The effect of different moisture contents at ensiling on silo degradation and digestibility of structural carbohydrates of orchardgrass

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00080-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The loss of structural carbohydrates from orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) ensiled at a low (LM, 40%), medium (MM, 65%) and high moisture (HM, 76%) content was studied. The digestibility, of the four treatments (i.e. fresh material, LM, MM, and HM silages) was determined with four wethers in a 4×4 Latin square design. The fermentation quality of all silages was acceptable. The dry matter (DM) loss in all silages was also small (2–3%). The losses of water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs), hemicellulose and gross energy increased (P<0.05) with higher moisture content at ensiling. The WSC losses were 23, 70 and 77% in LM, MM and HM silages and hemicellulose losses were 7, 9 and 12%, respectively. Lower (P<0.05) crude protein (CP) and hemicellulose digestibility were observed in HM silage. Similarly, DM, gross energy and cellulose digestibility tended to be lowered in HM silage. The digestible CP was lower (P<0.05) with higher moisture content in the silage, while the digestible energy value was decreased in silages compared to fresh orchardgrass. These results indicated that the higher moisture content of orchardgrass at ensiling gave higher losses of WSC and hemicellulose resulting in decreased digestibility. However, wilting before ensiling was efficient in reducing these losses and improved digestibility.

Introduction

A lot of research on silage fermentation concerns the reduction of moisture content of forages at ensiling. This is because the wetter the material ensiled, the lower will be the critical pH value (Butler and Bailey, 1973, McDonald et al., 1991). Similarly, much research has focused on relating quality changes of ensiled material to its moisture content at ensiling (McDonald et al., 1991, Wayne et al., 1998) and at baling (Miller et al., 1967, Montgomery et al., 1986, Collins et al., 1987). However, little is known on the effect of moisture content on losses of structural carbohydrates during fermentation and on silage digestibility. McDonald and Whittenbury (1977) indicated that the bulk of the acid produced during ensiling originated from fermentation of water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC). Recent reports suggest that protein and structural carbohydrates can also be substrates for microorganisms during ensiling (McDonald et al., 1991, Yahaya et al., 2000). The success or failure of ensiling forage depends on inter-related factors, such as differences in moisture content at ensiling, forage species and growth stage at harvest, and period and length of ensiling of forage, which are not fully understood.

This study aimed to evaluate the extent of hemicellulose, cellulose and pectin losses as influenced by low (40%), medium (65%) and high (76%) moisture content of orchardgrass after 120 days of ensiling and its effect on silage digestibility.

Section snippets

Silage preparation

The orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) was harvested during the early flowering stage around June at the Obihiro University Farm, Japan. The grass was cut at a length of 2–3 cm using a mechanical forage cutter. The entire lot was thoroughly mixed and divided into three equal parts. About 65 kg fresh matter (76% moisture content) from the first part was ensiled in four plastic silos of 120 l capacity. The second and third part was wilted to moisture content of 65 and 40%, respectively. A quantity

Results and discussion

The chemical composition of the fresh orchardgrass and silages is shown in Table 1.

The hemicellulose, cellulose, pectin and gross energy tended to decrease with higher moisture content in the silage. Among silages, WSC content was higher (P<0.05) in LM compared to MM and HM silages, while EE content was higher (P<0.05) in HM compared to LM and MM silages.

Table 2 shows the fermentation quality of the three silages. While the pH content declined (P<0.05) with increased moisture content, the

Conclusion

These results indicated that the higher moisture content of orchardgrass at ensiling gave higher losses of gross energy, WSC and hemicellulose resulting in decreased digestibility and nutritive value of silage. However, wilting before ensiling may reduce these losses and improve digestibility.

References (30)

  • J.M Leatherwood et al.

    Cellulose degradation by enzymes added to ensiled forages

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1963)
  • M.J Montgomery et al.

    Effect of moisture content at baling on nutritive value of alfalfa orchardgrass hay in conventional and large round bales

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1986)
  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 1990. Official methods of Analysis, 15th Edition. Washington, DC,...
  • S.B Baker et al.

    The calorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1961)
  • Banerjee, G.C., 1988. Computation of digestible nutrients and of TDN. In: Banerjee, G.C. (Ed.), Feed and Principle of...
  • Butler, G.W., Bailey, R.W., 1973. Criteria for assessing the efficiency of the fermentation process. In: Butler, G.W.,...
  • Chamberlain, A.T., Wilkinson, J.M., 1996. The ideal silage quality. In: Chamberlain, A.T., Wilkinson, J.M. (Eds.),...
  • S.M Collins et al.

