Bimanual coordination and interhemispheric interaction
Introduction
Bimanual coordination of skilled finger movements is an outstanding capability of the human motor system. Not only the activation of particular regions such as the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the lateral premotor cortex (Sadato, Yonekura, Waki, Yamada, & Ishii, 1997; Toyokura, Muro, Komiya, & Obara, 1999), but also the functional coupling between the premotor and sensorimotor areas of the two hemispheres is important for the precise timing and execution of bimanual movements. Lesion studies strongly suggest that interhemispheric exchange of premotor and sensorimotor commands plays a major role in bimanual activities (Geffen, Jones, & Geffen, 1994; Jeeves, Silver, & Jacobson, 1988; Leonard, Milner, & Jones, 1988; Preilowski, 1972; Sperry, 1968). Which role do interhemispheric interactions in the sensorimotor system play in the implementation of bimanuality? How do interhemispheric interactions change during bimanual skill acquisition? Another question relates to the point that, in real life, unimanual and bimanual activities alternate frequently. How does the brain switch from the unimanual to the bimanual mode of operation? Some recent papers have shed light on these questions.
The present review focuses on interhemispheric interactions in the course of bimanual skill acquisition. This is of particular importance, since dynamic changes of interhemispheric communication (in the following referred to as `interhemispheric coupling') are expected to provide us with information as to how the brain acquires and implements bimanuality (Section 2).
In Section 3, the functional relevance of interhemispheric communication is discussed in the light of lesion studies describing the effects of callosal damage on interhemispheric coupling and bimanual coordination.
Finally, recent evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) research in favor of an extended network of cortical areas involved in bimanual motor activities is reviewed with emphasis on the regional activation rather than interregional interaction (Section 4).
Interregional functional coupling can be assessed non-invasively with task-related coherence (TRCoh) analysis of oscillatory activities in different brain regions. Changes in interregionally correlated oscillations in animals can reflect behavioral measures (Bressler, 1995, Bressler, 1996; deCharms & Merzenich, 1996; Engel, Konig, & Singer, 1991; Laurent, Wehr, & Davidowitz, 1996; Murthy & Fetz, 1992; Roelfsema, Engel, Konig, & Singer, 1997; Sanes & Donoghue, 1993; Singer, 1993, Singer, 1994, Singer, 1999). This technique has also proven to be useful when applied to surface EEG data (Andrew & Pfurtscheller, 1996; Classen, Gerloff, Honda, & Hallett, 1998; Gerloff, Hadley, et al., 1998; Manganotti et al., 1998; Rappelsberger & Petsche, 1988; Rappelsberger, Pfurtscheller, & Filz, 1994), and is thus available as an instrument for non-invasive studies in humans. Classen et al. (1998) demonstrated significant TRCoh between the visual and motor cortex in a visuomotor tracking task; Gerloff, Hadley, et al. (1998) identified different amounts of network-like activation of human cortical motor areas during internal and external pacing of movement. In both studies, coherence changes in the beta band (13–30 Hz) were most sensitive to changes of the motor aspects of the task. This is further substantiated by the demonstration of functional coupling of primary motor cortex (M1) and muscle (EEG–EMG (electromyography, EMG) or MEG–EMG (magnetoencephalography, MEG) coherence) which also has its maximal amplitude in the beta frequency range (Conway et al., 1995; Halliday, Conway, Farmer, & Rosenberg, 1998; Kilner, Baker, Salenius, Hari, & Lemon, 2000; Kilner et al., 1999; Mima & Matsuoka, 2000). Preliminary data on the functional coupling of visual and somatosensory areas in a task, in which visual and tactile information had to be matched, suggest that high coherence is related to high behavioral efficacy (Hummel & Gerloff, in press). In this predominantly sensory task, the effects were prominent in the alpha frequency range. This is consistent with the view that dynamic modulation of alpha frequencies is more sensitive to variation of somatosensory parameters, while changes in the beta band are more representative of aspects of actual motor control (Salmelin & Hari, 1994). Changes in the gamma band may be particularly involved in sensory awareness (Engel & Singer, 2001).
Section snippets
Learning-related changes of interhemispheric coupling
The main hypothesis tested in the series of experiments reported here was that specific changes of interhemispheric functional coupling might be a basis of bimanual skill acquisition. To address this question, TRCoh and task-related power (TRPow) were estimated during the fusion of two overlearned unimanual finger tapping sequences into one novel bimanual sequence, and the results before and after a 30 min training period were compared (Andres et al., 1999).
Pathologic interhemispheric interaction and effects on movement coordination
We propose that the learning-related increase and decrease of interhemispheric TRCoh at different stages of bimanual skill acquisition reflects modulation of interhemispheric communication in the motor system. The interpretation of TRCoh as an indicator of interhemispheric communication is supported by development-related changes (Knyazeva et al., 1997; Knyazeva, Kurganskaya, Kurgansky, Njiokiktjien, & Vildavsky, 1994; Koyama et al., 1997), lesion data after callosal and hemispheric damage (
Cortical regions involved in bimanual sequence learning
According to the functional connectivity (TRCoh) and regional activation (TRPow) data, the cortical network involved in bimanual sequence learning probably comprises the bilateral SM1, SMA, CMA, PMd and PPC. These areas are consistent with areas involved in complex unimanual and bimanual motor tasks.
Acknowledgements
C. Gerloff and F.G. Andres were supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 307/B12, SFB 550/C5, and NIH intramural.
References (117)
- et al.
An extended difference of coherence test for comparing and combining several independent coherence estimates: theory and application to the study of motor units and physiological tremor
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
(1997) - et al.
Event-related coherence as a tool for studying dynamic interaction of brain regions
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
(1996) - et al.
`Direct' and `crossed' modulation of human motor cortex excitability following exercise
Neuroscience Letters
(1996) Large-scale cortical networks and cognition
Brain Research Brain Research Reviews
(1995)Interareal synchronization in the visual cortex
Behavioural Brain Research
(1996)- et al.
Alien hand syndrome: influence of neglect on the clinical presentation of frontal and callosal variants
Cortex
(1997) - et al.
Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition, or how to keep a good hemisphere down
Brain Cognition
(1996) - et al.
Brain areas involved in interlimb coordination: a distributed network
Neuroimage
(2001) - et al.
Alpha band power changes in unimanual and bimanual sequential movements, and during motor transitions
Clinical Neurophysiology
(2001) - et al.
Lateralized division of attention in the commissurotomized and intact brain
Neuropsychologia
(1980)