Original articlesThe work impact of asthma and rhinitis: Findings from a population-based survey
Introduction
Asthma and rhinitis are both common and costly conditions among persons of working age. The negative impacts of these health conditions on work and employment can be defined in a number of different ways, including lower labor force participation rates, changes in employment or job responsibilities as an adjustment to the condition, lost work time due to illness, or decreased work effectiveness of productivity while still on the job. Related negative impacts include general limitation of activities or impairment of quality of life.
For asthma these negative impacts have been studied more than they have been for rhinitis. Among adults in the U.S., asthma is one of the leading non-musculoskeletal causes of work limitations affecting the employment of millions of Americans [1]. When quantified in terms of indirect health costs, decreased work productivity due to asthma, based on two separate estimates, accounted for hundreds of millions of dollars annually in the U.S. 2, 3. International data suggest a similar global burden of disease [4].
Estimates of the occupational impact of rhinitis are limited. The most widely cited U.S. cost estimate for work and productivity loss is based on the National Medical Expenditure Survey and is limited to allergic rhinitis [5]. In that study, the estimated costs of lost work productivity due to rhinitis were only 15% as much as those derived using similar methods for asthma 2, 5. These productivity assumptions, however, may have been too conservative. For example, a recent clinical drug trial in seasonal allergic rhinitis using a more direct assessment found that those with rhinitis and employed reported a 1.8% loss of work time and a 38.7% work impairment while on the job [6]. We evaluated the work impacts of asthma and rhinitis compared to one another using a population-based survey. We hypothesized that both conditions would have important occupational effects, but that the impact of asthma would be greater.
Section snippets
Overview
We studied the prevalence of work and other activity limitations among adults with asthma or rhinitis by analyzing survey responses to telephone interviews carried out in a random population-based sample. Subjects were identified through random digit dialing. Screening questions identified potentially eligible subjects based on age and reported physician diagnosis of the conditions of study interest. Structured telephone interviews assessed demographic characteristics, health status, health
Results
Table 1 shows the demographic data for the 125 subjects with asthma (with or without concomitant rhinitis) compared to the 175 subject with rhinitis alone. A significantly greater proportion of those with asthma reported household incomes below $20,000 (25% vs. 10%, P < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of those in the rhinitis group were married or living with a partner (65% vs. 49% for asthma, P = 0.01). Although there were not other statistically significant differences in the other
Discussion
Our findings indicate that both asthma and rhinitis, independently, have major quality-of-life and economic impacts through occupational disability. Occupational disability can take many forms, including decreased labor force participation rates, change of job or job responsibilities due to health reasons, lost work days, or decreased effectiveness on the job because of illness. For asthma, reduced labor force participation appears to be a more prominent disability effect. For rhinitis,
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by Research Career Development Award K04 HL03225; R01 HL56438 and K23 HL04201, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; R01 OH03480 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
References (19)
- et al.
A cost of illness study of allergic rhinitis in the United States
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(1997) - et al.
Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries
J Clin Epidemiol
(1998) - et al.
Verification of self-reported asthma and allergy in subjects and their family members volunteering for gene mapping studies
Respir Med
(1998) Overview of comorbid associations of allergic rhinitis
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(1997)- et al.
Allergic rhinitis in Rochester, Minnesota residents with asthmafrequency and impact on health care charges
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(1999) - et al.
Differences in sensitivity, maximal response and position of the concentration-response curve to methacholine between asthmatics, patients with allergic rhinitis and healthy subjects
Respir Med
(1998) Aeroallergens of Southern California
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am
(1989)- et al.
Prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens in California patients with respiratory allergy
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
(1998) Characterizing the occupational impact of asthma
Cited by (163)
Recent development on the use of sublingual immunotherapy tablets for allergic rhinitis
2021, Annals of Allergy, Asthma and ImmunologyAdd-On Omalizumab for Inadequately Controlled Severe Pollinosis Despite Standard-of-Care: A Randomized Study
2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In PracticeThe Impact of Work-Related Rhinitis on Quality of Life and Work Productivity: A General Workforce-Based Survey
2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In PracticeCitation Excerpt :Our survey showed that WRR was associated with a higher prevalence (2.6%) of rhinitis-related work disability, defined as ever leaving job or changing job tasks or reducing work time due to nasal symptoms,35 compared with non-WRR (0%). However, these figures were lower than those found among adults with rhinitis in a US population-based sample of employed adults (18%)35 and a longitudinal cohort of pulp and paper mill workers exposed to irritants (6.1%).24 More importantly, our survey revealed a significantly higher rate of impaired performance at work (ie, presenteeism) related to general health in subjects with WRR than in those with non-WRR and controls, whereas absenteeism did not differ among the 3 groups.
Asthma and career path in the French SIP Survey, 2006 and 2010
2019, Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l'EnvironnementAssessment of chronic sinonasal dysfunction and cross-cultural adaptation of the DyNaChron questionnaire
2018, Annales Francaises d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-FacialeAssessment of chronic sinonasal dysfunction and cross-cultural adaptation of the DyNaChron questionnaire
2018, European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases