The effect of relaxation on the epitope mapping by saturation transfer difference NMR
Introduction
In biochemical and pharmaceutical research, identification of the binding activity and characterization of the binding epitope of ligands is important to lead validation and optimization in drug discovery. Many NMR-based methods have been developed for detecting the binding interactions between small ligands and biomolecular targets. Target-based methods rely on the perturbations of 1H/15N/13C chemical shifts due to ligand binding and can be utilized to map the binding site on the protein target [1], [2], [3]. By directly detecting the ligand signals, several different methodologies have been developed to determine binding affinities of potential candidates. These ligand-based techniques include transferred NOE [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], inter-ligand NOE [9], [10], [11], diffusion [12], [13], [14], relaxation [15], [16], [17], NOE-pumping [18], [19], ligand release [20], [21], waterLOGSY [22], [23], and saturation transfer difference [24], [25], [26]. Although NMR-based techniques are not as sensitive as other commonly used methods in high-throughput drug screening, such as mass spectrometry, NMR has been considered comparatively robust in drug discovery since it is less prone to give artifacts [21]. In addition, NMR is able to supply more detailed structural information, such as the binding epitope for both target and ligand using target-based and ligand-based methods, respectively.
Saturation transfer difference (STD) is a fast and versatile method for screening binding components from a mixture [25], [26]. It is based on magnetization transfer by protein signal saturation and its relayed effect to ligand. Macromolecules have a large network of protons that are tightly coupled by dipole–dipole interactions. Saturation of a single protein resonance can result in a rapid spread of the saturation over the entire protein if spin diffusion within the protein is efficient. During the saturation period, progressive saturation transfers from the protein to the ligand protons if the ligand binds to the target. The ligand protons nearest to the protein should be saturated to the highest degree and therefore, have the strongest signal in the STD spectrum. The ligand protons, which are further from the target surface will be saturated to lower degree and their STD intensities will be weaker. Therefore, the degree of saturation of individual ligand protons reflect their proximities to the protein surface and can be used as an epitope method to describe the target–ligand interactions [7], [27], [28], [29]. Here we present a study of STD epitope mapping using a well-known system, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and trimethoprim (TMP) [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. It is found that the STD epitope values are greatly affected by longitudinal relaxation. When the longitudinal relaxation time of individual protons are significantly different, the resulting STD does not produce an accurate epitope map for the ligand–target interaction.
Section snippets
Methods
One times phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) of D2O containing 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.16 M NaCl, and 3 μM NaN3 at pH 7.3 was used to prepare all the NMR samples. Dihydrofolate reductase (EC 1.5.1.3) from bovine liver and trimethoprim were purchased from Sigma. Prior to use, DHFR was dialyzed extensively and TMP was dissolved into PBS buffer. 4.2 mM of TMP, 4.2 mM of TMP with 120 μM DHFR, and 100 μM DHFR solutions were prepared to test the ligand–target binding.
All NMR experiments were performed on
Results
In principle, the saturation degree of an individual ligand proton reflects the proximity of this proton to the target surface. When creating an epitope map, the STD intensity relative to the reference is used to create the binding epitope maps, this is usually described by the STD factor ASTD, as shown by Eq. (1):
If different systems are compared, ligand excess should be used to normalize the differences of protein concentration [27]. Fig. 1 presents the STD spectrum and
Conclusion
During the presaturation period, saturation diffuses over the entire protein and transfers progressively from the target to the ligand. However, all magnetizations, including the transferred saturation, decay because of relaxation. The relaxation mechanism during the saturation period is related not only to the observed ligand but also to the saturated protein. Several other mechanisms, such as spin diffusion within the target, magnetization transferring from the target to the ligand, and spin
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Cynthia K. Larive for useful discussions.
References (41)
Recent developments in transferred NOE methods
Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson.
(1994)Theoretical analysis of the inter-ligand overhauser effect: a new approach for mapping structural relationships of macromolecular ligands
J. Magn. Reson.
(1999)- et al.
Three-dimensional structure of M. tuberculosis dihydrofolate reductase reveals opportunities for the design of novel tuberculosis drugs
J. Mol. Biol.
(2000) - et al.
Refined crystal structures of Escherichia coli and chicken liver dihydrofolate reductase containing bound trimethoprim
J. Biol. Chem.
(1985) - et al.
Improved WATERGATE pulse sequences for solvent suppression in NMR spectroscopy
J. Mag. Res.
(1998) - et al.
The charge state of trimethoprim bound to Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase
FEBS Lett.
(1981) - et al.
Discovering high-affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR
Science
(1996) - et al.
NMR-based screening of proteins containing 13C-labeled methyl groups
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(2000) - et al.
Privileged molecules for protein binding identified from NMR-based screening
J. Med. Chem.
(2000) Transfer NOE experiments for the study of carbohydrate–protein interactions
Carbohydr. Chem. Biol.
(2000)
Transferred cross-correlated relaxation complements transferred NOE: structure of an IL-4R-derived peptide bound to STAT-6
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Mapping the active site of angiotensin-converting enzyme by transferred NOE spectroscopy
J. Med. Chem.
Application of 3D-TOCSY-trNOESY for the assignment of bioactive ligands from mixtures
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng.
The inter-ligand Overhauser effect: a powerful new NMR approach for mapping structural relationships of macromolecular ligands
J. Biol. NMR
Interligand overhauser effects in Type II dihydrofolate reductase
Biochemistry
Epitope mapping of ligand–receptor interactions by diffusion NMR
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Mixture analysis in combinatorial chemistry. Application of diffusion-resolved NMR spectroscopy
J. Org. Chem.
Diffusion-edited NMR-affinity NMR for direct observation of molecular interactions
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
One-dimensional relaxation- and diffusion-edited NMR methods for screening compounds that bind to macromolecules
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Affinity NMR: decoding DNA binding
J. Comb. Chem.
Cited by (126)
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Techniques for the Study of Glycan Interactions
2021, Comprehensive Glycoscience: Second EditionThermodynamic profile and molecular modeling of the interaction between Grb2 dimer and flavonoids Rutin and Morin
2021, Journal of Molecular StructureEndogenous modulators of neurotrophin signaling: Landscape of the transient ATP-NGF interactions
2021, Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalCitation Excerpt :The inversion recovery T1 experiments showed that the 1H T1 relaxation times of ATP range from 3.9 s in the adenine moiety to 0.43 s in the sugar moiety. Therefore STD amplification factors were determined with a short saturation delay of 0.21 s to avoid the effect of the longitudinal relaxation rate on the signal intensities [48]. Spectra were recorded with a 6578 Hz spectral width, 16,384 data points, a relaxation delay of 5 s and 4500–10600 scans.
Pyridylethanol(phenylethyl)amines are non-azole, highly selective Candida albicans sterol 14α-demethylase inhibitors
2021, Bioorganic ChemistryCitation Excerpt :The STD ligand epitope mapping experiments [35] were performed with 16.384 data points, a relaxation delay of 5 s, and 1140 scans. The short protein saturation time of 0.3 s was used, selected according to the shortest ligands 1H longitudinal relaxation time (T1) to avoid the influence of relaxation on STD amplification factors [21,43]. Selective saturation was achieved by a train of 50 ms long Gauss-shaped pulses separated by 1 ms delay.