles. He has worked extensively in the area of radar applications in terrain mapping and developed the first civilian VHF SAR sensor for vegetation biomass measurement. He has a PhD from Stanford University in biological sciences and is currently serving as NASA’s Earth System Science Pathfinder Project Scientist.
Craig Dobson is a research scientist at the Radiation Laboratory in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at the University of Michigan. His research interests are radar remote sensing of terrain and the characterisation of soils and vegetation in particular. He has developed and validated algorithms for estimation of near-surface soil moisture and vegetation structural parameters such as height and biomass using airborne and space-borne SAR. Since 2001, he has been serving as program manager for Earth observing SAR at NASA Headquarters.