A mechanism for suppression of optokinesis
Reference (23)
Optokinetic eye movements in the rabbit: input-output relations
Vision Res.
(1969)- et al.
Optokinetic reactions in man elicited by localized retinal motion stimuli
Vision Res.
(1979) - et al.
Target position and velocity: the stimuli for smooth pursuit eye movements
Vision Res.
(1980) - et al.
Pursuit eye movements in response to stimulus velocity may be OKN
Invest. Ophthal. visual Sci., ARVO Abstr. Suppl.
(1980) - et al.
Slow eye movements to eccentric targets
Invest. Ophthal. visual Sci.
(1981) - et al.
Human optokinetic responses under quasi-open and closed loop conditions
Biol. Cybernet.
(1981) Untersuchungen uber optokinetischen Nystagmus
Archs Neerb. Physiol.
(1936)Movements of the Eyes
(1977)- et al.
Optokinetic nystagmus during selective retinal stimulation
Expl Brain Res.
(1975) - et al.
Quantitative analysis of the velocity characteristics of optokinetic nystagmus and optokinetic after-nystagmus
J. Physiol.
(1977)
Uber induzierte Bewegung (Ein Bietrag zur Theorie optisch whargenommener Bewegung)
Psychol. Forsch.
A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology
Cited by (26)
How visual background motion and task difficulty modulate players' performance in a shooting task
2015, DisplaysCitation Excerpt :Therefore, moving backgrounds decrease performance in tasks that are rather simple, namely tasks that involve transient presentations of stationary items and do not mobilize many attentional resources. However, moving visual backgrounds do not always have a negative impact on performance, most likely because human observers are able to voluntarily suppress the OKN by fixating any visual item that is superimposed on the moving background e.g., [19,29–31]. Menozzi and Koga [32] compared how people read a text displayed on a laterally moving, patterned background to a fixed version of the same background.
Instruction dependent activation during optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) stimulation: An FMRI study at 3 T
2010, Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :In the present study, a 30 × 11° stimulus field was used and the possibility exists that with a small field, stare instructions may have caused OKN suppression to occur. OKN suppression is reflected by a loss of slow phase eye movement in the direction of stimulus motion together with a decrease in the number of oppositely-directed quick phases (Wyatt and Pola, 1984, 1988; Pola et al., 1992). However, previous OKN suppression studies (Dieterich et al., 1998, 2000) had to add a fixation point in the stimulus field in order to suppress OKN.
Contextual effects on motion perception and smooth pursuit eye movements
2008, Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Such context-induced retinal image motion drives a passive pursuit or slow-phase optokinetic response into the opposite direction. In order to smoothly track the target, the OKN has to be suppressed (Lindner and Ilg, 2006; Worfolk and Barnes, 1992; Wyatt and Pola, 1984), possibly causing the delay in initiating pursuit. For moving backgrounds, most studies provide evidence for a spatial averaging of motion signals (motion assimilation).