Elsevier

Journal of Membrane Science

Volume 194, Issue 1, 30 November 2001, Pages 15-32
Journal of Membrane Science

Effects of ultrafiltration membrane surface properties on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm initiation for the purpose of reducing biofouling

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00468-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Biofilm fouling is one of the major obstacles hindering the use of membranes in water processing systems. There are a series of events that take place during biofilm formation, one of the most interesting and important issues of biofouling is the initial attachment of microorganisms to the surface. Therefore, effects that surface properties have on biofilm fouling are important to attachment and were examined. Hydrophobicity, surface charge and roughness were measured for several polymeric surfaces of interest in water processing membrane systems. These surfaces were then subjected to conditioning layer formation and biofilm fouling, both of which were quantified. The results show that biofilm initiation by a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa increases as the surface becomes more rough and more hydrophobic, while fouling is minimal when surface charge is minimized and increases with increasing charge, whether positive or negative.

Introduction

Biofilm fouling is a persistent problem for almost any water-based application. Biofilms foul ship hulls, clog water lines, reduce heat transfer in heat exchangers, infect medical implants and cause numerous other problems in water processing systems [1], [2], [3]. One of the most problematic industrial biofilm formations is the fouling of membranes. This is due to the active transport of bacteria (cause by the tangential force of the membrane flux) to the membrane surface causing biofilm formation, reducing the flux of water through the membrane [4], [5], [6]. Even a small amount of fouling can cause significant loss of flux.

The attachment of bacterial cells to the surface of the membrane is the critical first step of biofilm fouling. There are many factors affecting cellular attachment, but one of the most important is the surface property of the material. These factors affect the speed and strength of any attachment [1], [7], [8], [9]. This study, therefore, focused on the effects that surface properties have on bacterial biofilm formation.

The pH and dissolved chemically active compounds can affect the chemistry of some surfaces. Most conventional membrane materials are relatively non-reactive, so the adsorption of chemicals to the surface is responsible for most of the changes in surface properties. This adsorption is referred to as conditioning layer formation in the study of biofilm formation [9], [10], [11].

This study measured the three surface properties most closely linked to biofilm fouling, and correlated them with the adsorption of conditioning layer chemicals and the initial coverage of bacteria on the surface. Thus, hydrophobicity, surface charge and roughness, properties were measured and have all been associated with biofilm fouling [1], [12], [13], [14]. These direct quantitative measurements of surface properties in combination with measurements of conditioning layer formation and biofilm fouling area provide important direct correlations and mechanistic insights into biofilm fouling, particularly the early stages where the surface properties control biofilm formation. Measurements on some 30 samples materials confirmed that hydrophilic, electrically neutral, smooth surfaces are the least susceptible to biofilm fouling.

Section snippets

Experimental materials and procedures

Biofilm forming bacteria, surfaces on which they were grown and the aqueous environment constitute the materials and methods of this study.

Determination of hydrophobicity by the measurement of contact angle

Contact angle, which can greatly affect bacterial attachment to surfaces, was used as a measure of hydrophobicity [13], [31]. It is known that cells can attach to both hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces [6], [8], but it has been suggested that bacterial attachment to hydrophobic surfaces is the stronger of the two attachments [8], possibly through conditioning layer chemicals. Although the cells have more hydrophilic areas on the surface of their membranes, these sites are highly attracted to

Conditioning layer formation experiments

Conditioning layer formation, aside from being a problem itself, is considered to be an important factor in the adsorption and initiation of biofilms [6], [8], [35]. The factors involved and the extent to which conditioning layers affect biofilm fouling are not completely understood. The analysis of conditioning layer formation, in parallel with the biofilm formation studies, has the potential to elucidate a more thorough understanding of the role of conditioning layers in biofilm formation.

The

Surface property measurements

Surface property measurements of the various surface materials were analyzed, an abbreviated list is shown in Table 1. The contact angle and zeta potential measurement data shown are averages of 12 measurements, while the roughness data shown are averages of 9 measurements. Standard deviations are shown for all of the results.

The results in Table 1 show that a wide range of each of the surface properties was tested. Contact angles range from 0 to 113° with the graft PEG materials showing a

Conclusions

A number of materials were tested in this study and the data show that hydrophilic, electrically neutral, smooth surfaces are much less likely to foul with P. aeruginosa than hydrophobic, charged, rough surfaces. Control of these three properties, however, only controls the rate of early biofilm initiation under the rigorous (high cell titer) conditions tested. None of the surfaces tested were able to completely prevent biofilm fouling. Even the surfaces most resistant to biofilm formation had

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Drs. William Krantz, Mark Hernandez, and John Pellegrino for their guidance and use of equipment. The work performed by Lee Halevi and Jill Fletcher in setting up analyses was very beneficial to the project and appreciated. A special thanks goes to the Membrane Applied Science and Technology Industry/University Collaborative Research Center (MAST), the US Army (TARDEC) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) for providing the interest and funding that made this

References (42)

  • M. Elimelech et al.

    Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer

    Desalination

    (1994)
  • W.G. Characklis, K.C. Marshall, Biofilms, Wiley, New York,...
  • R.F. Brady, Fluoropolymers, Chemistry in Britain, 1990, pp....
  • H.F. Ridgeway, C.A. Justice, C. Whittaker, D.G. Argo, B.H. Olson, Biofilm fouling of RO membranes — its nature and...
  • M. Morra et al.

    Bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces: a critical review of surface thermodynamic approaches

    J. Biomater. Sci.

    (1997)
  • L.F. Melo, T.R. Bott, M. Fletcher, B. Capdeville, Biofilms — Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers,...
  • R.E. Baier et al.

    Surface microfouling during the induction period

    J. Heat Trans.

    (1983)
  • C.E. Zobell

    The effect of solid surfaces upon bacterial activity

    J. Bact.

    (1943)
  • D.J. Gerhart et al.

    Rapid and inexpensive quantification of the combined polar components of surface wetability: applications to biofouling

    Biofouling

    (1992)
  • K.C. Marshall et al.

    Cell surface hydrophocity and the orientation of certain bacteria at interfaces

    Arch. Mikrobiol.

    (1973)
  • J.W. Costerton, H. Anwar, Pseudomonas aeruginosa: The microbe and pathogen. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections and...
  • Cited by (218)

    • Campylobacter biofilms

      2022, Microbiological Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text