Elsevier

Applied Acoustics

Volume 6, Issue 3, July 1973, Pages 219-232
Applied Acoustics

Are our noise laws adequate?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682X(73)90014-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Britain has a number of laws and regulations which are aimed at controlling excessive noise. These laws appear to be based on the assumption that everyone reacts in a similar manner when exposed to noise, and the criteria which the laws use are concerned with establishing at what ‘level’ of noise exposure the ‘average’ person is likely to suffer annoyance.

In this paper we examine some of the available evidence on how individuals react to noise, and demonstrate that the concept of the ‘average’ person is relatively meaningless. This conclusion further indicates that the criteria for noise control are inadequate in that, for a substantial number of people, they do not provide the protection intended. It is shown that not only is there a wide ‘spread’ in the degree of annoyance due to noise, but also the population tends to show inhomogeneity in the nature of its response. There seem to be at least two types of person, one who ‘learns to live with’ the noise, and gradually adapts to it, and another type who becomes progressively more disturbed by it, or, it could be said, is ‘sensitive to noise’. There is also evidence that, in some circumstances, factors relating to the individual can be more valuable in predicting the response to noise than is the nature of the noise itself.

These findings imply that, for adequate protection of the individual against annoying noise, we must not only study the noise, but also the personality and personal factors of the individual.

References (26)

  • Noise, Final Report

    (1963)
  • E.J. Richards

    Noise and society

    Journal of the Royal Society of Arts

    (1971)
  • Second Survey of Aircraft Noise Annoyance Around London (Heathrow) Airport

    (1971)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Urban transport justice

      2016, Journal of Transport Geography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Exposure to noise from road traffic has been studied for decades because of its health impacts (e.g. Poenaru et al., 1978). Noise causes physiological reactions characteristic for stress that seriously affect health (e.g. Bryan and Tempest, 1973) and is linked to tinnitus, mood changes, chronic sleep disturbance and lack of recovery from tiredness, nervousness, anxiety and phobia, as well as cardiovascular diseases and cognitive impairment of children (Babisch, 2011, 2015; Öhrström, 1995; Poenaru et al., 1978; WHO, 2011). Noise exposure can also negatively affect speech communication, concentration ability and the performance of tasks.

    • Annoyance from road traffic noise: A review

      2001, Journal of Environmental Psychology
    • Noise in the environment: A social perspective

      1981, Journal of Environmental Psychology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text