Design paper
The Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) Study: Study Design and Baseline Characteristics of the Cohort

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00054-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial is a three-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the effects of estrogen replacement therapy (0.625 mg/day oral conjugated estrogen) with or without continuous low-dose progestin (2.5 mg oral medroxyprogesterone acetate/day) versus placebo on progression of atherosclerosis. A total of 309 postmenopausal women at five sites underwent baseline coronary angiography and were randomized. Participants will have repeat coronary angiography after an average of 3.25 years of treatment. The primary outcome of interest will be change in minimum diameter of the major epicardial segments, as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. The primary aim is to test the hypothesis that either form of hormone therapy will slow the progression or induce regression of coronary atherosclerosis compared to placebo. The secondary aims are to assess the effects of the two treatments versus placebo on endothelial function (measured using flow-mediated vasodilator responses), on several presumed mediators of estrogen's effect on atherosclerosis (i.e., plasma lipids and lipoproteins, blood pressure, glucose metabolism, hemostatic factors, and antioxidant activity), on other factors that influence the development of coronary heart disease (i.e., diet, smoking status, exercise, weight, and health-related quality of life issues), and on clinical cardiovascular events.

The ERA trial is the first angiographic endpoint clinical trial to examine the effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement on coronary atherosclerosis in women. It will provide an unparalleled opportunity to determine if either regimen of hormone therapy is effective in slowing the progress of angiographically defined coronary atherosclerosis. This study will complement other estrogen replacement trials, such as the PEPI, HERS, and Women's Health Initiative studies, to provide a more comprehensive examination of the effects of estrogen replacement on cardiovascular risk factors, anatomic and functional manifestations of atherosclerosis, and risk for coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:257–285

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death and disability in women, accounting for 57% of all deaths, far more than breast or other cancers [1]. Because of the increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in women around menopause, it has been speculated that endogenous estrogen has an important cardioprotective effect. This speculation has been supported by observational and case-control studies demonstrating that estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women is associated with lower risk for CHD 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. In epidemiologic meta-analyses 8, 9, 10, long-term use of postmenopausal estrogen was associated with a 50% lower risk of CVD. The relationship observed between estrogen replacement and CHD risk is even more striking in older women with coronary artery disease 11, 12.

Despite the observational data suggesting estrogen's cardioprotective effect, its actual benefits and risks have not been fully evaluated. In 1998, the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) showed no benefit of 4.1 years of estrogen plus progestin therapy for secondary prevention of heart disease in postmenopausal women [13]. Within the overall null effect, there was a reduction in risk after 2 years of treatment unexpectedly offset by an increased risk during the first year. It remains unclear whether this pattern of changing risk over time was simply a chance occurrence combined with no real effect of the regimen, or due to an early adverse and late beneficial effect of the regimen.

A major question concerning the HERS trial results is whether the addition of the progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, Provera®) blocked estrogen's cardioprotective effects. Currently, clinicians administer a progestin with estrogen to prevent unopposed estrogen-induced endometrial carcinoma in women with intact uteri. However, MPA and 19-nor testosterone progestins blunt the favorable changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) associated with estrogen use 14, 15. Furthermore, in nonhuman primates, continuous low-dose MPA substantially reduced estrogen's favorable effect on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis [16]. On the other hand, the attenuation of estrogen-induced increases in HDL-C may be offset by the progestins' protection against estrogen-induced increases in triglycerides and factor VII 17, 18. Observational studies provide no evidence that combined therapy increases the risk of CHD compared with estrogen alone 19, 20, 21. Use of continuous low-dose progesterone may also improve long-term compliance with estrogen replacement therapy regimens by inducing amenorrhea after 6–12 months of therapy. Thus, the hope has been that the combination of estrogen plus continuous low-dose MPA would retain the cardioprotective effects of estrogen while protecting against endometrial hyperplasia.

More definitive information about the effects of estrogen with and without progestins on anatomic manifestations of atherosclerosis would help in interpreting the HERS results and their relationship to the large body of observational data on estrogen replacement and CHD risk. To clarify these issues, we designed an angiographic endpoint trial comparing unopposed estrogen, or estrogen plus continuous low-dose MPA, versus placebo in women with established coronary atherosclerosis.

Our trial, entitled “Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis” (ERA), will use quantitative coronary angiography and measures of endothelial function to determine the effects of estrogen replacement therapy on the anatomic and functional sequelae of atherosclerosis in coronary and peripheral arteries of postmenopausal women. The ERA trial will complement other estrogen replacement trials, including the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Intervention (PEPI) study [15], HERS, and the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) [22], to provide a more comprehensive examination of estrogen replacement's effects on cardiovascular risk factors, anatomic and functional manifestations of atherosclerosis, and CHD risk in postmenopausal women.

