Elsevier

Protist

Volume 161, Issue 3, July 2010, Pages 466-478
Protist

Original Paper
Molecular Phylogeny of Noctilucoid Dinoflagellates (Noctilucales, Dinophyceae)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2009.12.005Get rights and content

The order Noctilucales or class Noctiluciphyceae encompasses three families of aberrant dinoflagellates (Noctilucaceae, Leptodiscaceae and Kofoidiniaceae) that, at least in some life stages, lack typical dinoflagellate characters such as the ribbon-like transversal flagellum or condensed chromosomes. Noctiluca scintillans, the first dinoflagellate to be described, has been intensively investigated. However, its phylogenetic position based on the small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequence is unstable and controversial. Noctiluca has been placed either as an early diverging lineage that diverged after Oxyrrhis and before the dinokaryotes -core dinoflagellates- or as a recent lineage branching from unarmoured dinoflagellates in the order Gymnodiniales. So far, the lack of other noctilucoid sequences has hampered the elucidation of their phylogenetic relationships to other dinoflagellates. Furthermore, even the monophyly of the noctilucoids remained uncertain. We have determined SSU rRNA gene sequences for Kofoidiniaceae, those of the type Spatulodinium (=Gymnodinium) pseudonoctiluca and another Spatulodinium species, as well as of two species of Kofoidinium, and the first gene sequence of Leptodiscaceae, that of Abedinium (=Leptophyllus) dasypus. These taxa were collected from their type localities, the English Channel and the NW Mediterranean Sea, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses place the Noctilucales as a monophyletic group at a basal position close to parasites of the Marine Alveolate Group I (MAGI) and the Syndiniales (MAGII), before the core of dinokaryotic dinoflagellates, although with moderate support.

Introduction

Noctiluca scintillans (Macartney) Kofoid is the first known dinoflagellate (Baker 1753; Slabber 1771). Initially classified as a jelly fish, Haeckel (1873) proposed that Noctiluca Suriray ex Lamarck should be included in the Cystoflagellata within the dinoflagellates. Based on detailed observations of the trophonts, Kofoid (1920) homologized the structures recognised in Noctiluca with the sulcus, cingulum, longitudinal and transverse flagella of the dinoflagellates, and since then, Noctiluca was classified within dinoflagellates as the type of the order Noctilucales. In current taxonomic schemes, dinoflagellates (Dinoflagellata) are divided into two subdivisions: Dinokaryota and Syndinea (Fensome et al. 1993). Syndinea comprises one single order, Syndiniales, of exclusively non-photosynthetic parasitic species that, among other features, lack most characters defining the typical nucleus of the Dinokaryota. The syndinean nucleus contains a low number (usually four to ten) of non-fibrillar and V-shaped chromosomes (Cachon 1964; Hollande 1974). The chromatin of Dinokaryota has fibrillar chromosomes (∼20-300) condensed throughout the cell cycle (Pfiester 1984; Rizzo 2003). Likewise, the diploid Noctiluca trophonts do not retain characters shared by typical dinoflagellates, such as a transverse flagellum and condensed chromosomes. In contrast, the haploid zoospores maintain primitive dinoflagellate-like characteristics including two grooves, slightly differentiated flagella with different lengths and paraxial rod, and condensed chromosomes (Afzelius 1963; Fukuda and Endoh 2006; Höhfeld and Melkonian 1995; Melkonian and Höhfeld 1988; Soyer, 1969, Soyer, 1970, Soyer, 1972; Zingmark 1970). Zingmark (1970) considered Noctiluca not to be a true dinoflagellate because its vegetative nucleus is of conventional eukaryotic type and not dinokaryotic. However, Fensome et al. (1993), based on the dinokaryotic nature of the gamete nucleus and the intergradational nature with other Noctilucales (such as Kofoidinium Pavillard), placed the noctilucoids in the class Noctiluciphyceae within the subdivision Dinokaryota (Fensome et al. 1993).

