Elsevier

Food Policy

Volume 23, Issue 1, February 1998, Pages 55-71
Food Policy

India's maize seed industry in transition: changing roles for the public and private sectors

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(98)00014-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent policy reforms have brought major changes to India's maize seed industry. Since seed laws were liberalized in the late 1980s, private investment in maize research has risen sharply, and seed companies have captured a significant share of the market. Although the emergence of a flourishing private seed industry has benefited many producers and consumers, calls for complete privatization of the industry are misguided. Profit-oriented firms are unlikely to assume functions that cannot easily be exploited for commercial gain, so government agencies will continue to play an important role in supporting basic research, conducting applied research targeted at marginal environments, collecting and disseminating market information, and establishing and enforcing industry standards. Public-sector involvement in commercial seed production seems destined to decrease, however, as the private seed industry gains in strength.

Introduction

Since India's seed laws were liberalized in the late 1980s, private companies have captured a significant share of the national market for maize seed.1 The rapid growth of the private maize seed industry has profound implications for the government agencies charged with developing improved production technologies for India's millions of maize farmers. Long accustomed to a virtual absence of competition, these agencies have seen their territory invaded by profit-driven seed companies whose superior products, aggressive marketing techniques, and deep pockets make them formidable competitors.

The rise of the private seed industry has brought substantial benefits to many producers and consumers of maize. Private seed companies do not necessarily represent an unmitigated blessing, however. Concern has been expressed in some circles that in their quest for profits, seed companies are bound to neglect farmers in marginal production zones who do not represent an attractive market for hybrid seed.2 Furthermore, warn some analysts, even conceding that seed companies are doing a good job in many respects, there is a need to ensure that their activities complement, rather than compete with, efforts already being carried out by government agencies.

This article examines the organization and performance of India's maize seed industry and addresses the question of where the ongoing liberalization process is likely to lead. The discussion proceeds in three stages. First, recent changes in seed industry policy are briefly reviewed. Second, data are presented to highlight the relative strengths and weaknesses of the public and private sectors in carrying out research and development, seed production and conditioning, and seed distribution activities. Third, policy issues are described that will have to be resolved if India's maize seed industry is to remain dynamic, efficient, and responsive to the needs of producers and consumers.

Section snippets

Data collection activities

Data reported in this article were collected over a two-year period through a series of surveys conducted as part of a collaborative study involving the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). (For details, see Singh et al., 1995.) Information on the level of public-sector investment in maize breeding research and research outputs was collected in 1994 through a questionnaire administered to the leaders of India's 27

Evolution of seed industry policy

The passage in 1966 of the Central Seed Act laid the legal foundation for India's present-day seed industry. In addition to setting out regulations governing the production and distribution of seed, the Central Seed Act prescribed certification standards and assigned responsibility for their enforcement to the state governments. A distinguishing feature of the Central Seed Act was that it maintained effective control over seed of most staple food crops firmly in the hands of government

Public sector research

Agricultural research in India is planned and coordinated by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). Since it is not itself an implementing agency, ICAR has established a network of institutes, bureaus, and coordinated projects to carry out specific research activities. The main component of the national maize program is the ICAR Directorate of Maize Research (DMR), which was formed in 1957 to promote and coordinate maize research throughout India.

Public sector seed production

Both the central government (through the National Seeds Corporation, or NSC) and some state governments (through various state seeds corporations, or SSCs) produce maize seed on a commercial basis. These agencies do not actually produce seed themselves; instead, they employ contract growers, who are supplied with parent seed obtained from ICAR research stations or agricultural universities. The contract growers operate under the supervision of NSC or SSC technical staff. Commercial seed

Public sector distribution

Maize seed produced by the NSC and SSCs is sold directly from government warehouses or through dealers located in major population centers. The public seed agencies invest little in promotion and advertising, because the public varieties and hybrids they sell are well known to farmers.

Continuing need for public-sector participation

The rapid growth of the private seed industry has raised questions about the appropriate role of India's public maize seed industry. Citing the extensive budgetary support that goes to support the public agencies responsible for maize research and development, some observers have called for their activities to be scaled back. Others have adopted a less extreme view, arguing that the state must maintain a presence in the maize seed industry for economic and political reasons, and that the real

References (10)

  • C Pray

    The potential impact of liberalizing India's seed laws

    Food Policy

    (1990)
  • Byerlee, D., Morris, M. L. and Lopez-Pereira, M. A. (1993) Hybrid maize and the small-scale farmer: economic and policy...
  • CIMMYT (1994) CIMMYT World Maize Facts and Trends, CIMMYT, Mexico,...
  • Government of India (1988) Indian Minimum Seed Certification Standards, Central Seed Certification Board, Ministry of...
  • Jaffee, S. and Srivastava, J. (1992) Seed system development: the appropriate roles of the private and public sectors,...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Towards better metrics and policymaking for seed system development: Insights from Asia's seed industry

    2016, Agricultural Systems
    Citation Excerpt :

    Multinational seed companies with strong R&D programs and product lines played a central role in these markets, operating independently or in joint ventures with domestic seed companies in India (e.g., Joshi et al., 2005; Pray and Nagarajan, 2014), Pakistan (Rana, 2014), Thailand (Napasintuwong, 2014), and elsewhere. In India, for example, liberalization of seed market policy during the late 1980s encouraged the rapid growth of a private sector-led maize seed industry which, in turn, fuelled significant yield growth in maize (Morris et al., 1998; Pal et al., 1998; Pray et al., 2001; Ramaswami, 2002). The effects of this industry growth have been so substantial that the annual growth rates of yield, output, and area under maize cultivation during the period 2004–05 to 2013–14 were 2.9, 2.5, and 5.5%, respectively (KPMG/FICCI/NCDEX, 2014).

  • Estimating the adoption of Bt eggplant in India: Who Benefits from public-private partnership?

    2007, Food Policy
    Citation Excerpt :

    This narrow portfolio is largely due to the fact that the private sector, which concentrates on large lucrative markets, dominates the development and commercialization of transgenic crops. Under such conditions, there is the risk that certain technologies, which are of particular relevance for poor farmers, are not being developed (Morris et al., 1998; FAO, 2004; Naylor et al., 2004). The situation is being aggravated by biotechnology acceptance problems and widespread public distrust against multinational corporations – factors which have increased the cost and time required to channel transgenic technologies through biosafety processes (Pray et al., 2005; Qaim and Matuschke, 2005).

  • Seed industry and seed policy reforms in Bangladesh: Impacts and implications

    2018, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text