Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90128-8Get rights and content

Abstract

A surface occluding a more distant surface gives rise to interocularly unpaired regions to its immediate left and right. The unpaired region on the left side is visible only to the left eye, whereas that on the right side is visible only to the right eye. Thus for real world scenes there are opto-geometrical constraints which determine whether particular combinations of relative depth and right-eye-only or left-eye-only stimuli are ecologically valid or invalid. We report a demonstration and experiments to show that opto-geometrically “valid” unpaired regions are seen as continuous with the rear plane and escape interocular suppression, whereas “invalid” unpaired regions are perceived as closer and are suppressed vigorously. An additional experiment indicates that the results cannot be understood in terms of correspondence solving, but require neural mechanisms that embody real-world occlusion constraints. These results suggest a rather close interaction between stereopsis and rivalry “modules”. Since explicit eye-of-origin information is lost relatively early in the hierarchical organization of cortical visual processing, we argue that occlusion-related constraints must be embodied at such early levels.

References (23)

  • KayeM.

    Stereopsis without binocular correlation

    Vision Research

    (1978)
  • ShimojoS. et al.

    Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion

    Vision Research

    (1989)
  • BurkhalterA. et al.

    Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and C2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1986)
  • ColleT.S.

    Extrapolating and interpolating surfaces in depth

  • FrisbyJ.P. et al.

    The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms

    Perception

    (1978)
  • HelmholtzH.V.

    Treatise on physiological optics

    (1924)
  • HollidayI.E. et al.

    Depth perception of uncorrelated areas in random-dot stereograms

    Perception

    (1985)
  • HubelD.H. et al.

    Segregation of form, color and stereopsis in primate area 18

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1987)
  • JuleszB.

    Binocular depth perception of computergenerated patterns

    Bell System Technical Journal

    (1960)
  • JuleszB.

    Foundation of cyclopean perception

    (1971)
  • JuleszB. et al.

    Interaction between pools of binocular disparity detectors tuned to different disparities

    Biological Cybernetics

    (1976)
  • Cited by (131)

    • Perceptual mechanisms underlying amodal surface integration of 3-D stereoscopic stimuli

      2018, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, if one applies the same contrast polarity rule to the scenarios in Fig. 1b and c, it is predictable that the visual system has a larger bias to amodally integrate the three rectangular segments with the same contrast-polarity in Fig. 1b, than the ones in Fig. 1c where the middle rectangle (lighter than the background) and the two flanking rectangular segments (darker than the background) have opposite contrast polarity (Su et al., 2010a, 2010b). An objective way to study amodal surface completion is by measuring its effect on a specific perceptual task (e.g., Gerbino & Fantoni, 2006; Kellman et al., 2005a; Marr, 1982; Ringach & Shapley, 1996; Rubin, 2001; Sekuler et al., 1994; Shimojo & Nakayama, 1990a, 1990b; Su et al., 2010a, 2010b; van Bogaert, Ooi, & He, 2008; Yin et al., 2000). For example, when spatially separated images are amodally integrated into a single surface entity, all separated components of the surface will exhibit similar surface properties (e.g., Su et al., 2010a).

    • The Perceptual Science of Augmented Reality

      2023, Annual Review of Vision Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Current address: Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153, Japan.

    View full text