Determination of hydrodynamic drag forces and drag coefficients on human leg/foot model during knee exercise

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00070-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of this laboratory experiment was to measure hydrodynamic drag forces in barefoot/hydro-boot conditions and accordingly, to determine the coefficients of drag on human leg/foot model during simulated knee extension–flexion exercise.

Design. The prosthesis of the human lower leg was set in a water tank and connected into an isokinetic force dynamometer to measure resistive forces during knee motion.

Background. Quantifying resistance for aquatic exercises has been a challenge in hydrotherapy. The use of models of foot/leg provides a practical method to calculate coefficients of drag and to estimate resistance for rehabilitation purposes in musculoskeletal and amputee patients.

Methods. The dynamometer produced constant angular velocities of 250°/s, 270°/s and 300°/s to the prosthesis. The baseline for measurements was performed in barefoot condition. A hydro-boot was used to study effects of increased frontal area (30%) of the leg on drag forces and coefficients.

Results. The maximal drag force values were 61 N (300°/s) in barefoot and 270 N (270°/s) in hydro-boot condition. Related drag coefficient values during the range of motion were from 0.3 to 0.1 and from 1 to 0.8, respectively.

Conclusions. Drag force and related drag coefficient were highest during the early part of extension (150–140° flexion) as the model was opposing the lift forces with the influence of water resistance. The effect of velocity was remarkable on drag forces but minimal on drag coefficient values.

Relevance

The drag forces and coefficients of this experiment can be clinically utilised to calculate hydrodynamic forces to develop progressive knee exercise programs as well as to design of prosthesis for amputee patients.

Introduction

In swimming research, laboratory experiments have been employed to measure hydrodynamic forces on human hand/arm models to better understand the relationship between the swimming man and the water environment. For the calculation of propulsion in freestyle swimming, drag and lift forces have been measured to determine the coefficients of drag and lift [1], [2]. In hydrotherapy, similar approaches are needed to analyse mechanical characteristics of underwater movements of human leg/foot and prosthesis. This kind of basic information is necessary to develop progressive water exercise programs for patients with lower leg disorders as well as effective aquatic exercises and well-fitted prosthesis for amputees [3].

An object moving through the water with a constant velocity, an additional resistance force due to fluid drag is acting on the object. The direction of the drag force is opposite to the moving line. The drag due to turbulence behind the object is referred to as pressure or form drag while the quantity of friction between the boundary layer of the water and the object is called surface drag [4], [5]. In addition, the drag force can be divided into passive and active drag. The former is the resistance by the water that an object experiences in an unchanging posture and the latter is the water resistance related to the swimming motion [6]. Passive drag can be measured by towing the swimmer through the water and drag forces (Fd) can be calculated by the general fluid equation [7]Fd=1/2ρAv2Cd,where ρ is the fluid density, A the projected frontal area of the object, v the velocity and Cd the drag coefficient. According to the hydrodynamic principles, the force required to overcome the fluid drag is effected by the size and shape of the projected area. Additionally, the drag force is a function of the velocity squared, which means that the doubling of the speed quadruples the drag force. The coefficient of drag is related to the shape, streamlining and the Reynolds number of an object. Cd can be calculated if the total drag force is measured, for example, by force dynamometer [4].

The present laboratory experiment was designed to measure underwater resistive forces exerted during simulated knee extension exercise. The specific aims of this study were (1) to measure hydrodynamic drag forces in order to determine the coefficients of drag on human leg/foot model in barefoot condition and (2) to measure hydrodynamic drag forces to determine drag coefficients with hydro-boot condition in order to examine the effects of increased leg frontal area on drag forces and coefficients of drag.

Section snippets

Methods

In order to elaborate the resistive forces at the present study, a rubber covered prosthesis filled with wax was made to simulate the adult human leg/foot in knee extension–flexion movement. The length of the model was 0.5 m (see Fig. 1(a)) and the projected frontal area was 0.07 m2. The ankle of the model was placed in 20° of plantar flexion which demonstrated the average data of a pilot study in four adults (two males, two females). The movement of the ankles during knee extension was

Results

The day to day reproducibility of the measurements was determined by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) for force curves during the whole RoM (150–20°, 10° increment). The values demonstrated high reproducibility with CV between 1.1% and 1.7%. The force curves recorded at three different angular velocities (250°/s, 270°/s and 300°/s) during barefoot condition and at two angular velocities (250°/s and 270°/s) in hydro-boot condition are shown in Fig. 2(a) and (b). The force values are

Discussion

The results of this study indicated that the values of drag forces and related Cd values were dependent on the orientation of the model within the RoM in barefoot and hydro-boot condition. Highest values were shown during early part of extension movement at large knee angles. Drag forces and coefficients of drag showed higher values in hydro-boot condition as compared to barefoot condition. The present method of measuring underwater forces by isokinetic dynamometer was reproducible and useful

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Finnish Academy and Ministry of Education in the form of a TULES Graduate School Scholarship.

References (7)

  • Schleihauf RE. A hydrodynamic analysis of swimming propulsion. In: Terauds J, Bedingfield E. editors. Swimming III....
  • Berger M, de Groot G, Hollander P. Hydrodynamic drag and lift forces on human hand/arm model. Journal of Biomechanics...
  • Basmajian JV, Wolf SL. Therapeutic exercise, fifth ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins,...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text