ReviewEvidence compendium and advice on social distancing and other related measures for response to an influenza pandemic
Introduction
In an average season between 0.3 and 9.8% children present with influenza for medical attention; this incidence is greater in children under 5 years of age [1]. Globally, an estimated 90 million cases of influenza occur each year in children aged under 5, of which an estimated 20 million are associated with acute lower respiratory tract infection [2]. For pandemic strains the burden can be greater, with elevated hospital and emergency departments admission rates throughout the population [1], elevated death rates and wider socioeconomic impacts [3]. Pandemic plans have been developed by organisations such as the WHO, individual countries and local groups such as businesses, in an attempt to mitigate such risks. Amongst the public health measures considered (e.g., vaccination, antiviral stock piling), those that promote reduced infectious contact in societies, or “social distancing” may complement other pandemic planning measures in decreasing the likelihood and severity of pandemic influenza transmission.
In contrast to technological interventions such as vaccination and anti-viral drugs, published evidence of the efficacy or effectiveness of individual measures for social distancing is limited. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) published a technical report on public health measures to reduce pandemic influenza impact [4] that identified gaps in our understanding of the role of social distancing measures in pandemic planning. However, the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic has stimulated more research in this area, including clinical and epidemiological studies, and mathematical modeling. Pandemic plans in a number of countries, including Australia are currently being revised in light of published reviews of their effectiveness and therefore, it is timely to identify and review the latest evidence regarding the potential impacts of social distancing and related measures [5]. This review assessed the impact of the following measures: proactive or reactive school closure, workplace closure, working from home, isolation of cases and/or contacts (quarantine), internal mobility restriction and cancellation of mass events.
Section snippets
Search strategy
Database searching was undertaken by an experienced medical librarian (CK) in December 2012. A copy of the full search can be obtained by contacting the authors; in short, the following databases/sources were searched - Ovid Medline (1946 to November Week 3 2012), Ovid Embase (1980 to December Week 3 2012), Cochrane Library (Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 12 of 12, December 2012, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects Issue 4 of 4, October 2012, Central Register of Controlled Trials
Results
The effectiveness and limitations of each individual intervention are summarised in Table 1, Table 2, and described below.
Evidence of effectiveness
Studies suggest that school closure, whether proactive or reactive, reduces transmission of influenza and delays the epidemic peak. The majority of modeling and observational studies suggest a reduction in influenza occurrence or transmission following school closure but with wide variance (range 1-50%) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. Other studies, in which transmission between children is assumed to be very influential, have
Evidence of effectiveness
We found only 3 empirical studies examining the impact of changes to work arrangements on influenza transmission risks, with a US study during 2009-10 finding reduced risks of self-reported ILI among individuals who could work from home (8.2% versus 12.8%, p<0.05) or stay home from work for 7-10 days (8.8% vs 12.2% p<0.05) compared with those who could not [50]. In a quasi-cluster randomised trial conducted in Japan in 2009, the workplace policy of being able to remain at home on full pay
Evidence of effectiveness
There were limited studies evaluating these measures, with moderate effectiveness found in modeling simulations. A Japanese modeling study suggested that total community infections would fall as the proportion of children or adults isolated at home increased [16], with support from other modeling studies [56], [57].
Simulations of quarantining household contacts of index cases also suggests benefit [19], [58], [59]. In a modeling study applied to Mongolia (a useful example in terms of its
Evidence of effectiveness
Modeling studies comprise most recent research in this area, although a systematic review suggests some mass gatherings are associated with increased influenza transmission, while archival studies of the 1918-19 pandemic imply that restricting mass gatherings was beneficial, particularly with early implementation [74]. A modeling paper suggested that mass gatherings shortly before the epidemic peak could increase the peak height by about 10% but at other times, the impact would be small.[75]
Overall effectiveness and quality of the evidence
A large number of published studies examining social distancing have been conducted since the 2009 pandemic of influenza. Overall, social distancing measures are found to be moderately effective.
School or workplace closures and case-based measures such as isolation and quarantine of contacts are found to be at least modestly effective, but are likely to be costly and disruptive. Mobility restrictions may not be effective unless prohibitively high restrictions are applied and are likely to be
Conclusion
Since the 2009 pandemic, more published evidence on the effectiveness of social distancing measures in mitigating pandemic influenza has appeared. Overall, social distancing measures appear modestly effective and many are likely to be acceptable in the short term, but there is a lack of strong evidence.
Future Research Directions
- •
As there is a dearth of high quality studies, controlled trials should be prioritised in this field
- •
The evidence compendium needs to be updated periodically to incorporate emerging evidence
- •
Systematic reviews on the interaction between individual measures should be undertaken, including wider interventions like face masks, vaccines and antivirals
Educational Aims
The readers will become familiar with:
- •
Critical evaluation of the impact of social distancing measures against pandemic influenza in light of the latest evidence
- •
Direct and indirect costs of implementing certain social distancing measures (e.g., school and workplace closures) in mitigating pandemic influenza
- •
Acceptability of social distancing measures among members of public and their expectations
Acknowledgement
This study was funded by the Australian Department of Health obtained through a tender process (RFQ No: DoHA/130/1213). Iman Ridda holds an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (630739) and James Wood has received partial salary support from NHMRC CRE 1021963.
