Metrics of scale in remote sensing and GIS

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-2434(01)85002-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The term scale has many meanings, some of which survive the transition from analog to digital representations of information better than others. Specifically, the primary metric of scale in traditional cartography, the representative fraction, has no well-defined meaning for digital data. Spatial extent and spatial resolution are both meaningful for digital data, and their ratio, symbolized as L/S, is dimensionless. L/S appears confined in practice to a narrow range. The implications of this observation are explored in the context of Digital Earth, a vision for an integrated geographic information system. It is shown that despite the very large data volumes potentially involved, Digital Earth is nevertheless technically feasible with today's technology.

Résumé

Le terme échelle a plusieurs significations, dont certaines survivent la transition de représentations de l’information de l’analogique vers le numérique mieux que d’autres. En particulier, le premier système métrique d’échelle en cartographie traditionnelle, à savoir la fraction représentative n’a pas un sens bien défini pour des données numériques. Une dimension spatiale et une résolution spatiale sont toutes deux pleines de signification pour des données numériques et leur rapport, représenté par le symbole L/S, est sans dimension. En pratique L/S parait confiné dans une étendue étroite. Les implications de cette observation sont explorées dans le contexte de “Terre Numérique”, une vision pour un système d’information géographique intégré. Il est montré qu’en dépit des très grands volumes des données potentiellement concernées, une “Terre Numérique” est techniquement réalisable avec la technologie d’aujourd’hui.

Resumen

El término escala tiene muchos significados, de los cuales algunos sobreviven mejor que otros la transición entre las representaciones análogas de la información y las digitales. Específicamente, la métrica primária de la escala en cartografía tradicional, la fracción representativa, no tiene significado bien definido en el caso de datos digitales. Extensión espacial y resolución espacial tienen sentido para datos digitales, y su relación simbolizada como L/S no tiene dimensión. La relación L/S parece ser confinada en la práctica a un rango estrecho. Se exploran las implicaciones de esta observación en el contexto de Tierra Digital, una visión para un sistema integrado de información geográfica. Se muestra que, a pesar de los amplios volúmenes de datos potencialmente involucrados, Tierra Digital es tecnicamente factible con la tecnología actual.

References (6)

  • P.M. Atkinson

    Geographical information science: Geocomputation and non-stationarity

    Progress in Physical Geography

    (2001)
  • M.F. Goodchild

    Communicating geographic information in a digital age

    Annals of the Association of American Geographers

    (2000)
  • M.F. Goodchild et al.

    Scale in a digital geographic world

    Geographical and Environmental Modelling

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

  • Identifying important at-sea areas for seabirds using species distribution models and hotspot mapping

    2020, Biological Conservation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Maximum Curvature, which does not involve local smoothing, resulted in hotspots with greater similarity to estimated UD contours in Shags, but even in this case similarity was much lower than the corresponding similarity indices observed between Maximum Curvature hotspots and utilisation distributions in the other three species. One potential explanation is that because the maximum foraging range observed in Shags during the study was 35 km compared to 300 km in Kittiwakes, 340 km in Guillemots and 305 km in Razorbills the spatial scale (sensu Goodchild, 2001) of our analyses differs between the species. Specifically, due to the interaction between relatively limited foraging range of Shags and the grid resolution used for analysis, hotspots defined using Maximum Curvature or Getis-Ord hotspot boundaries tend to be coarser or blockier than the underlying utilisation distributions resulting in relatively low similarity even when high density areas are successfully identified.

  • Evaluation of climate and human effects on the hydrology and water quality of Burdur Lake, Turkey

    2019, Journal of African Earth Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Using multitemporal satellite data aligned and registered properly, comparisons can be made between and among years for specific months (Pozdnyakov et al., 2005; Durduran, 2009). Integration of the Remote Sensing (RS) with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are an essential tool for analyzing and extracting more reliable and consistent information by using satellite image as a base data (Bausmith and Leinhardth, 1997; Goodchild, 2001; Jaiswal et al., 2002; Durduran, 2009). This technique is quite useful monitoring of water bodies, long-term climate change and water pollution.

  • Sensitivity of multiresolution segmentation to spatial extent

    2019, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
    Citation Excerpt :

    A scene can therefore be segmented at a variety of scale levels, ideally emulating the scale levels of geographical features distinguishable in that scene (Costa et al., 2018). However, the scale of segmentation outputs depends on the scale characteristics of the input imagery, namely spatial resolution and spatial extent as the most important components of the geospatial data (Goodchild, 2001). While the relationship between segmentation scale and spatial resolution has been relatively well addressed, the impact of spatial extent on segmentation results has been basically ignored.

  • A LiDAR-based decision-tree classification of open water surfaces in an Arctic delta

    2015, Remote Sensing of Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    Selecting a boundary, whether in the field with a GPS receiver or during the digitization process, is susceptible to operator-based subjective decisions over boundary locations. Jahn and Dunne (1997) outline several criteria that influence subjective interpretations, which can occur in remote sensing feature detection; including biases resulting from previous experience or due to the level of vector generalisation during the digitization process (Goodchild, 2001; Sarti, Malladi, & Sethian, 2000). In most channel/bank situations, the boundary between land and water is easy to interpret.

  • Remote sensing and GIS analysis for mapping spatio-temporalchanges of erosion and deposition of two Mediterranean river deltas: The case of the Axios and Aliakmonas rivers, Greece

    2015, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed, the detection of coastline changes using EO data has gained high importance over recent decades, since satellites are able to provide digital imagery in infrared spectral bands where the land–water interface can be well-defined (Ekercin, 2007; Durduran, 2010). Furthermore, EO data can be combined with geographic information systems (GIS) to provide an effective set of tools for analysing and extracting spatial information to support reliable and consistent decision making (Bausmith and Leinhardth, 1997; Goodchild, 2001; Jaiswal et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2005; Durduran, 2010; Gens, 2010). This integration with EO datasets provides an excellent framework for data capture, storage, synthesis measurements and analysis, all of which are essential in coastline changes investigations.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text