Thematic Mapper characterization of lodgepole pine seral stages in Yellowstone National Park, USA☆
References (50)
An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1988)- et al.
Estimating structural attributes of Douglas fir/western hemlock forest stands from Landsat and SPOT imagery
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1992) - et al.
Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1990) Detection of soil erosion within pinyon-juniper woodlands using Thematic Mapper (TM) data
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1993)- et al.
Role of vegetation in the biosphere
- et al.
Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscape of western Oregon, U.S.A.
Int. J. Remote Sens.
(1995) A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis
Northwest Sci.
(1959)Major vegetation zones of Yellowstone National Park
Forest successional stages in Yellowstone National Park
Nonpyrogeneous climax lodgepole pine communities in Yellowstone National Park
Ecology
(1983)
Yellowstone Vegetation: Consequences of Environment and History in a Natural Setting
Water and energy exchange
Equations for estimating biomass and leaf area of plants in the Pacific Northwest
Experiences and perspective in compiling long-term remote sensing data sets on landscapes and biospheric processes
GeoJournal
Remote sensing of terrestrial ecosystem structure: An ecologist's pragmatic view
Landscape patterns and successional dynamics in the boreal forest
Linking knowledge among spatial and temporal scales: vegetation, atmosphere, climate, and remote sensing
Landscape Ecol.
Concluding remarks
Forestry information content of Thematic Mapper data
Int. J. Remote Sens.
The Successional Tasseled Cap: a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of a coniferous forest
Biophysical remote sensing
Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.
Leaf area determinations for subalpine tree species in the central Rocky Mountains
The Yellowstone fires: issues in landscape ecology
BioScience
Advances in remote sensing technologies for forest surveys and management
Can. J. For. Res.
Landsat MSS and TM post-calibration dynamic ranges, exoatmospheric reflectances and at-satellite temperatures
EOSAT Landsat Technical Notes No. 1
Cited by (72)
Estimating Mediterranean forest parameters using multi seasonal Landsat 8 OLI imagery and an ensemble learning method
2017, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :The results obtained can be used to guide the selection of suitable Landsat 8 OLI bands for estimating relevant forest structural parameters in a regional setting approach. However, since several previous studies have emphasized the effect of ecological conditions, canopy senescence, canopy closure, understory vegetation, and soil background on the observed relationship between reflectance data and forest variables (De La Cueva, 2008; Jakubauskas, 1996), further research is required to determine the particular environmental conditions that affect the phenology of the forest, thereby altering the spectral response. This study assessed the utility of multi-seasonal time-series Landsat-8 OLI satellite imagery for estimating forest stand parameters in a Mediterranean mixed forest, using the RF regression algorithm.
Evaluation of desert management and rehabilitation by petroleum mulch base on temporal spectral analysis and field study (case study: Ahvaz, Iran)
2012, Ecological EngineeringCitation Excerpt :A few methods such as the dark object subtraction (DOS), also known as the histogram minimum method (Cheng and Lei, 2001) and the relative radiometric normalization method (Song et al., 2001) have been applied for the correction of atmospheric effect. In this research, Dark Object Subtraction (DOS) was used as an approach to atmospheric correction, which is perhaps the simplest, yet most widely used image-based absolute atmospheric correction approach for classification and change detection applications (Jakubauskas, 1996; Huguenin et al., 1997). This approach assumes the existence of dark objects (zero or small surface reflectance) throughout a Landsat TM scene and a horizontally homogeneous atmosphere.
Using Landsat-derived disturbance history (1972-2010) to predict current forest structure
2012, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentUsing Landsat imagery to map forest change in southwest China in response to the national logging ban and ecotourism development
2012, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Remote sensing is a crucial tool for forest cover change mapping and monitoring. Mapping old-growth forest distribution (Congalton et al., 1993) and post-disturbance forest succession (Cohen et al., 1995; Fiorella and Ripple, 1993; Jakubauskas, 1996) have long been recognized as essential components of forest biodiversity assessment, and in recent years, multiple forest classes have been mapped even in extremely complex and little-studied environments (Helmer et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2002; Schmook et al., 2011). However, detailed forest type classifications are usually performed for only a single time period, because there are formidable challenges associated with mapping change for multiple classes over several time-steps.
Snow-covered Landsat time series stacks improve automated disturbance mapping accuracy in forested landscapes
2011, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Fortunately, the recent accomplishments and future interests of remote sensing scientists and ecologists appear to be rapidly converging (Rich et al., 2010), and the remote sensing community is poised to provide an abundance of invaluable data at landscape scales to fulfill the expanding needs of ecologists (Huang et al., 2010a; Kennedy et al., 2010). Passive satellite remote sensing platforms in the visible and near infrared (VNIR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) ranges of the electromagnetic spectrum are well-suited for these purposes because of their typically dense temporal coverage spanning the last several decades, moderate spatial resolutions, and comprehensive global coverage (Epting et al., 2005; Goward et al., 2006; Jakubauskas, 1996; Soverel et al., 2010). Until recently, most disturbance mapping and change detection approaches only utilized imagery with limited temporal coverage (Lu et al., 2004; Singh, 1989).
Characterizing the state and processes of change in a dynamic forest environment using hierarchical spatio-temporal segmentation
2011, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Less studied is the characterization of subtle, slow, continuous change related to partial harvest and natural regeneration or decay processes, which have less obvious effects on the landscape (Coops et al., 2006). Forest successional stages have been described (Cohen et al., 1995; Helmer et al., 2000; Jakubauskas, 1996), but studying the transitions between development stages is less common: Peterson and Nilson (1993) described trajectories of reflectance change in secondary succession of mono-specific birch and pine stands in Estonia; Schroeder et al. (2007) characterized patterns of recovery post-harvest in Western Oregon, and Vogelmann et al. (2009) characterized forest decline and mortality caused by persistent insect defoliation from 1988 to 2006 in New Mexico. Two images acquired at different dates may be sufficient for identifying landscape change (Coppin & Bauer, 1996); however, the use of more than two image dates is recognized as a superior technique when the objective is to characterize the rate of change (as opposed to just the presence or absence of change) (Goodwin et al., 2008).
- ☆
This research was supported by a National Aeronautics and Space Administration Global Climate Change Fellowship (NASA NGT-30062) and a grant from the University of Wyoming/National Parks Service Research Center. Field assistance was contributed by Todd Sutphin and Diane Debinski, while Jerry Whistler, Clayton Blodgett, Vicky Varner, and Terry Slocum provided technical advice. The support and interest of Dr. Mark Boyce and Dr. Henry Harlow (Directors, UW/NPS Research Station), Dr. John Varley (Yellowstone Center for Resources), and Yellowstone rangers Robert Siebert, Dennis Young, and Dennis Lojko is appreciated. Comments on the manuscript by Kevin P. Price and three anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript.