The acute pressure natriuresis response blunted and the blood pressure response reset in the normal pregnant rat,☆☆,,★★

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70384-9Get rights and content

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that the acute pressure natriuresis curve was reset in pregnancy to facilitate the volume expansion.

STUDY DESIGN: Studies were done with 14- to 16-day pregnant (n = 8) and age-matched virgin female (n = 6) Sprague-Dawley rats that were under general anesthesia. The left kidney was denervated, and mechanical clamps were placed on the aorta above and below the renal arteries for manipulation of renal perfusion pressure. Rats received intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride (1.5% body weight/h) and a cocktail of vasoactive factors to suppress variation in endogenous hormones. Renal perfusion pressure was varied acutely from 125 to 95 mm Hg, and glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, sodium excretion, and urine flow were measured in both kidneys at each renal perfusion pressure. Data were analyzed by unpaired t test and by homogeneity by slopes.

RESULTS: The acute pressure natriuresis curve was blunted in pregnant rats versus virgins, and the renal nerves were not responsible. The blunted natriuretic response in pregnancy was due to loss of tubular epithelial responsiveness to increased blood pressure.

CONCLUSION: The pressure natriuretic response is markedly blunted in pregnancy, permitting the cumulative plasma volume expansion to occur. Contrary to nongravid states, blunting of the acute pressure natriuresis curve in pregnancy is not associated with increased blood pressure because of the profound peripheral vasodilation. This suggests an alteration in the mechanism(s) normally linking blood pressure control to the acute pressure natriuresis relationship. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:486-91.)

Section snippets

Methods

Experiments were conducted on 14 female Sprague-Dawley rats (3 to 5 months old) from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc, Indianapolis. Rats were maintained on standard rat food (~24% protein, ~1% sodium chloride) and free access to drinking water. Day 1 of pregnancy was determined by the presence of sperm in vaginal smears. Pressure-natriuresis experiments were conducted at 14 to 16 days of pregnancy (n = 8) and in age-matched virgins (n = 6).

We used an adaptation of the experimental model developed by

Results

Pregnant rats were heavier (284 ± 7 g) than virgins (250 ± 2 g; P < .005). Plasma volume expansion was indicated by a decline in hematocrit at days 14 to 16 of pregnancy (44 ± 1 vs 47 ± 1 vol%; P < .01 vs virgins). The usual gestational rise in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow was not seen, probably because of the infusion of vasoactive hormones (Table I).

The relationship between urinary sodium excretion and renal perfusion pressure in innervated and denervated kidneys of

Comment

In this study we have described the acute pressure-natriuresis relationship in the pregnant rat. We had hypothesized that the cumulative sodium retention and plasma volume expansion of pregnancy could not coexist with a normally operating acute pressure natriuresis. Our study confirms this hypothesis because we found a marked decrease in the gain of the relationship between urinary sodium excretion and renal perfusion pressure in the pregnant rat. This suggests a diminished natriuretic response

References (25)

  • AC Guyton

    The surprising kidney-fluid mechanism for pressure control: its infinite gain!

    Hypertension

    (1990)
  • RJ Roman et al.

    Characterization of a new model for the study of pressure-natriuresis in the rat

    Am J Physiol

    (1985)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Normal and Abnormal Volume Homeostasis

      2009, Chesley's Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy
    • Mechanisms of altered renal sodium handling in age-related hypertension

      2018, American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    From the Departments of Physiology and Statistics and Computer Science, West Virginia University.

    ☆☆

    Funded by National Institutes of Health grant No. HL 31933.

    Reprints not available from the authors.

    ★★

    0002-9378/98 $5.00 + 0 6/1/89332

    View full text