Section snippets

Overview

The ERA trial is a three-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the effects of estrogen replacement therapy with or without continuous low-dose progestin on angiographic progression or regression of coronary atherosclerosis (Table 1). From January 1996 through December 1997, a total of 309 postmenopausal women at five sites (Winston-Salem, Charlotte, and Greensboro, NC; Birmingham, AL; and Hartford, CT) underwent baseline coronary angiography documenting significant

Eligibility Criteria

The eligibility criteria were designed to include as many women as possible who might potentially benefit from estrogen replacement therapy, while excluding any for whom participation might be unnecessarily dangerous or who were unlikely to complete the study. Women under the age of 80 years were eligible if they had coronary artery disease according to a baseline angiogram and were postmenopausal. We defined as “postmenopausal” women aged 55 years or older without natural menses for at least 5

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1. Women also were excluded if they did not successfully complete the placebo run-in phase of the study, a 4-week period before randomization when potential participants were required to take daily placebos and keep a diary documenting medication consumption. (This diary was also used to record vaginal bleeding after randomization.) Subjects who returned to the clinic after 4 weeks and were > 80% compliant with the placebo medications based on pill count

Discussion

The ERA trial is the first angiographic endpoint trial to examine the effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement on progression or regression of coronary atherosclerosis in women. By randomizing women to unopposed estrogen, estrogen plus MPA, or placebo, it will provide an unparalleled opportunity to determine if either regimen is effective in slowing the progress of angiographically defined coronary atherosclerosis.

Quantitative measurement of coronary luminal narrowing using arteriograms

Acknowledgements

Supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (U01 HL45888). The authors thank the General Clinical Research Center (supported by NIH grant M01 RR07122) for their assistance in conducting this study, the ERA clinic staff for their expertise and efficiency, and the subjects and their families for their willing participation in this research.

References (63)

  • J.K. Williams et al.

    Effects of hormone replacement therapy on reactivity of atherosclerotic coronary arteries in cynomolgus monkeys

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1994)
  • V. Fuster

    Epidemic of cardiovascular disease and strokethe three main challenges

    Circulation

    (1999)
  • M.J. Stampfer et al.

    A prospective study of postmenopausal estrogen therapy and coronary heart disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1985)
  • D.B. Petitti et al.

    Noncontraceptive estrogens and mortalitylong-term follow-up of women in the Walnut Creek study

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1987)
  • T.L. Bush et al.

    Cardiovascular mortality and noncontraceptive use of estrogen in womenresults from the Lipid Research Clinics Program Follow-up Study

    Circulation

    (1987)
  • K. Hunt et al.

    Long-term surveillance of mortality and cancer incidence in women receiving hormone replacement therapy

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1987)
  • B.E. Henderson et al.

    Re-evaluating the role of progestogen therapy after the menopause

    Fertil Steril

    (1988)
  • M.H. Avila et al.

    Use of replacement estrogens and the risk of myocardial infarction

    Epidemiology

    (1990)
  • T.L. Bush

    The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1990)
  • M.J. Stampfer et al.

    Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study

    N Engl J Med

    (1991)
  • D. Grady et al.

    Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women

    Ann Intern Med

    (1992)
  • T.L. Bush et al.

    Cholesterol, lipoproteins, and coronary heart disease in women

    Clin Chem

    (1988)
  • J.M. Sullivan et al.

    Estrogen replacement and coronary artery disease. Effect on survival in postmenopausal women

    Arch Intern Med

    (1990)
  • S. Hulley et al.

    Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) trial

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • M.R. Adams et al.

    Medroxyprogesterone acetate antagonizes inhibitory effects of conjugated equine estrogens on coronary artery atherosclerosis

    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

    (1997)
  • E. Barrett-Connor et al.

    Postmenopausal estrogen use and heart disease risk factors in the 1980s. Rancho Bernardo, Calif, revisited

    JAMA

    (1989)
  • A.A. Nabulsi et al.

    Association of hormone-replacement therapy with various cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Investigators

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • B.M. Psaty et al.

    The risk of myocardial infarction associated with the combined use of estrogens and progestins in postmenopausal women

    Arch Intern Med

    (1994)
  • F. Grodstein et al.

    Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin use and the risk of cardiovascular disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • S. Sidney et al.

    Myocardial infarction and the use of estrogen and estrogen-progestogen in postmenopausal women

    Ann Intern Med

    (1997)
  • Cited by (71)

    • Outcomes of open treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease in women

      2021, Vascular Disease in Women: An Overview of the Literature and Treatment Recommendations
    • Dietary macronutrients, genetic variation, and progression of coronary atherosclerosis among women

      2014, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Participants underwent standardized quantitative coronary angiography at baseline and again after an mean±SD follow-up of 3.09 ± 0.79 years, with standardized quantitative assessment of change in minimal diameter of the major coronary epicardial segments28,29 (online Appendix). Based on up to 10 repeated measures in each participant, we had 2,054 coronary vessel observations in the final analysis, providing statistical power to detect very sensitive differences (0.054 mm) in change in mean minimal luminal diameter during follow-up.29 We used maximum likelihood random-effects regression models (Stata Release 10; StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) to test for the association between haplotypes and angiographic progression of atherosclerosis while adjusting for potential confounders and within-individual repeated measures (online Appendix).

    • Effect of hormone replacement therapy on plasma lipoprotein levels and coronary atherosclerosis progression in postmenopausal women according to type 2 diabetes mellitus status

      2010, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
      Citation Excerpt :

      The mean intraoperator difference between blinded duplicate measurements of minimal diameter was 0.02 mm. The reference, minimal (the point of greatest narrowing), and average luminal diameters were obtained for 10 proximal epicardial coronary artery segments, as previously described [9,16]. All analyses were based on intent-to-treat.

    • Hormone replacement therapy among postmenopausal women presenting with acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the GUSTO-III trial

      2010, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Estrogen is known to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein and decrease levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.53 While epidemiologic studies have corroborated these potential cardiovascular benefits,12,23,27,40,54-56 prospective data regarding HRT in CHD does not appear to support these findings. The “timing hypothesis” seeks to reconcile this contradiction.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text