References (82)
- et al.
Global burden of respiratory infections due to seasonal influenza in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lancet
(2011) - et al.
Closure of schools during an influenza pandemic
Lancet Infect Dis
(2009) - et al.
The impact of school holidays on the social mixing patterns of school children
Epidemics
(2011) - et al.
Social and economic impact of school closure resulting from pandemic influenza A/H1N1
J Infect
(2011) - et al.
Economic evaluation of influenza pandemic mitigation strategies in the United States using a stochastic microsimulation transmission model
Value Health
(2009) - et al.
Optimal control for pandemic influenza: the role of limited antiviral treatment and isolation
J Theor Biol
(2010) Legal rights during pandemics: federalism, rights and public health laws--a view from Australia
Public Health
(2009)Pandethics
Public Health
(2009)Could influenza transmission be reduced by restricting mass gatherings? Towards an evidence-based policy framework.
Epidemiol Glob Health
(2011)- et al.
The effect of public health interventions on the spread of influenza among cities
J Theor Biol
(2012)
Public response to the 2009 influenza A H1N1 pandemic: A polling study in five countries
Lancet Infect Dis
Clinical and socioeconomic impact of pediatric seasonal and pandemic influenza
Hum Vaccin Immunother
We should not be complacent about our population-based public health response to the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century
BMC Public Health
[Impact of school closings on the influenza A (H1N1) outbreak in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina]
Rev Panam Salud Publica
Cost-effective strategies for mitigating a future influenza pandemic with H1N1 2009 characteristics
PLoS ONE
The effect of school dismissal on rates of influenza-like illness in New York City schools during the spring 2009 novel H1N1 outbreak
J Sch Health
Association between school closure and subsequent absenteeism during a seasonal influenza epidemic
Epidemiology
School closure may be effective in reducing transmission of respiratory viruses in the community
Epidemiol Infect
Effect of school closure on the incidence of influenza among school-age children in Arizona
Public Health Rep
The impact of illness and the impact of school closure on social contact patterns
Health Technol Assess
Characterizing the epidemiology of the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in Mexico
PLoS Med
Transmission dynamics, border entry screening, and school holidays during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, China
Emerg Infect Dis
Measures against transmission of pandemic H1N1 influenza in Japan in 2009: simulation model
Euro Surveill
School closure and mitigation of pandemic (H1N1) 2009, Hong Kong
Emerg Infect Dis
Estimating the impact of school closure on social mixing behaviour and the transmission of close contact infections in eight European countries
BMC Infect Dis
Likely effectiveness of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions for mitigating influenza virus transmission in Mongolia
Bull World Health Organ
Effects of school closure on incidence of pandemic influenza in Alberta, Canada
Ann Intern Med
Estimating the impact of school closure on influenza transmission from Sentinel data
Nature
School closure is currently the main strategy to mitigate influenza A(H1N1)v: a modeling study
Euro Surveill
Targeted social distancing design for pandemic influenza
Emerg Infect Dis
Influenza (H1N1) 2009 outbreak and school closure, Osaka Prefecture
Japan. Emerg Infect Dis
Novel H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection in Bangkok, Thailand: effects of school closures
Asian Biomed
School closures and student contact patterns
Emerg Infect Dis
Temporal factors in school closure policy for mitigating the spread of influenza
J Public Health Policy
Household responses to pandemic (H1N1) 2009-related school closures, Perth, Western Australia
Emerg Infect Dis
Household effects of school closure during pandemic (H1N1) 2009, Pennsylvania, USA
Emerg Infect Dis
Prevention. Impact of seasonal influenza-related school closures on families - Southeastern Kentucky, February 2008
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Likely impact of school and childcare closures on public health workforce during an influenza pandemic: a survey
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep
Prevention. Parental attitudes and experiences during school dismissals related to 2009 influenza A (H1N1) — United States, 2009
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Cited by (123)
Identifying factors related to school closures due to COVID-19 in the Middle East and North Africa region
2022, International Journal of Educational DevelopmentEmergency Remote Learning for Children with Disabilities during the Pandemic: Navigating Parental Roles and Supports
2024, Journal of Child and Family StudiesSocial Distancing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associated Factors, Health Outcomes, and Implications
2024, Family and Community HealthApplication of Health Belief Model to Comprehend Adherence to COVID‑19‑appropriate Behavior among COVID‑19 Vaccinees in Himachal Pradesh
2023, Indian Journal of Public Health