Linguistic modularity? A case study of a ‘Savant’ linguist

doi:10.1016/0024-3841(91)90034-3

Lingua

Volume 84, Issue 4, August 1991, Pages 315-351

https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90034-3 Get rights and content

Abstract

We provide a preliminary report on a young man who is institutionalised because he is unable to look after himself, but who has a remarkable talent for acquiring and using foreign languages. After documenting the breadth of his expertise across some sixteen languages, we investigate his command of his native language, English, and the extent to which his linguistic competence is integrated into his general cognitive ability, and we briefly discuss the implications of these results for Fodor's modularity hypothesis. The results of the experiments devised to test these aspects of his linguistic and inferential abilities then provide the basis for a more detailed analysis of his command of one specific language, Modern Greek. We concentrate on properties associated with the pro-drop parameter, in particular that-t effects and the possibility of post-verbal subjects, contrasting his performance in Greek, a pro-drop language, with English, a non-pro-drop language. The pattern of results obtained indicate that he is not acquiring a ‘first’ language several times over, but it remains for future investigation to determine how characteristic of normal second-language learners his acquisition is. We also tentatively interpret his performance in Greek as evidence in favour of the claim that the phenomena associated with the pro-drop parameter do constitute a natural class, and specifically provide support for Rizzi's revision of the parameter in terms of relativised minimality. We emphasize that these results are preliminary and hope to refine and extend our analyses in subsequent contributions.

References (31)

D.V.M. Bishop
TROG: Test for reception of grammar
(1982)
D. Blakemore
Semantic constraints on relevance
(1987)
N. Chomsky
Aspects of the theory of syntax
(1965)
N. Chomsky
Lectures on government and binding
(1981)
N. Chomsky
Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use
(1986)
H. Clahsen
Parameterised grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults
J. Duckett
Idiot savants: Super-specialization in mentally retarded persons
(1976)
H. Dulay et al.
Natural sequences in child second language acquisition
Language Learning
(1974)
J. Fodor
The modularity of mind
(1983)

C.C. Fries

Teaching and learning English as a foreign language

(1947)

B. Hermelin et al.

Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Rules and regularities

Psychological Medicine

(1986)

B. Hermelin et al.

Musical inventiveness of five idiots-savants

Psychological Medicine

(1987)

M.J.A. Howe

Fragments of genius

(1989)

R. Lado

Linguistics across cultures

(1957)

Cited by (35)

