Structural relationship between V2O5 (0 0 1) surface and the bulk: cluster bulk termination models

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(03)00186-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Ab initio periodic and cluster Hartree–Fock calculations have been performed to investigate the structural and electronic properties of both V2O5 bulk and (001) surface. A full bulk geometry optimization yields to good VO lengths which are found to be in agreement with experiment. The relationship between the bulk and surface structure is investigated by different cluster models with optimized bulk termination. The validity of this approach is discussed through the experimental and theoretical surface results.

Introduction

Vanadium oxides are of great scientific importance, they are widely used as prototype in chemical and electronic industries [1] for their interesting physical and chemical properties. These materials exist in many crystallographic forms with different stoichiometries, where vanadium exhibits various oxidation states from a structure to another. Vanadium pentoxide, V2O5, presents very interesting properties, it is used in catalysis [2], [3], as a n-type semiconductor [4], and as electrochemical material [5]. It has been a subject of many experimental studies [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], as well as theoretical one [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], its catalytic properties depend essentially on their ability to provide surface oxygens as a reactant in oxidation of hydrocarbons.

V2O5 has an orthorhombic structure. The unit cell contains 14 atoms, 4 vanadium and 10 oxygen atoms (Fig. 1). The positions of the atoms in the unit cell and the crystallographic parameters are given in Table 1. This compound has a layered structure composed of corner and edge sharing VO5 square pyramids, alternatively pointing upward and downward in the [0 0 1] direction [6], with only weak Van der Waals type interaction between the layers. In the full crystal, the building block is a deformed octahedron (VO6). Within each layer, one can distinguish V chains (VO5) in the [0 1 0] direction connected by oxygen bridges in the [0 1 0] and [1 0 0] directions. The shortest bond length corresponds to double vanadyl bond (1.57 Å) and the longest one to weak Van der Waals bond (2.791 Å) in the [0 0 1] direction. Hence, V2O5 presents an easy cleavage plane in this direction. Three different kinds of oxygen atoms exist: the vanadyl oxygen on the top of the vanadium with double bond coordinated with one metal, the oxygen chain coordinated to two vanadium atoms O2 (the index corresponds to oxygen atoms coordination) in the chain parallel to the vanadium, the bridging oxygens coordinated to three vanadium atoms O3 making corner between the pyramids in the neighboring chains [7].

Periodic Hartree–Fock (HF) calculations for the bulk [18] have shown that V2O5 is essentially ionic, and the vanadyl oxygens have a covalent character. The atomic charges (Q) on the different oxygen centers decrease in the order: Q(O3)>Q(O2)>Q(O1). The covalent character of the vanadyl oxygen has been reported experimentally [8], [9]. Yin et al. [19] with a periodic density functional study of the bulk and the (0 0 1) surface have shown that the charge increases in the order: Q(O3)>Q(O2)>Q(O1) and they have suggested a large reactivity for the oxygen with the highest coordination. They have also reported a large reactivity for the O1 site from projected density of states.

Electronic spin resonance spectroscopy and the infrared spectroscopy studies have indicated that the vanadyl O1 [10] or the triply coordinated centers O3 [11], play the role of the reactive centers at the (0 0 1) surface. An adsorption model deduced from V2O5 (001) surface images [12], [13] have suggested the important role of the O2 site. The various experimental and theoretical results are controversial and do not give a clear picture of surface reactivity of vanadium pentoxide.

In this paper, we are interested by the relationship between the bulk and surface structure in the lamellar compounds, which present an easy cleavage plane. V2O5 is a prototype of lamellar structure and it is well known that it cleaves easily along the (0 0 1) plane due to the weak electrostatic forces between the (0 0 1) layers and it is generally accepted that the remaining bonds are not modified [17]. So the (0 0 1) surface remains identical to the parallel bulk plane. In order to validate this assumption we have performed quantum chemical calculations of the (0 0 1) surface with optimized bulk termination in the cluster approach. The validity of our original approach is discussed through the experimental and theoretical surface results.

Section snippets

Details and structures used in the calculations

We have used periodic and cluster boundary conditions to study the bulk and (0 0 1) V2O5 surface, respectively. The extended surface system is represented by a local cluster of finite size (cut out of the ideal solid) which is based on the assumption of dominantly local interatomic interactions at the surface [33], [34], [35]. The basis of this approach is to treat a surface cluster as fictitious molecule, with or without additional boundary conditions to take the effect of environmental coupling

Bulk structure

A full geometry optimization has been performed for lattice parameters and atomic coordinates. The optimized lattice parameters obtained with the optimized basis set are close to the experimental ones [16] (Table 1). The vanadiumvanadyl length bond VO1 (1.522 Å), differs by 0.05 Å from the experimental value. For example, the deviation from the experimental values is less than 0.01 Å for the VO(21)3, and 0.03 Å for the VO(23)2 length bond. Our HF lattice parameters appear better than those

Conclusion

In this work, periodic and cluster HF calculations of the V2O5 bulk and the (0 0 1) surface have been presented. At the bulk level, the fully optimized geometries are in a good agreement with experimental values. The ionic character of the system is confirmed by Mulliken charge populations, and bond populations results indicate additional covalent binding as expected.

To study the (0 0 1) surface, various clusters have been derived with the optimized bulk termination. This cluster model compared to

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by the CMEP (France).

References (41)

  • A. Bielanski et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1988)
  • R.A. Goschke et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • R.L. Smith et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • H. Poelman et al.

    J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.

    (1987)
  • X. Yin et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • M. Witko et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1997)
  • M. Witko et al.

    J. Mol. Catal.

    (1993)
  • A. Michalak et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1997)
  • J. Haber, in: J.M. Thomas, K. Zamaraiev (Eds.), Perspectives in Catalysis, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford,...
  • B. Grzybowska-Swierkosz, J. Haber (Eds.), Vanadia Catalysts for Processes of Oxidation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons, PWN,...
  • D.W. Murphy et al.

    Science

    (1979)
  • M. Armand, Ph.D. thesis, Grenoble,...
  • H.G. Bachmann et al.

    Z. Kristallogr. B

    (1961)
  • R.W.G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures, vol. 2, Wiley, New York, 1964, p....
  • P. Clauws et al.

    Phys. Status Solidi B

    (1985)
  • J. Farcy et al.

    J. Electrochim. Soc.

    (1990)
  • K. Tarama et al.

    Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.

    (1968)
  • R. Ramirez et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1990)
  • A. Da Costa et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1997)
  • C. Mathieu et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text