Interpreting inclusion: A contribution to the study of the child's cognitive and linguistic development

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(78)90131-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Six experiments are reported which examine the young child's ability to compare included and nonincluded sets. Results indicate that with certain forms of task presentation most 3- to 5-year-old children can compare part with whole. Further, errors which occur in inclusion tasks are similar to errors which occur in tasks involving comparison of nonincluded sets. Thus young children can solve inclusion problems, and their customary failure to do so does not arise because the problem requires comparison of a whole with an included part. Employing a distinction between intended tasks (those which the adult wishes the child to complete) and received tasks (those which the child, in fact, completes) the studies indicate how linguistic and perceptual aspects of the presented information may interact with the child's assumptions about the nature of the task to be completed.

References (24)

  • B. Inhelder et al.

    The early growth of logic in the child

    (1964)
  • J.R. Jennings

    The effect of verbal and pictorial presentation on class-inclusion competence and performance

    Psychonomic Science

    (1970)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Part-whole number knowledge in preschool children

      2003, Journal of Mathematical Behavior
    • Typical and Atypical Child and Adolescent Development 4: Cognition, Intelligence and Learning

      2022, Typical and Atypical Child and Adolescent Development 4: Cognition, Intelligence and Learning
    • The Development of Size Sequencing Skills: An Empirical and Computational Analysis

      2019, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The experiments reported here were conceived, conducted, analysed and written up in draft form by James McGarrigle, University of Edinburgh. Before they could be completed in a form suitable for publication, James McGarrigle died on 4 June, 1975, aged 27. The present paper is based mainly on a draft of his doctoral dissertation, supplemented by reference to his published papers (McGarrigle & Donaldson, 1975; Donaldson & McGarrigle, 1974). In preparing the present paper the advice and encouragement of Margaret Donaldson have been of great benefit.

    View full text