Finite element analysis of the cervico-trochanteric stemless femoral prosthesis
Introduction
Since the introduction of Charnley hip prosthesis in the early 1960s, total hip arthroplasty (THA) has proven to be a successful surgical procedure due to the improvements of prosthetic design, biomaterials and surgical technique (Harris, 1984; Callaghan, 1992). However, there is still a great concern of bone loss associated with stress shielding and osteolysis (Kroger et al., 1997; McCarthy et al., 1991; Chao and Coventry, 1981). Stress shielding is a mechanical cause of bone loss and is characterized by adaptive remodeling changes in the proximal femoral cortical bone following stem implantation (Marchetti et al., 1996; Lewis et al., 1984; Engh and Bobyn, 1988). The proposed mechanism of stress shielding is based on Wolff’s law of remodeling. The redistribution of stress results in a decrease in the bone mineral density around the proximal femur, which may influence the longevity of the prosthesis. Osteolysis is another cause of bone loss following THA. This biological process of periprosthetic bone resorption is associated with the generation of particulate debris, especially the polyethylene wear particles (Shih et al., 1994; Murray and Rushton, 1992). To eliminate these two well-known complications of THA, the surface replacement arthroplasty was once widely used in the 1980s (Trentani and Vaccarino, 1981; Head, 1981; Bassett et al., 1982; Buechel et al., 1994; Herbeterts et al., 1983). However, it was proved a failure in design because of significant interface stress concentration (Huiskes et al., 1985). New types of stemless prostheses were designed in the 1990s to solve the clinical problems of stress shielding and osteolysis with reduced interface stress that ensures secure fixation (Munting and Verhelpen, 1995; Shih et al., 1997).
In the current study, we used the finite element method to investigate the biomechanical performance of a newly designed cervico-trochanteric (C-T) stemless prosthesis. Three-dimensional finite element models (FEMs) were created for the intact femur, C-T implanted femur, and the traditional stem-type porous-coated anatomic (PCA) implanted femur. The stress distributions on the femur were analyzed and compared among each models. The effects of using two or three fixation screws on the C-T prosthesis were also investigated.
Section snippets
Methods
The newly designed C-T femoral prosthesis and the fixation screws were made of Titanium and are shown in Fig. 1. The three holes are made with inner threads for initial locking after fastening of the screws. The traditional PCA femoral prosthesis (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ, USA) used in this investigation is a stem-type design made of cobalt–chrome (Co–Cr) alloy. The femora used for the current study were commercially available synthetic products (Pacific Research Laboratory Inc., Vashon
Results
The von Mises equivalent stress distributions on the medial side for each of the femoral models: intact femur, C-T (with two screws) implanted femur, C-T (with three screws) implanted femur, and the PCA implanted femur were obtained from the analyses and shown in Fig. 4 with gray-scale fringes. As shown in Fig. 4, there was a local high stress on the region of the proximal femur adjacent to the distal edge of the C-T prosthesis. This was caused by the stress-concentration effect near the edge
Discussion
The finite element method has become a useful tool in analyzing the stresses in structures of complex shapes, loading and material behavior. Numerous applications in orthopedics have been presented and proven to be a successful tool in predicting the mechanical characteristics of skeletal parts in interesting circumstances (Cody et al., 1999; Testi et al., 1999). The convergence of FEM model plays an important role on the reliability of the final results, whereas the method used in this study
Conclusions
The present study demonstrates that the stress shielding of the C-T implanted femur was significantly eliminated as compared to that of the traditional PCA implanted femur. Moreover, the C-T prosthesis possesses the following features, and might be an alternative for traditional stem-type prostheses for clinical application after future clinical trials: (1) prevention of the stress-shielding effect (decrease bone atrophy); (2) prevention of endosteal osteolysis; (3) preservation of bone stock
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the grant from the National Science Council of the Republic of China (grant no. NSC-89-2320-B-033-001-M08). The computing facilities provided by the National Center for High-Performance Computing are greatly appreciated.
References (24)
- et al.
Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA
J. Biomech.
(1999) - et al.
Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacement: a more realistic model
J. Biomech.
(1995) - et al.
Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction
J. Biomech.
(1997) - et al.
Fixation and effect on bone strain pattern of a stemless hip prosthesis
J. Biomech.
(1995) - et al.
New concepts-biomechanical studies of a newly design femoral prosthesis (cevico-trochanter prosthesis)
Clin. Biomech.
(1997) - et al.
Risk of fracture in elderly patients: a new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis
Comput. Meth. Prog. Bio.
(1999) - et al.
Radiology of failed surface replacement total hip arthroplasty
Am. J. Roentgenol.
(1982) - et al.
Osteolysis around uncemented acetabular components of cobalt–chrome surface replacement hip arthroplasty
Clin. Orthop. Relat. R
(1994) Total hip arthroplasty: clinical perspective
Clin. Orthop. Relat. R
(1992)- et al.
Fracture of femoral component after total hip replacement. An analysis of 58 cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.
(1981)
The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty
Clin. Orthop. Relat. R
Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement
Clin. Orthop. Relat. R
Cited by (41)
Topology optimization of bone using cubic material design and evolutionary methods based on internal remodeling
2019, Mechanics Research Communications‘Pre-launch’ finite element analysis of a short-stem total hip arthroplasty system consisting of two implant types
2019, Clinical BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :We know that a longer implant might cause distal load transfer, causing stress shielding and consecutive bone loss in the proximal femur (Lerch et al., 2012b; Sano et al., 2008; Stukenborg-Colsman et al., 2012; Tai et al., 2003). In an analysis of a stemless femoral implant, stress shielding was significantly reduced as compared to that of a conventional straight stem (Tai et al., 2003). FE analysis of the Thrust Plate Prosthesis (Centerpulse Orthopedics, Winterthur, Switzerland), which was developed to transmit load more physiologically, showed increased bone formation in the medial proximal region of the femur (Lerch et al., 2012a; Taylor et al., 2004).
Impact of hip anatomical variations on the cartilage stress: A finite element analysis towards the biomechanical exploration of the factors that may explain primary hip arthritis in morphologically normal subjects
2014, Clinical BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :Such angles can have large inter-individual variations. Large alteration of these angles can be found in pathologies such as hip dysplasia, coxa vara, and coxa valga, where anatomical hip geometry falls out of the normal range (Tai et al., 2003). In those cases, the altered hip joint morphology has significant consequences on the forces and contact areas experienced at the joint surface (Tibor and Leunig, 2012).
Biomechanical effects of bone-implant fitness and screw breakage on the stability and stress performance of the nonstemmed hip system
2014, Clinical BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :The biomechanical merits of anatomically fitting cup include the initial stability of the cup itself, the stronger support of the neck cortex, and less influence on the femoral biomechanics (Huang et al., 2010). Even with anatomical fitness, the bone–cup construct is further stabilized by using screws to link the bone and the cup (Munting and Verhelpen, 1995; Qian et al., 2003; Tai et al., 2003). Several cup–screw mechanisms have been proposed and detailed comparisons between them have yet to be extensively investigated (Viceconti et al., 2001).