Elsevier

Toxicology Letters

Volume 205, Issue 3, 10 September 2011, Pages 279-284
Toxicology Letters

Mainstream smoke of the waterpipe: Does this environmental matrix reveal as significant source of toxic compounds?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.06.017Get rights and content

Abstract

In recent years the number of waterpipe smokers has increased substantially worldwide. Here we report on the concentrations of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in waterpipe smoke and the analysis of selected biomarkers indicative for the body burden in waterpipe users. We further identify high amounts of unburned humectants (glycerol and propylene glycol) in the waterpipe smoke as main part of the so-called “tar” fraction. These results give cause for serious concern. For standardization we applied a machine smoking protocol. Smoke was collected on glass fiber filters and analyzed for nicotine, water, humectants, TSNAs, and PAHs. In addition, we determined carbon monoxide and found high amounts in the smoke being causative for high levels of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) in the blood of smokers. In comparison to the reference cigarette 3R4F, the nicotine contents were 10-times higher, but TSNA levels were found lower in waterpipe smoke. This finding explained the low levels of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol detected in the urine of waterpipe smokers. Finally, the levels of benzo[a]pyrene were three times higher in waterpipe smoke compared to the reference cigarette. Altogether, the data presented in this study point to the health hazards associated with the consumption of waterpipes.

Highlights

• First study reporting on tobacco-specific nitrosamines present in waterpipe smoke. • We identified unburned humectants as main part of the so-called “tar” fraction. • We detected high levels of carcinogenic PAHs in the waterpipe smoke. • High amounts of CO in the smoke cause high COHb levels in the blood of smokers. • First biomonitoring study on NNAL in the 24 h-urine of waterpipe smokers.

Introduction

The waterpipe is a traditional aid for tobacco consumption in Asia and Northern Africa (Maziak et al., 2004a). Although exact numbers are missing to date, web blogs, “hookah bar” advertisements and the advent of popular waterpipe stores indicate that both the general interest and the number of young people smoking waterpipes have considerably grown in recent years in European countries and North America (BZgA, 2008, Jackson and Aveyard, 2008, Primack et al., 2008).

There are major differences in the consumption of waterpipes and cigarettes: The flavored tobacco, mainly used for waterpipes in Europe and the US, contains huge amounts of humectants such as glycerol and propylene glycol. The humectants prevent the tobacco from burning thereby yielding a smooth and pleasant smoke. Furthermore, the heat for the waterpipe is generated using charcoal, which is placed on top of the tobacco head. Studies from Lebanon showed that smoking habits differ greatly between waterpipe and cigarette smokers (Shihadeh et al., 2004). For instance, average inhalation volumes were about 530 ml for single waterpipe puffs whereas the puff volumes found for cigarette smoking were in the range of 35–60 ml (Hammond et al., 2007). Furthermore, the smoking time differs greatly. For a waterpipe with 10 g tobacco the smoking time amounted to almost 60 min and 171 puffs whereas the time for a cigarette is between 5 and 10 min (6–11 puffs). Shihadeh and colleagues established a machine-smoking protocol, which is based on the investigations of smoking behavior of waterpipe smokers in Lebanon, and investigated several constituents of waterpipe smoke such as carbon monoxide (CO), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), various aldehydes (e.g., formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein), and certain metals (e.g., lead, chromium, arsenic) (Al Rashidi et al., 2008, Monzer et al., 2008, Sepetdjian et al., 2008, Shihadeh, 2003, Shihadeh and Saleh, 2005).

In the present study three major questions were addressed: firstly, we determined the levels of tar, nicotine and CO in the waterpipe smoke. To assess the internal body burden of these toxins, biomonitoring of nicotine and carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) in the blood and of cotinine in the urine of smokers was performed. Since the amounts of tar were high in waterpipe smoke, we investigated its composition and found high amounts of humectants. Secondly, the levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) were measured in tobacco, tobacco smoke and in the urine of consumers. Since N′-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) have been classified as human carcinogens (IARC, 2007), we determined the contents of these compounds in waterpipe tobacco and smoke. As biomarker of NNK its metabolite 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) was analyzed. Thirdly, various PAHs such as benzo[a]pyrene were measured in the waterpipe smoke. Benzo[a]pyrene has been classified as human carcinogen (IARC, 2010) and serves as well-established carcinogenic lead compound of environmental PAH mixtures since decades.

Section snippets

Reagents

All chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade. A list of potential suppliers is given in the supplementary part (see Table S-1).

CO calibration gas was obtained from Air Liquide (Berlin Germany) and 92 mm glass fiber filter pads were from Borgwaldt KC (Hamburg, Germany). Waterpipe tobacco was purchased from Nakhla Tobacco (Two Apples flavor, Nakhla Tobacco, Egypt). Perforated aluminum foil (Ø 15.5 cm, 25 holes) was obtained from Falu, Ballingen, Germany. Quick lighting charcoal (Ø 40 

Total particulate matter (TPM), nicotine, water, tar and carbon monoxide (CO)

Data on TPM, nicotine, water and CO contents in the smoke of waterpipes and 3R4F reference cigarettes are compiled in Table 1. The average values for TPM, tobacco and charcoal consumption (mean ± SD) for 15 replicate smoking sessions were 2.71 ± 0.20 g, 3.87 ± 0.36 g, and 8.22 ± 0.10 g, respectively. In comparison to the TPM values for 3R4F reference cigarettes (11.0 mg) reported in the literature (Liu et al., 2009), a waterpipe session yielded 250-fold more TPM. The water content of TPM was 1.76 ± 0.20 g for

Discussion

To analyze and quantify compounds released from waterpipes during smoking, we applied an adapted and reproducible smoking protocol according to the parameters worked-out in a field study by Shihadeh and coworkers where 52 waterpipe smokers in Beirut were systematically monitored (Shihadeh et al., 2004). We decided to use these smoking parameters since detailed informations for European waterpipe smokers were not available and also for better comparison of our results with published data.

It

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgments

We thank Karsten Schoen and Timo Otter for their excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by an internal grant of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).

References (32)

Cited by (80)

  • Contributions of charcoal, tobacco, and syrup to the toxicity and particle distribution of waterpipe tobacco smoke

    2019, Toxicology Letters
    Citation Excerpt :

    Previous studies have found shisha to contain the humectants propylene glycol and glycerol at between 5 and 60% by mass and that these compounds lead to the presence of toxic carbonyls such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein in the smoke. ( Schubert et al., 2011; 2012) To investigate the role of the humectant in generating particulate matter, we measured particle distributions for glycerol at a viscosity similar to syrup (92% with water). Compared to syrup, glycerol generated a similar size distribution but fewer total particles (Fig. 4, Table 1).

  • Urinary NNAL in hookah smokers and non-smokers after attending a hookah social event in a hookah lounge or a private home

    2017, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A study found that NNK concentration in flavored hookah tobacco was 41.1 ng/g tobacco which was equivalent to about 5% of the NNK concentration found in cigarette tobacco (798 ng/g tobacco) (Schubert et al., 2011). However, due to higher amounts of tobacco typically used for one hookah smoking session compared to smoking one cigarette (10 g vs. 0.78 g), respectively, the NNK content of hookah tobacco smoke (46.4 ng/session) was reported to be equivalent to about 50% of the content detected in cigarette smoke (101 ng/cigarette) (Schubert et al., 2011). NNK uptake among hookah smokers may vary as hookah smokers may smoke more than one hookah session on the day they smoke, or they may use up to 20 g hookah tobacco per one smoking session (Kassem et al., 2014a; Primack et al., 2016).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text