Pragmatic effects on semantic learnability: Insights from evidentiality
2023, Journal of Memory and Language
Cross-linguistically prevalent semantic distinctions are widely assumed to be easier to learn because they reflect natural concepts. Here we propose an alternative, pragmatic perspective that links both the cross-linguistic prevalence and the learnability of semantic distinctions to communicative pressures. We focus on evidentiality (the encoding of the speaker’s information source). Across languages, grammatical evidential systems are more likely to encode indirect sources (especially, reported information) compared to direct sources (e.g., visual perception). On a conceptual account, this seems puzzling, since humans reason naturally about how seeing connects to knowing. On a pragmatic account, however, the predominant encoding of the speaker’s reportative compared to visual information sources can be explained in terms of informativeness (visual access is ubiquitous and potentially more reliable, hence less marked). We tested the pragmatic account in four experiments. Adult English speakers exposed to novel miniature evidential morphological systems consistently showed higher learning rates for systems with a single indirect (reportative) compared to a single direct (visual) evidential morpheme (Experiment 1). This pattern persisted even when participants were given specific cues to the target meanings (Experiment 2) and partly extended to cases where evidential meanings were conveyed through visual, not linguistic, means (Experiment 3). It also persisted when the evidential morphemes had to be learned from different materials (Experiment 4). We conclude that the cross-linguistic bias to mark reportative/indirect over visual/direct sources of information has pragmatic roots that also shape the learnability of evidential semantic distinctions.
Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: Modularity and innateness
1997, Journal of Neurolinguistics
This paper aims to provide insight into the contentious issue of the hypothesised innate basis to domain specific, modular aspects of language [Fodor, F.J., The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983; Chomsky, N., Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht, 1981]. In order to do this a distinction is made between modular language abilities, non-modular language abilities (i.e. language abilities outside the language module in question) and non-linguistic cognitive tasks. Based on this distinction, a series of investigations were carried out into the abilities of a 10 year old boy (AZ) with Grammatical specific language impairment. The investigations of modular language abilities focused on inflectional morphology (agreement, and regular and irregular past tense marking) and syntax (knowledge and use of phrase structure, thematic role assignment and Binding Principles). The investigations of non-modular language abilities included tests of pragmatic inference and verbal analogical reasoning. Non-linguistic assessments included standardised tests and a test of visual transitive inference. A clear dissociation was revealed between AZ's severely impaired modular language abilities and good non-modular and non-linguistic abilities. AZ's performance on the tests was compared with 36 younger language control children (aged 5:4–8:9) and 12 age matched control children. Z-scores computed for AZ's performance in comparison with the normal children, based on standardised language measures (vocabulary, morphology) and his chronological age, revealed a significant impairment in morpho-syntactic abilities and normal or above average abilities on the non-modular language tasks and non-linguistic cognitive tasks. I propose that the discreteness of AZ's language impairment indicates that an underlying modular language impairment is the most parsimonious explanation for his deficit. A deficit with syntactic structural representations characterised by the Representational Deficit for Dependent Relationships [van der Lely, H.K.J. and Stollwerck, L., Binding theory and specifically language impaired children. Cognition, 1997.]can account for his morphological and syntactic impairments. The data provide empirical evidence to support the innate bases to domain specific and modular aspects of language.
Concerning the generative paradigm
1996, Journal of Pragmatics
Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation
1996, Lingua
The focus of this study is the acquisition and underlying syntactic representation of passive sentences in a subgroup of 15 ‘Grammatical specifically language impaired’ (SLI) children (aged 9:3–12:10) and 36 younger normally developing, language ability (LA) control children (aged 5:5–8:9). In particular, the paper is concerned with the differences between a verbal and adjectival passive interpretation of the passive participle in short passive sentences. Van der Lely (1994) proposed that SLI children have a ‘Representational Deficit for Dependent Relationships’ (RDDR). The syntactic characterization of this deficit is not altogether clear, but I propose that problems with Spec-Head relations may provide an adequate description. This proposal predicts that SLI children should be able to derive an adjectival passive but not a verbal passive representation. Active, full and short progressive passive, and ambiguous (potentially adjectival) short passive sentences were investigated. A picture pointing response paradigm, in which the child chose one of four pictures, enabled responses to be differentiated: i.e. transitive (actional), adjectival (stative), and reversal (where thematic roles normally assigned to the subject or object were reversed). The test sentences were also administered to 12 adult subjects. The study revealed that Grammatical SLI children were significantly worse at interpreting transitive verbal passive sentences than the younger LA controls. The SLI children, and occasionally the younger LA controls, may interpret an unambiguously verbal passive sentence as an adjectival-stative passive. The SLI children showed a strong preference for an adjectival interpretation for the ambiguous passive sentences. Differences in the syntactic representations of verbal and adjectival passive sentences can account for the findings. The data indicate that the Grammatical SLI children and young children have problems deriving the syntactic representation underlying a verbal passive sentence but not the less complex adjectival-stative passive. The findings from this study for Grammatical SLI children are consistent with the proposed RDDR characterized by problems in Spec-Head relations. The study provides new empirical evidence for the different syntactic nature of verbal and adjectival passive sentences and has implications for language acquisition and the modularity of language.
Neuropsychology and linguistic talent
1994, Journal of Neurolinguistics
We report on the unique case of a polyglot savant who is institutionalised because he is unable to look after himself, but who has knowledge of some fifteen to twenty languages. We provide details of his medical and psychometric background and then document his linguistic ability in detail. We argue that the case provides evidence for Fodor's modularity hypothesis (though with some quasimodular structure needing to be attributed to the central system) and for the linguistic distinction between a functional and a conceptual lexicon. We also report on the results of an MRI scan carried out on the subject. While these may reveal some abnormalities of the cerebellum, there is no differential cortical development which could underlie his linguistic ability. We conclude that, while pathological studies are making our understanding of the links between the neural and the linguistic ever clearer, we are still largely ignorant of the nature of those links in cases of normal or enhanced ability.
New conceptualizations of linguistic giftedness
2016, Language Teaching

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Linguistic modularity? A case study of a ‘Savant’ linguist

Abstract

TROG: Test for reception of grammar

Semantic constraints on relevance

Aspects of the theory of syntax

Lectures on government and binding

Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use

Parameterised grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults

Idiot savants: Super-specialization in mentally retarded persons

Natural sequences in child second language acquisition

Language Learning

The modularity of mind

Teaching and learning English as a foreign language

Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Rules and regularities

Psychological Medicine

Musical inventiveness of five idiots-savants

Psychological Medicine

Fragments of genius

Linguistics across cultures