Elsevier

Social Networks

Volume 10, Issue 3, September 1988, Pages 233-253
Social Networks

Sorting out centrality: An analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(88)90014-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Although the concept of centrality has been well developed in the social networks literature, its empirical development has lagged somewhat. This paper moves a step in that direction by assessing the performance of four centrality models under a variety of known and controlled situations. It begins by examining the assumptions underlying each model, as well as its behavior in a community influence network. It then assesses the robustness and sensitivity of each model under conditions of random and systematic variation introduced into this network.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (94)

  • Assessing the performance of the bootstrap in simulated assemblage networks

    2021, Social Networks
    Citation Excerpt :

    Analysts have long been interested in aspects of variability in network actor centrality measures; here we briefly note some of that work. Bolland (1988) conducted an early study of centrality in simulated networks produced by randomly changing elements of the 0/1 adjacency matrix of an empirical network. Among other analyses, he compared mean correlations between centrality scores in the simulated and original empirical networks under different levels of randomness (up to 20 % of network elements being changed) for different centrality measures.

  • Comparison of path-based centrality measures in protein-protein interaction networks revealed proteins with phenotypic relevance during adaptation to changing nitrogen environments

    2021, Journal of Proteomics
    Citation Excerpt :

    These separated hubs can occur as a result of biological relevance (e.g. multiple self-sufficient protein-protein interaction complexes) or missing data. In addition, because BC is sensitive towards local topology, BC is more affected by missing data or random errors in edge-distribution than degree-based centrality measures [48]. On the other hand, because of its sensitivity, BC is most suited to observe true changes in network connectivity and node importance.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This is a revision of a paper originally presented at the 1986 meeting of the Sunbelt Social Network Conference. It benefitted from comments by Phil Bonacich, Wayne Baker, Kathleen Bolland, and anonymous reviewers.

∗∗

Institute for Social Science Research, University of Alabama, P.O. Box 587, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, U.S.A.

View full text