A new empirical structure factor for real liquids using internal pressure

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812(00)00468-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Customarily structure factor S(Q) of a liquid is determined experimentally (by X-ray or neutron scattering methods) and is used to derive the radial distribution function g(r) which obviously is a laborious and costly procedure. In the present paper, an equation for S(Q) for real fluids is derived which incorporates directly the internal pressure, πi, based on the fact that, the radial distribution function and hence the structure factor of a hard-sphere and a real fluid are similar. The positions of the principal maxima (PPM) correlate nicely with those adduced by experimental techniques for condensed liquids and liquid metals. In the (X-ray or neutron) scattering experiment, Q refers to the momentum change of the incident beam. In our study Q continues to have the same meaning in the ‘hypothetical’ experiment.

Introduction

The past few years or so have seen a remarkable growth in the understanding of liquid state. Many of these advantages have not yet resulted in modelling the structure factor and any of the thermodynamic property directly, and the present work is aimed at filling this gap.

Structure factor S(Q) enables us to understand both the equilibrium and transport properties of liquids. As mathematical limitations are formidable and that there is not a single theory which can account for all properties of liquids successfully, it is convenient to employ simple relations which are directly accessible from experiments, to express information about the structure of liquids. Therefore, the assumption of liquid molecules as hard-spheres (without any attractive component), helps one to mathematically formulate equations describing the liquid state with relative ease. This also forms the zero-order approximation for higher order perturbation calculations.

The validity of any theoretical model lies in its experimental confirmation, which obviously is not possible with hard-sphere fluids although the simulation procedures perform frequently this role. It is known that the thermodynamics and the relation between thermodynamics and the structure factor are different for hard-spheres and real fluids; nevertheless the radial distribution function g(r) and hence the structure factor of a hard-sphere and a real fluid are similar. In the present work, starting from Wertheim’s solution of Percus–Yevick equation for hard-spheres, we arrive at the S(Q) of real fluids. The resulting simple equation, incorporates the thermodynamic property, the internal pressure (πi) directly and is tested successfully in the case of a number of real liquids. The internal pressure allows the omission of the attractive forces and hence a direct comparison with the hard sphere fluid. This S(Q) is bound to be complementary, if not alternative, to the S(Q) determined from the costly and time-consuming scattering techniques.

Section snippets

Theoretical background

The static structure factor is described by the Fourier transform C(Q) of the Ornstein–Zernike direct correlation function asS(Q)=[1−ρC(Q)]−1where C(Q) is given by [1]C(Q)=−Q(1−η)40σrsinQrα+βrσrσ3drwhereα=(1+2η)2,β=−6η1+12η2,γ=12η(1+2η)2,η=πρσ3It is interesting to see that all quantities can be expressed by means of the packing fraction η. Block et al. [2] gave the result of the above integration asC(Q)=−24ηρx6(1−η)4[αx3(sinx−xcosx)+βx2{2xsinx−(x2−2)cosx−2}+γ{(4x3−24x)sinx−(x4−12x2+24)cos

Relationship between S(Q) and πi

The equation of state is one of the most fundamental characteristics of condensed matter and is determined by atomic as well as by statistical properties. It is not surprising that the theoretical calculation of equation of state is a very difficult task, even for simple systems such as noble gases. As a zero-order perturbation approximation, liquid molecules can be treated as hard-spheres resulting in simpler mathematical formalism. The equation of state for hard-sphere fluid isP=ρkT+23πρ2kTσ3

Application to metals

It is well known that S(Q) and the pair distribution are themselves insensitive to details of the potential. It is only when these are combined with the potential to calculate pressure or internal energy that sensitivity of the potential is manifest [17]. S(Q) as given by Eq. (15) is plotted against Q for argon and sodium (Fig. 2). Overlapping of S(Q) versus Q curves of argon and sodium supports the prediction [7] that S(Q) for either hard-sphere or real fluids with any sort of interaction

