Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking
Section snippets
Method
To compare thiy and thuh, we (a) identified every instance of thiy in a large corpus of spontaneous conversations, (b) created a matched sample of instances of thuh, and (c) checked for differences between the two samples.
As data we used the transcripts of 50 face-to-face conversations (numbered S.1.1 through S.3.6) from Svartvik and Quirk's (1980) corpus of English conversation, the so-called London–Lund Corpus (hereafter the LLC). These transcripts totaled about 170,000 words, or 850 pages in
Results
Speech was immediately suspended 81% of the time after thiy, but only 7% of the time after thuh, a ratio of 12 to 1 (χ2=505.51, p<.001). The rate of suspensions was roughly the same after thiy as after thi:y, 78% to 80% (χ2=.14, p>.5; NPs containing both thiy and thi:y were not included in this analysis). These data strongly support the hypothesis that thiy signals an immediate suspension of speech. But why did speakers suspend their speech after thiy? We will examine (a) pauses, fillers, and
Discussion
In spontaneous talk, speakers try to get their addressees to identify their utterances as efficiently as possible. The ideal way, ordinarily, is by speaking fluently, but speakers inevitably run into production problems that they and their addressees have to resolve. At one extreme, speakers can notice and correct a problem even before it becomes audible to their addressees. At the other extreme, speakers can fail to notice a problem, correcting it later only at the prompting of their
Acknowledgements
We thank C.C. Levelt, W.J.M. Levelt, P.J.A. Meijer, and E.E. Shriberg for suggestions on several issues in this research. The work was supported by NSF Grants SBR-9309612 and IRI-9314967.
References (21)
- Blackmer, E.R., & Mitton, J.L. (1991). Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech....
- Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University...
- Clark, H.H., & Schaefer, E.R. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13,...
- Clark, H.H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22,...
- Erman, B. (1987). Pragmatic expressions in English: A study of you know, you see, and I mean in face-to-face...
- Fox Tree, J.E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous...
- Grice, H.P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66,...
- Grice, H.P. (1968). Utterer's meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. Foundations of Language, 4,...
- Ito, J. (1991). Prosodic minimality in Japanese. CSL 26-II: Papers from the parasession on the syllable in phonetics...
- Keating, P.A., Byrd, D., Flemming,E., & Todaka, Y. (1994). Phonetic analyses of words and segment variation using the...
Cited by (161)
What do we know about the mechanisms of response planning in dialog?
2023, Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and TheoryBeyond linear order: The role of argument structure in speaking
2019, Cognitive PsychologyFifty years of change to prevocalic definite article allomorphy in Australian English
2023, Journal of the International Phonetic AssociationInvestigating syntactic structure and processing in the auditory modality
2023, The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Syntax