Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 34, Issue 2, April 1986, Pages 510-518
Animal Behaviour

Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80119-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Minnows in shoals used a spectrum of behaviours to discriminate stalking models of pike. Predator recognition was initially based on model shape and size, with identification being confirmed using information on markings gathered by minnows during predator inspection visits. Minnow behaviour indicated that shoals regarded the most realistic model as the greates threat. Conversely, habituation of the anti-predator response in repeated stalks was most evident with the least realistic model. Implications for the design of models used in predation experiments are discussed.

References (35)

  • HartP.J.B. et al.

    Cost of prey capture, growth rate and ration size in pike, Esox lucius L., as functions of prey weight

    J. Fish Biol.

    (1984)
  • HungtingfordF.A.

    An investigation of the territorial behaviour of three-spined sticklebacks using Principal Components Analysis

    Anim. Behav.

    (1976)
  • KarplusI. et al.

    A preliminary experimental analysis of predator face recognition by Chromis caerulus (Pisces, Pomacentridae)

    Z. Tierpsychol.

    (1982)
  • LorenzK.

    Vergleichende Verhaltenforschung

    Zool. Anzeiger Suppl.

    (1939)
  • MackintoshN.J.

    General principles of learning

  • MagurranA.E.

    Individual differences in fish behaviour

  • MagurranA.E. et al.

    Vigilant behaviour and shoal size in minnows

    Z. Tierpsychol.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (110)

    • Predator-awareness training in terrestrial vertebrates: Progress, problems and possibilities

      2020, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies varied in the number of training sessions, ranging from one to more than forty, but most (30/40) incorporated 10 or fewer exposures to reduce the risk of habituation. Learning about predators can occur successfully with very few exposures to a negative event (Magurran and Girling, 1986; Curio et al., 1978; Feeney and Langmore, 2013; Maloney and McLean, 1995; Vieth et al., 1980). The risk of habituation appeared to vary among studies.

    • Screening anti-predator behaviour in fish larvae exposed to environmental pollutants

      2020, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, the impaired startle response due to exposure to contaminates has been reported to have a direct impact on fish survival following predator strikes, which could have dramatic effects on recruitment (Bhattacharyya et al., 2019; Mesa et al., 1994; Scott and Sloman, 2004; Weis and Candelmo, 2012). Second, whereas animals have an innate ability to recognize their predators and are less likely to habituate to predator forms (Magurran and Girling, 1986), altered habituation of the startle response is still a major problem for larvae, since unnecessary escape responses supposes a high cost of energy resulting in the exhaustion of organisms or it may attract the attention of both visual and mechanoreceptive predators (Batabyal et al., 2017; Killen and Brown, 2006). Therefore any deficiency in either direction of habituation is very likely to compromise larvae survival.

    • The influence of cage conditioning on the performance and behavior of Japanese flounder reared for stock enhancement: Burying, feeding, and threat response

      2014, Journal of Sea Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, live predators do not always actively participate once trials begin (Fairchild, 1998). A disadvantage of using model predators is that prey may not respond as they would to a real predator and/or only a small range of anti-predator behaviors may be performed (Magurran and Girling, 1986). The model predator in the present study provided only visual and not olfactory cues, but represented a realistic size/shape/figure of a potential threat that fish would be expected to encounter in the wild, such as the longfin snake-eel, Pisodonophis cancrivorus.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text