    Moisture and storage: effects on dry matter and quality losses of alfalfa in round bales

    Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. (SAE)

    (1987)
  • E.J Conway et al.

    Microdiffussion methods: ammonia and urea using buffer absorbents (revised methods for ranges >10 (g N)

    Biochem. J.

    (1942)
  • R.E Deriaz

    Routine analysis of carbohydrate and lignin in herbage

    J. Sci. Food Agric.

    (1961)
  • W.A Dewar et al.

    The hydrolysis of grass hemicelluloses during ensilage

    J. Sci. Food

    (1963)
  • D.B Duncan

    Multiple range test and multiple F-test

    Biometrics

    (1955)
  • M Frank

    Cellulose treated coastal bermudagrass silage and production of soluble carbohydrates, silage acids, and digestibility

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1986)
  • F.C George et al.

    Analysis of fiber components in feed and forages using gas–liquid chromatography

    J. Sci. Food Chem.

    (1979)
  • McDonald, P., Whittenbury, R., 1977. The silage fermentation quality. In: Butler, G.W., Bailey, R.W. (Eds.), Chemistry...
  • Cited by (25)

    • Intake, digestibility, and nitrogen balance by sheep offered ensiled tall fescue, meadow fescue or orchardgrass that was fertilized with dairy slurry or urea

      2022, Animal Feed Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, changes in WSC concentrations between pre- and post-ensiling were numerically lowest from MFC, which also indicates a lower degree of fermentation of the WSC to lactic acid in those forages. Hemicellulose concentrations decreased by 3.8 (TFS) to 17.0 % (OGC) which is consistent with that reported by Yahaya et al. (2002) and likely indicates acid or enzymatic hydrolysis of the hemicellulose. Only TFC silages approached what was suggested as acceptable lactic acid concentrations for grass silage (Kung et al., 2018).

    • Effects of malate, citrate, succinate and fumarate on fermentation, chemical composition, aerobic stability and digestibility of alfalfa silage

      2020, Animal Feed Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The increasing of DM content could lead to a lower plant respiration rate and plant enzyme activity, and ultimately result in low non-protein nitrogen (NPN) content in ensiled forage (Muck, 1987). Moreover, greater crude protein (CP), water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) and hemicellulose were observed in silages ensiled with a high DM than in silages with a low DM (Yahaya et al., 2002). Although our previous work (Ke et al., 2017, 2018) have suggested that MA and CA could promote the growth of lactic acid bacteria during ensiling, little information is available on the effects of succinic and fumaric acids on the fermentation of ensiled forages, and comparison on the effects of fumaric, malic, citric, and succinic acids, known as key intermediates in the citric acid cycle, on fermentation profiles, proteolysis, lipolysis, aerobic stability and digestibility of silage ensiled at different DM is still unknown.

    • Co-ensiling, co-composting and anaerobic co-digestion of vegetable crop residues: Product stability and effect on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics

      2017, Scientia Horticulturae
      Citation Excerpt :

      Compared to ensiling, composting is a more labor intensive treatment and demands an extra financial investment, because it requires specific tools to monitor and manage the compost piles (Viaene et al., 2016). Furthermore, to ensure a good composting process, bulking agents with a higher C/N ratio should be added (Huang et al., 2004a), while a proper ensiling process requires mixing drier biomass with fresh crop residues (Yahaya et al., 2002). This implies that the biomass (i.e. woody material for composting and straw for ensiling) must be readily available for the farmer, which is not always the case (Viaene et al., 2016).

    • Short communication: The effects of dry matter and length of storage on the composition and nutritive value of alfalfa silage

      2016, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Luchini et al. (1997) also found that DM content did not influence fiber content of alfalfa silages stored in O2-limiting and tower silos. In contrast, Yahaya et al. (2002) reported that high-moisture orchardgrass silage (23.7% DM) was lower in NDF-D compared with fresh forage, but when wilted to higher DM contents, NDF-D was actually higher than fresh material. In our study, there was an interaction (P = 0.03) between DM content at ensiling and length of storage for NDF-D primarily because NDF-D was greater and similar in fresh forages but was slightly lower from d 45 onward for HDM compared with LDM silage, with the former being slightly lower.

    • Effect of ensilaged vegetable crop residue amendments on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics

      2015, Scientia Horticulturae
      Citation Excerpt :

      The final pH and biodegradability may hence be indicators of the success of the ensilaging process and resulting silage quality. To obtain a high quality silage a moisture content of more than 75% should be avoided as this leads to undesirable fermentation in later ensilage phases (Chedly and Lee, 2000; Yahaya et al., 2002). Given the low DM content of vegetable crop residues a material with a high organic matter (OM) and DM content should be added to ensure proper ensilage.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text