Net energy for gain (NEgain) of cassava tops

https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(88)90034-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The digestibility, and effect on voluntary feed intake, of various forms of cassava tops were determined. For 70 days, 15 entire lambs subdivided into 3 treatment groups, were then fed a basal maintenance ration of Chloris gayana hay with or without 200 g dry matter (DM) of cassavatops hay (CTH) or cassava-tops silage (CTS). The amount of Chloris gayana hay in the treatment groups was adjusted weekly for each animal, in accordance with its weight, in order just to meet maintenance requirements. A mineral supplement was provided and water was available at all times. At the end of the trial, the animals were slaughtered and the gross energy of the carcasses, offal and blood was determined from their contents of protein and fat. The difference between the gross energy of the control animals and those on treatment gave the net energy (NE) of the cassava tops. The results of the first experiments showed that, on average, cassava tops contained 27.1% crude protein (CP), 24.6% crude fibre (CF), 5.9% ether extract (EE) and 782.5 p.p.m. HCN in the DM; hay making seemed the most efficient method of reducing HCN content. Overall, the digestibility coefficients (%) of cassava tops were: organic matter (OM), 67.2; CF, 43.5; CP, 79.5; and EE, 51.7. Feeding cassava tops together with Chloris gayana hay, which was offered to sheep as the basal diet, improved voluntary feed intake by the animals.

In the NE study CTS was significantly (P <0.05) more digestible, and resulted in intake of more metabolisable energy (ME), than CTH. In spite of this superiority, the energy in the CTH was better utilised for gain. The NE values of CTH and CTS were 2.22 and 1.67 MJ kg−1 DM, respectively. This apparent contradiction was explained in terms of thyroid malfunction as shown by the greatly enlarged thyroid glands of the animals feeding on CTS containing high HCN content. It is concluded that, for animal production purposes, CTH should be preferred over CTS.

References (46)

  • E.W. Crampton et al.

    Applied Animal Nutrition

    (1969)
  • C. Demarquilly et al.

    The comparative nutritive value of legumes and grasses

    Department of Plant Husbandry, The Agricultural College of Sweden, Publication

    (1973)
  • D. Floukes et al.

    Digestibility of cassava forage

  • W.N. Garrett

    The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain

  • W.N. Garrett et al.

    The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain

    J. Anim. Sci.

    (1959)
  • J. Glover et al.

    The total digestible nutrients and gross digestible energy of ruminant feeds

    J. Agric. Sci., Camb.

    (1960)
  • R. Jarrige et al.

    The voluntary intake of forages

    Department of Plant Husbandry, The Agricultural College of Sweden, Publication No. 28

    (1973)
  • R.M. Johnson et al.

    The chemical composition of some tropical food plants. IV

    Manioc. Trop. Sci.

    (1965)
  • W.O. Jones

    Manioc in Africa

    (1959)
  • C.N. Karue

    Nutritive value of herbage in semi-arid lands of East Africa. I. Chemical composition

    East Afr. Agric. For. J.

    (1974)
  • A.L. Lehninger

    Principles of Biochemistry

  • G.P. Lofgreen

    A comparative slaughter technique for determining net energy values with beef cattle

  • G.P. Lofgreen et al.

    The net energy of blackstrap molasses for fattening steers as determined by a comparative slaughter technique

    J. Anim. Sci.

    (1960)
  • Cited by (2)

    • Cassava leaves as animal feed: Potential and limitations

      1993, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

    Present address: IDRC, P.O. Box 62084, Nairobi, Kenya.

    ∗∗

    Present address: DAFCO, P.O. Box 1823, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

    View full text