Elsevier

Maturitas

Volume 33, Issue 2, 24 October 1999, Pages 95-98
Maturitas

The Middle Years Group: a holistic approach to the management of the menopause in primary care

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5122(99)00048-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: The menopause is attaining greater significance as symptoms and long-term sequelae are amenable to hormone replacement treatment. However, hormone replacement treatment is no panacea and all women undergoing the menopause need to make informed decisions about its use. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a series of group sessions for women aged 45–55 years, dealing with physical, social, emotional and medical aspects of the climacteric. Methods: All women registered at the Roborough surgery were invited to join a group for four sessions, led by the health visitor and counsellor, with a doctor leading one session on hormone replacement treatment. Women’s views on the group were obtained by questionnaire. Prescribing data on hormone replacement treatment and antidepressants were analysed for attenders and a matched group of those invited who did not attend. Results: Twelve percent of invited women attended. All stated that sessions helped an understanding of the physical and emotional changes at this time. No significant differences were found in the use of hormone replacement treatment, antidepressants or in subsequent use of the counsellor’s services between the attenders and a matched group of non-attenders. Conclusions: This group offered all women at risk the opportunity to discuss, share and learn about all aspects of the menopause. It was well received and made no major differences to the uptake of hormone replacement treatment.

Introduction

With increasing longevity, the importance of the menopause has never been more profound. Oestrogen deficiency may cause major physical and psychological symptoms [1]; long-term effects on arterial disease and osteoporosis carry a high morbidity and mortality [2], [3]. Hormone replacement therapy may reverse these effects and, as life expectancy increases, women at risk have more to gain by treatment [4]. The menopause, however, is a natural process and many women do not wish to take drug treatment for it. The risk/benefit ratio varies sharply between individuals [5] and in-depth discussion of all the issues are needed before a woman can make a decision [6].

The problem for general practitioners is how to allow all those at risk to make an informed decision on hormone replacement treatment. How to deliver it to those who want and need it, but not inflict its adverse effects on the unwilling with little to gain.

There is more to the middle years than hormones, they just add to the potential maelstrom of problems which may occur at this time of change. Women may be coping with teenage children or departing young adults, caring for elderly relatives and possibly bereavement. Marital relationships may be strained by many issues, including the realisation that fertility is over. Retirement may not be far away. There may be a sense of wonder about what life has offered so far and where it is all leading. Health problems such as cancer and heart disease become a less distant prospect.

These common problems were seen from differing angles by the health visitors, doctors and counsellor in our practice. This realisation of an unmet need culminated in the Middle Years Group being conceived. The group was organised by the health visitor and counsellor. It ran between January 1992 and July 1995.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All female patients aged 45–55 years were identified by the computer age/sex register and a written invitation was sent to attend a series of four meetings, each of 90 minutes, run in the surgery in groups of 12–16 people. The sessions were run as follows:

  • 1.

    Introduction. The health visitor and counsellor worked together in a flexible way to enable the group to establish itself. Confidentiality was stressed to enable the group to safely raise their questions and concerns.

  • 2.

    Physical health issues.

Results

Invitations were sent to 1414 patients. One hundred and sixty-three attended the groups (12%). All those attending, without exception, found the meetings helpful. Asked which session was the most useful: 32% said all, where a preference was expressed the session on HRT was most frequently chosen. Attenders stated that it provided factual information which was particularly helpful. Equally the benefits of airing and sharing problems within a group were important to others. The health visitor and

Discussion

The Middle Years Group was seen as a success by everyone involved. The patients were enthusiastic; the counsellor and health visitor felt that fundamental problems were being addressed appropriately. The doctors enjoyed the opportunity to talk to patients without the time constraints of normal appointments. It only involved a few sessions per year; each session got a lot of information over to approximately a dozen patients at a time.

The impact of attending the group was largely neutral on HRT

References (14)

  • G.T. Bungay et al.

    Study of symptoms in middle life with special reference to the menopause

    Br Med J

    (1980)
  • G.A. Colditz et al.

    Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women

    New Engl J Med

    (1987)
  • D.W. Purdie

    Broken bones-a gynaecological problem

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1988)
  • D. Grady et al.

    Hormone replacement therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women

    Ann Intern Med

    (1992)
  • E. Daly et al.

    HRT: analysis of benefits, risks and costs

    Br Med Bull

    (1992)
  • F. Griffiths

    Women’s health concerns. Is the promotion of hormone replacement therapy for prevention important to women?

    Family Pract

    (1995)
  • Gordon D, Forrest R. People and Places 2. Social and economic distinctions in England. SAUS Publications...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text