Results and discussion

The equation for S(Q), Eq. (15), contains ρ,T and πi together for the first time. As desired, the variation of S(Q) with Q is very smooth. This study involves comparison of the positions of principal maxima (PPM) in the S(Q) versus Q curve of Eq. (15) with those of the reported experimental values for liquid metals (Na, K, Rb and In), atomic liquids (Ar and Kr) (Table 3 and Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9). The general equation for S(Q) is given by [3]S(Q)−1=4πρQ0rsinQr[g(r)−1]d

References (25)

  • N.W. Ashcroft et al.

    Structure and resistivity of liquid metals

    Phys. Rev.

    (1966)
  • R. Block, J.-B. Suck, W. Freyland, F. Hensel, W. Glaser, Liquid metals, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International...
  • J.L. Yarnell et al.

    Structure factor and radial distribution function for argon at 85 K

    Phys. Rev.

    (1973)
  • E. Praestgaard et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1969)
  • G.A. Mansoori et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1969)
  • H.C. Longuet-Higgins et al.

    Mol. Phys.

    (1964)
  • C.A. Croxton, Liquid State Physics: A Statistical Mechanical Introduction, Cambridge University Press, London, 1974,...
  • A.F.M. Barton, The Dynamic Liquid State, Longman, New York,...
  • N.W. Ashcroft et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1967)
  • K. Yu et al.

    Fiz. Tverd. Tela

    (1970)
  • D. Stroud et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1972)
  • I.N. Makarenko, A.M. Nikolaenko, S.M. Stishov, Liquid metals, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on...
  • Cited by (18)

    • Calculation of self-diffusion coefficient and surface tension of liquid alkali metals using square-well fluid

      2019, Fluid Phase Equilibria
      Citation Excerpt :

      The behavior of S(k) for liquid metals is like that for HS fluids, and calculation of the physical and thermodynamic properties with the HS reference system has been found to be rational in various kinds [29]. It has been found that the HS reference system lacks accurate properties since the relation between the thermodynamics and correlation functions are different from that for real and HS fluids [30]. Thus it is necessary to consider the attractive forces between the particles in deriving the structure factor of liquids [31,32].

    • Investigation of structure, thermodynamic and surface properties of liquid metals using square well potential

      2015, Chemical Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Liquid metals static structure factors behave like hard sphere fluids and calculations of thermo-physical and thermodynamic properties with this reference system have been found to be reasonable in many cases [13]. However, we believe with other researchers that hard sphere reference system lacks realistic properties because thermodynamics and the relation between thermodynamics with S(k) or g(r) are different for hard sphere and real fluids [14]. Hence, it is important to include attraction between the particles in deriving structure factors of liquids.

    • An effective method for hard sphere diameters of real fluids along the coexistence line vapour-liquid

      2006, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Once Pi is thus known, Eqs. (13), (3), (7), (9) and (2) provide σ. The three procedures outlined in the previous section were applied to a thirty four pure substances, classified in the following groups: (a) simple atomic liquids (neon [6], argon [7], krypton [8,9] and xenon [10]), (b) inorganic simple molecular liquids (nitrogen [11], oxygen [12] and nitrogen trifluoride [13]), (c) hydrocarbons (methane [14], ethane [14], ethylene [15], propane [14], normal butane [14], isobutane [14], pentane [16], hexane [17,18], heptane [18,19], octane [17,19], nonane [17,19], dodecane [17,19] and hexadecane [17,19]), (d) other liquids containing carbon atoms (carbon monoxide [20], carbon dioxide [21], methanol [22], carbon tetrachloride [23,24], benzene [23,24] and pentafluoroethane [25]), (e) metallic liquids (lithium [26], sodium [26], potassium [26], rubidium [26], caesium [26], mercury [27], cadmium [27] and indium [28]). The adscribed numbers to each substance refer to the main sources of data.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text