Neutron Doppler broadening studies of tantalum and tungsten metal
Introduction
Neutron resonance Doppler broadening spectroscopy is in principle a valuable tool for making direct measurements of phonon spectrum parameters. It can be particularly useful when suitable single crystal samples are not available for making neutron coherent inelastic scattering measurements, from which detailed phonon spectra can be deduced, or when the thermal neutron absorption cross-section is too high to observe inelastic scattering. It also has the important advantage that it is element (or, more precisely, nuclide) specific. Most reports that have exploited the technique have followed the original method [1], in which the data have been fitted to the parameters of a specific phonon model (for example, an Einstein or generalized Nernst–Lindemann model). Some years ago, we published a method [2] for obtaining the principal moments of the phonon spectrum from resonance data and tested this theoretical approach with numerical experiments. These indicated that the first moment could be extracted with an accuracy better than 1%, the second moment to about 2% and the third moment to about 10%. These accuracies were not dependent on having a good prior knowledge of the nuclear resonance parameters.
The numerical trials of [2] did not include the experimental complications of background and resolution that are to be found in real data. These are particularly acute, even for low energy resonances, in transmission measurements that are done with high intensity spallation neutron sources requiring current-mode detector systems [3], [4] to cope with the high data collection rates. Although the moment method has been used successfully to obtain information on the plutonium phonon spectrum of a δ-phase Pu–Ga alloy [5], this was a special case in that the 1.04 eV resonance of the Pu cross-section was selected for analysis; the resonance parameters were already very precisely known [6], thus allowing the determination of the spectrum moments with good confidence. It remains the case that the moment method requires experimental testing and demonstration for general use. This is carried through in the present paper.
For this purpose we have selected two materials for which the phonon frequency spectra are already well-known from atomic force models deduced from phonon dispersion curves measured by coherent neutron inelastic scattering, and have suitable narrow, low energy resonances in their neutron cross-sections. These are tungsten and tantalum metals. These materials have body centered cubic lattices at normal pressure and temperatures ranging from zero to well above room temperature. Both have had their phonon dispersion curves along principal crystallographic axes measured by coherent inelastic scattering [7], [8], [9]. The dispersion curves in turn have been fitted to Born–Von Karman force models (up to 7th neighbor for tantalum [7], third neighbor for tungsten [9]), from which the phonon frequency spectrum has been calculated. The measurements were made at room temperature. A secondary aim is to establish some of the ranges of physical and experimental conditions (neutron resonance energies and widths, neutron resolution parameters etc.) within which reliable results can be expected.
Section snippets
General theory
The detailed nature of the Doppler broadening of neutron resonances depends on the environment in which the nucleus is embedded, i.e. the solid, liquid or gaseous state and its temperature and pressure. Information on the nuclear environment can therefore be extracted by careful measurement of the form of the neutron cross-section in the resonance region.
The basic papers are those by Bethe [10], [11], on Doppler broadening in a gaseous medium, and Lamb [12] on the basic formalism for crystals.
Experimental procedures
Neutron energies are measured by the time-of-flight method on a 58 m flight path (flight path 5) from the MLNSC target of the 800 MeV proton linear accelerator at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE). Full details of the main characteristics of our time-of-flight transmission spectrometer can be found in [5]. The main difference in the system used in the work described here lies in the detector. The active material of the detector (which was designed and loaned by Professor H.
The resolution function and background
Our analysis of the data consists essentially of least-squares fitting to Eq. (14) of the neutron rate measured by the detector, the variables in the fitting being some or all of the nuclear resonance parameters and the more important phonon moments. The characteristics of the resolution function Z(E,E′) are very important in this fitting process, and must be considered carefully. Basic parameters governing the resolution function are the proton pulse-width, the timing channel width, the angle
Discussion
For both tantalum and tungsten the phonon moments measured by neutron resonance Doppler spectroscopy are within a few percent of the corresponding quantities deduced from Born–Von Karman atomic force models fitted to phonon dispersion data. Our measured mean phonon spectrum energy for Tantalum (14.3±0.1 meV at 17 K) is slightly lower than that calculated (14.6 meV at 296 K) from the spectrum of [3], while for tungsten the measured value (20.2±0.2 meV at 15 K) is slightly higher than the
Conclusions
We have measured some important phonon spectrum moments for the bcc metals tantalum and tungsten by means of neutron resonance Doppler spectroscopy. We initially established resonance parameters from the data taken at 300 and 310 K for several of the important resonances up to 85 eV in Ta and 48 eV in W. These are in reasonable agreement with the parameters previously reported in the literature (see Ref. [17]), but our values are generally considerably more precise. Our primary measured
Acknowledgements
We thank Bard Bennett, Gene Farnum and Steve Sterbenz for helpful discussion and their continued support and interest in this work. The experiments were carried out at the Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center at Los Alamos (MLNSC), which is funded jointly by Defense Programs and Energy Research (Office of Basic Energy Sciences) of the US Department of Energy (DOE). This work was done at Los Alamos under the auspices of the DOE (under contract W-7405-ENG-36) and funded through its Science
References (22)
- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B
(1996) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(1990) Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(2000)- et al.
Solid State Comm.
(1964) - et al.
Physica
(1947) - et al.
Nucl. Inst. and Meth.
(1983) - et al.
Phys. Rev.
(1962) - et al.
Phys. Rev. B
(1998) - et al.
Phys. Rev.
(1964)
Can. J. Phys.
Cited by (21)
On the Methodology to Calculate the Covariance of Estimated Resonance Parameters
2015, Nuclear Data SheetsNeutron resonance transmission spectroscopy with high spatial and energy resolution at the J-PARC pulsed neutron source
2014, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated EquipmentCitation Excerpt :In this paper we limit the theoretical estimation of the sample transmission to a simple convolution with a neutron double pulse of a given width (changing with the energy of neutron) and compare the measured spectra with the experimental data for samples of various materials placed directly on the detector input face (~15 mm from the active area). A more sophisticated fitting of the transmission spectra [19,20,38,39] can be implemented to increase the accuracy of the reconstructed elemental thicknesses within the sample. Calibration of transmission spectra with samples of known thickness can also be used for data interpretation.
Experimental evidence sustaining a compact-extended model for doppler broadening of neutron absorption resonances
2011, Annals of Nuclear EnergyCitation Excerpt :We find this model being used in different sort of applications such as Neutron Resonance Absorption Spectrometry (Kiyanagi et al., 2005), Remote Sensed Thermometry (Mayers et al., 1989; Stone et al., 2005) and above all in Reactor Physics (Dresner, 1960) (where it is used without the effective temperature refinement but as a free gas model). More refined models based upon the previous cited work of Nelkin and Parks are also found (Lynn et al., 2002). There are indeed examples (particularly for thin resonances in tightly bound systems like uranium oxides) for which departures from the ETGM are observed (Borgonovi et al., 1970).
Indicator to estimate temperature sensitivity of resonance in temperature measurement by neutron resonance spectroscopy
2011, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :The phenomenon of Doppler broadening of neutron resonance plays an important role in pursuing sample properties. On the one hand, neutron resonance method has been used to determine the resonance parameters simultaneously with phonon moments of the sample [1–5]. On the other hand, this method has successful applications in experiments aiming to measure temperature.
Synthetic model for Doppler broadening of neutron absorption resonances in molecular fluids
2010, Annals of Nuclear Energy