Mismatch negativity to speech stimuli in 8-month-old infants and adults
References (24)
- et al.
Event-related brain potential of human newborns to pitch change of an acoustic stimulus
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1990) - et al.
Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in new borns
Hear. Res.
(1995) - et al.
Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1993) - et al.
Differential auditory processing continues during sleep
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1991) - et al.
Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1989) - et al.
Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1985) Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English
Adv. Infancy Res.
(1995)- et al.
Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4–8-year-old children
Psychophysiology
(1997) - et al.
The ontogenetically earliest discriminative response of the human brain
Psychophysiology
(1996) - et al.
Speech perception in infants
Science
(1971)
Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographical ERP study
Psychophysiology
Developing phonological categories from the speech signal
Cited by (47)
Challenges and new perspectives of developmental cognitive EEG studies
2022, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :Deviant stimuli have a lower probability compared to standard ones, which generally occur with a probability comprised between 0.75 and 0.90 (Sambeth et al., 2006; Cheour et al., 2002b; Kushnerenko et al., 2002; Leppänen, Eklund and Heikki, 1997; Winkler et al., 2003). The oddball paradigm has been consistently used with deviants in sound duration (Ceponiene et al., 2002; Clarkson et al., 1989), frequency (Alho et al., 1990a,b; Kushnerenko et al., 2002; Leppänen et al., 2010; Bisiacchi et al., 2009; Mento et al., 2010), intensity (Kushnerenko et al., 2002; Partanen et al., 2013), phonetic features of speech sounds (Dehaene-Lambertz, 2000; Cheour et al., 1998a,b; Pang et al., 1998; François et al., 2021), complex musical or speech sequences (Háden et al., 2015a, b; François et al., 2017; Mueller et al., 2012). Importantly, the term “Mismatch Response” or MMR is often preferred in developmental studies because of its high intersubject variability.
Adult-like processing of naturalistic sounds in auditory cortex by 3- and 9-month old infants
2017, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :We did not observe any differences in auditory processing between 3- and 9-month old listeners. This could be interpreted as inconsistent with the idea these ages occur before and during a time of significant developmental change in terms of anatomy (Moore, 2002; Moore and Linthicum, 2007), behaviour (Kuhl et al., 1992; Kuhl, 2010; Maurer and Werker, 2014), and electrophysiology (Pang et al., 1998; Trainor et al., 2003; He et al., 2007b). On the other hand, by six months of age infants already possess some sophisticated speech perception, such as the ability to recognize a limited repertoire of words (Bergelson and Swingley, 2012, 2013; Vouloumanos et al., 2014).
Time course of ERP generators to syllables in infants: A source localization study using age-appropriate brain templates
2012, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :The main ERP responses elicited by CV syllables in 6-month-olds included a fronto-central positive deflection followed by a negative deflection. These responses were analogous to those previously reported in infant ERP studies on speech perception (Cheour et al., 1997, 1998, 2001; Dehaene-Lambertz and Baillet, 1998; Dehanene-Lambertz and Dehaene, 1994; Friederici et al., 2002; Friedrich et al., 2004; Leppänen et al., 2002; Pang et al., 1998; Rivera-Gaxiola et al., 2005, 2007; Shafer et al., 1998; Weber et al., 2004). In addition, during the fronto-central positive deflection, a frontal sink was identified that was visible at frontopolar locations as a negative deflection.