Critical loads for nitrogen deposition and their exceedance at European scale

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(98)80087-0Get rights and content

Abstract

In Europe serious problems associated with emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia are related to eutrophication and acidification. Impacts of eutrophication in terrestrial ecosystems are associated with changes in floristic composition and in ecosystem function and stability. Various activities have been initiated to assess the risk posed by nitrogen deposition for negotiations concerning the UN/ECE NOx Protocol. As there are difficulties in mapping critical loads for nitrogen, two different methods are presented here at European scale. One method uses a sensitivity approach linked to data for empirically derived critical loads; the other method uses a nitrogen saturation approach which sums quantitative values for acceptable long-term removal rates of nitrogen from the ecosystem and accumulation in soil organic matter. Resulting critical load maps show significant areas across Europe that are potentially sensitive to nitrogen deposition. Generally, the spatial distribution of sensitivity shows similarities using both approaches. However, the range of empirical critical loads in the literature determined for certain vegetation types is greater than those calculated using the saturation approach. A comparison with 1990 total nitrogen deposition does reveal a similar distribution of exceedance, but only when the lower end of the empirical critical load range is used. There are uncertainties associated with both methods nevertheless they do illustrate that substantial areas across Europe may be at risk from deleterious impacts caused by nitrogen deposition.

References (37)

  • R. Aerts et al.

    Heathlands: Patterns and Processes in a Changing Environment

    (1993)
  • T. Batey

    Nitrogen cycling in upland pastures of the United Kingdom

  • T. Batey

    Nitrogen cycling in upland pastures of the UK

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London

    (1982)
  • M. Berdén et al.

    Soil Acidification — Extent, Causes and Consequences

    SNV Report 3292, Solna, Sweden

    (1987)
  • R. Bobbink et al.

    Empirical nitrogen critical loads for natural and semi-natural ecosystems

  • S.J.M. Caporn et al.

    Critical loads of nitrogen for upland heather (Calluna vulgaris)

  • M.J. Chadwick et al.

    The relative sensitivity of ecosystems in Europe to acidic depositions

    A preliminary assessment of the sensitivity of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems

    Perspectives in Energy

    (1991)
  • H. Ellenberg

    Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe

    (1988)
  • H. Ellenberg

    Floristic changes due to nitrogen deposition in central Europe

  • EMEP

    EMEP/MSC-W Report 1/95

    (1995)
  • J.R. Gosz

    Nitrogen cycling in coniferous ecosystems

  • P. Gundersen et al.

    Nitrification in forest soils: effects from nitrogen deposition on soil acidification and aluminium release

    Review of Environmental Contaminant Toxicology

    (1990)
  • J.-P. Hettelingh et al.

    The use of critical loads in emission reduction agreements in Europe

    Water Air and Soil Pollution

    (1995)
  • INDITE

    Impact of Nitrogen Deposition on Terrestrial Ecosystems

  • P. Ineson

    Denitrification data quoted in calculating critical loads for N to forest soils by Warfvinge, P., Sverdrup, H. and Rosén, K.

  • Cited by (21)

    • A framework to estimate biodiversity loss and associated costs due to nitrogen emissions from single power plants

      2019, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ‘health check’ carried out by the European Commission in 2006 indicated that about 80% of the habitat types are still under threat (Commission of the European Communities, 2009; Schoukens and Cliquet, 2016). In the context of the European Natura 2000 Network (Commission of the European Communities, 2009), habitat types have been classified in terms of their critical deposition loads (CDL) (Kuylenstierna et al., 1998; Sutton et al., 2014; Van Dobben et al., 2006; Vivanco et al., 2018). The CDL reflects “the limit above which there is a risk that the quality of the habitat will significantly be affected by atmospheric nitrogen deposition” (Van Dobben et al., 2006).

    • Nitrogen critical loads using biodiversity-related critical limits

      2011, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, despite reductions in nitrogen (N) emissions (oxides by 41% and ammonia by 17%), there has been continuous widespread exceedance of nutrient N (Kuylenstierna et al., 1998; Hettelingh et al., 2007). Concern that chronic (elevated) reactive (oxidised and reduced) N deposition may result in long-term negative effects on natural ecosystems (e.g., acidification, eutrophication, loss of biodiversity), has prompted many international conferences (e.g., Grennfelt and Thörnelöf, 1992; Hornung et al., 1995; special issues Environmental Pollution 102:1, 1998; Ecological Applications 20:1, 2010). In recent years there has been a tendency to consider the basis of modelled N critical loads, i.e., the critical chemical limits (the violation of which leads to ‘harmful effects’), as insufficient for characterising adverse ecosystem effects, especially in efforts to link biodiversity to abiotic factors amenable to ‘management’, such as deposition.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text