Elsevier

Water Research

Volume 35, Issue 12, August 2001, Pages 2895-2904
Water Research

Optimisation of combined coagulation and microfiltration for water treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00586-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of upstream coagulant dosing for full-flow microfiltration of an upland-reservoir water has been investigated. The process, run under conditions of constant flux and pH and based on a ferric salt, is compared with a published study of another full-flow process based on alum dosing and operated at constant pressure and coagulant concentration. The current study includes data for the residual deposit remaining following backflushing by reverse flow. Results are presented in terms of the specific-cake resistance (R′c,m−2) as a function of pH or coagulant dose. Reasonable correlation with classical cake filtration theory was obtained, such that Rc was assumed to be independent of run time and cake thickness. The following trends have been noted:

  • The optimum pH for the alum-based system appears to be between 7.5 and 8 on the basis of cake resistance.

  • The effect of coagulant dose between 18 and 71 μM Fe3+ is much more significant than a change in pH between 5 and 9 for the alum system: a 53-fold increase in specific flux compared with a 7-fold increase with reference to the limiting Rc values at pH 4.8 and 7.7.

  • A low coagulant dose (0.018 mM, 1.0 mg l−1 Fe3+) appears to have a slightly detrimental effect on downstream microfiltration operation. The low coagulant doses apparently cause incomplete aggregation of colloidal particles such that internal fouling of the membrane takes place.

  • The residual (cleaning cycle) deposit resistance followed roughly the same trend as the backflush cycle-cake resistance with coagulant concentration, but with a much reduced value (about 16 times lower, on average).

  • An optimum coagulant dose of 0.055 mM (3.1 mg/l) Fe3+ can be identified on the basis of operational cost based on coagulant cost and cake resistance, all other aspects of the system being substantially unchanged. It is concluded that coagulation with downstream microfiltration offers a cost-effective means of removing natural organic matter, achieving a THMFP removal of around 80% at the optimum dose.

Introduction

The combination of membrane microfiltration (MF) with upstream coagulant dosing is known to yield significant flux enhancement over microfiltration alone for the treatment of surface waters laden with natural organic matter (NOM) (Ben Aı̈m et al., 1988; Lahoussine-Turcard et al., 1992; Magara et al., 1998; Wiesner et al., 1989). This process is important in suppressing trihalomethane (THM) formation from surface waters. The use of membrane separation as opposed to conventional clarification techniques permits a much reduced flocculation time—in the order of 15–60 s—and thus a more compact plant. This arises from the sub-micron pore size of the filtration membranes, thereby requiring flocs to grow only to around 2 μm in size.

Whilst recent work published in this area is quite extensive, data on real systems is relatively scarce and the effect of coagulant dosing on backflush cycle efficiency in particular has received little attention. Moreover, little has been published on the comparative efficacy of the candidate ferric and aluminium-based inorganic coagulants, and no cost-benefit analysis has been published pertaining to the coagulation–microfiltration system.

Results are presented both for ex situ coagulation trials based on particle size measurement and coagulation-full flow MF pilot-scale trials based on an upland water from the Huntington reservoir in the North West of England (Table 1). Removal of NOM, represented by the total organic carbon (TOC) data, from this water is critical for meeting water quality regulations pertaining to THMs, these being disinfection byproducts generated as a result of chlorination of residual organic matter.

Section snippets

Ex-situ coagulation testing

The short-term change in particle size during the coagulation process was investigated using conventional jar-test equipment in conjunction with a Hiac-Royco LV Versacount particle monitor, using only the 2–5 μm channel. The particle monitor was set to sample approximately every 2.4 s with the sample line inserted in the jar containing 1 l of sample. The paddle speed was set to 230 rpm and the background raw water particle count established over an initial 30-s period. The appropriate amount of 0.5 m

Results

Results for floc growth are shown in Fig. 3, Fig. 4. The “% Conversion of Particles” data shown in Fig. 4 represents an arbitrary measure of the proportion of particles registered in the 2–5 μm size fraction, this size fraction being significantly above the maximum membrane pore size of 0.2 μm, after 20 s of growth. In this figure “100%” represents the maximum number of particles recorded in this size fraction, about 7500 particles/ml, according to Fig. 3. The 20 s time period relates to the

Operational (backflush cycle) and residual (cleaning cycle) cake

The data shown in Fig. 6 indicate that there exists, for the microfiltration system investigated, a threshold coagulant concentration value below which there is deleterious effect on plant operation, as evidenced by the pressure gradient (Fig. 5). This implies that floc growth needs to proceed to a certain critical floc size prior to challenging the microfiltration membrane, which otherwise is apparently partially irreversibly clogged by the flocculant solids. The coagulant concentration

Conclusions

Pre-coagulant dosing upstream of microfiltration can improve the perfomance of the latter, with specific reference to the lowering of hydraulic resistance, provided floc growth has proceeded beyond a critical stage. It appears that low coagulant doses cause incomplete aggregation of colloidal particles and precipitated humic materials such that internal fouling of the membrane takes place. As with conventional clarification, optimal coagulant dosing upstream of microfiltration pertains to the

References (6)

  • Y. Magara et al.

    Advanced membrane technology for application to water treatment

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1998)
  • Ben Aim R., Peuchot M. M., Vigneswarean S., Yamaoto K. and Boonthanon S. (1988) A new process for water reuse: In-line...
  • Davis R. H. and Grant D. C. (1992) Theory for dead end microfiltration. In Membrane Handbook, eds W. S. Ho and K. K....
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text