Elsevier

Vision Research

Volume 24, Issue 12, 1984, Pages 1931-1945
Vision Research

A mechanism for suppression of optokinesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(84)90027-0Get rights and content

Abstract

We have studied optokinetic responses to oscillating patterns of dots, and the suppression of these responses by a foveally stabilized target. Such a target suppressed most of the optokinetic response, although the target provided neither retinal target motion nor target offset from the fovea. This indicates that suppression of OKN can occur by other means than smooth pursuit eye movements to traditional stimuli. We studied the form of the suppression for different optokinetic stimulus strengths and stimulus frequencies (0.25–1.0 Hz). The results show that over this frequency range the optokinetic response is substantial, and also that the suppression continues to operate. We also examined the time-course of suppression: it begins to appear within 150–200 msec of the appearance of a fixation target in motion relative to the optokinetic stimulus field.

Reference (23)

  • DunckerK.

    Uber induzierte Bewegung (Ein Bietrag zur Theorie optisch whargenommener Bewegung)

    Psychol. Forsch.

    (1929)
    DunckerK.

    A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology

    (1938)
  • Cited by (26)

    • How visual background motion and task difficulty modulate players' performance in a shooting task

      2015, Displays
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, moving backgrounds decrease performance in tasks that are rather simple, namely tasks that involve transient presentations of stationary items and do not mobilize many attentional resources. However, moving visual backgrounds do not always have a negative impact on performance, most likely because human observers are able to voluntarily suppress the OKN by fixating any visual item that is superimposed on the moving background e.g., [19,29–31]. Menozzi and Koga [32] compared how people read a text displayed on a laterally moving, patterned background to a fixed version of the same background.

    • Instruction dependent activation during optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) stimulation: An FMRI study at 3 T

      2010, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the present study, a 30 × 11° stimulus field was used and the possibility exists that with a small field, stare instructions may have caused OKN suppression to occur. OKN suppression is reflected by a loss of slow phase eye movement in the direction of stimulus motion together with a decrease in the number of oppositely-directed quick phases (Wyatt and Pola, 1984, 1988; Pola et al., 1992). However, previous OKN suppression studies (Dieterich et al., 1998, 2000) had to add a fixation point in the stimulus field in order to suppress OKN.

    • Contextual effects on motion perception and smooth pursuit eye movements

      2008, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such context-induced retinal image motion drives a passive pursuit or slow-phase optokinetic response into the opposite direction. In order to smoothly track the target, the OKN has to be suppressed (Lindner and Ilg, 2006; Worfolk and Barnes, 1992; Wyatt and Pola, 1984), possibly causing the delay in initiating pursuit. For moving backgrounds, most studies provide evidence for a spatial averaging of motion signals (motion assimilation).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text