In the 1990s, the phylogenetic position of Noctiluca was re-evaluated using molecular information. The first phylogenetic analyses based on the large subunit (LSU) and small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequences suggested that Noctiluca represented a basal lineage within the dinoflagellates (Lenaers et al. 1991; Saunders et al. 1997). Recent studies based on other markers (light-emitting enzyme luciferase gene, editing density of mitochondrial cox1 mRNA and Spliced-Leader RNA trans-splicing groups, β-tubulin and heat shock protein 90 -Hsp90-) also suggested that Noctiluca might belong to an early diverging dinoflagellate lineage that diverged after that leading to Oxyrrhis Dujardin and before the core dinoflagellates, although the corresponding phylogenies were most often poorly supported (Fukuda and Endoh 2008; Liu and Hastings 2007; Zhang and Lin 2008). Similarly, in the SSU rDNA phylogeny, the most extended marker for protist phylogenetic and diversity studies, the placement of Noctiluca was unstable, its position likely influenced by the number of nucleotides used in the alignment (Saldarriaga et al. 2004). An analysis using diverse alveolate SSU rDNA sequences as outgroup suggested that Noctiluca occupies a basal position among dinoflagellates, while another analysis rooted using sequences only from Perkinsus Levine and Syndiniales placed Noctiluca within one of the clades of the order Gymnodiniales (Saldarriaga et al. 2004). The SSU rDNA phylogeny turned out to be too weak to place Noctiluca with confidence. Since the enrichment of taxonomic sampling is well known to improve the resolution of phylogenetic analyses, the sequencing of SSU rDNA from other noctilucoids might help to resolve the phylogenetic position of this group within the dinoflagellates.

In addition to Noctiluca, which is easily accessible from cultures and widespread in eutrophic coastal waters, other noctilucoids have a predominantly tropical to warm-temperate oceanic distribution (Cachon and Cachon, 1967, Cachon and Cachon, 1969; Gómez and Furuya, 2005, Gómez and Furuya, 2007. Most of the Noctilucales have been described from the NW Mediterranean and knowledge on their morphology and life cycle is almost completely restricted to the studies by Cachon and Cachon, 1967, Cachon and Cachon, 1969. More than 100 nucleotide sequences are publicly available for N. scintillans, but sequences from other noctilucoid protists are lacking. Spatulodinium pseudonoctiluca (Pouchet) Cachon et Cachon, the type of the family Kofoidiniaceae, was first named Gymnodinium pseudonoctiluca due to the intermediate morphological characters between Gymnodinium Stein and Noctiluca. Pouchet (1885) already noted that members of this taxon undergo a complex ontogenetic process from gymnodinioid or amphidinioid immature stages to tentacle-bearing noctilucoid trophonts and he showed that G. pseudonoctiluca is a single species with two different morphotypes. The immature morphotype has two differentiated flagella, including the ribbon-like transverse flagellum, and the cingulum and the sulcus, whereas the mature morphotype, which also keeps these dinoflagellate morphological features, has radiating contractile fibrils from the perinuclear region and a tentacle that resembles the one of Noctiluca. Other authors described the immature stages of Spatulodinium J. Cachon et M. Cachon as separate species (i.e., Gymnodinium conicum Kofoid et Swezy, G. fulgens Kofoid et Swezy, and G. lebouriae Pavillard). Pouchet’s observations were confirmed by Cachon and Cachon (1967) and more recent studies (Gómez and Souissi 2007; Konovalova and Selina 2002). Nevertheless, G. lebouriae and S. pseudonoctiluca often appear as a separate species in the literature (Hansen and Larsen 1992; Hoppenrath 2004). The family Leptodiscaceae is the least known among the Noctilucales due to their delicacy and warm-water oceanic distribution. Their cell bodies are strongly antero-posteriorly flattened with a bilateral symmetry or with equatorial wing-like expansions, being able to contract suddenly (Cachon and Cachon 1967; Cachon and Cachon-Enjumet, 1964, Cachon and Cachon-Enjumet, 1966).

The present study provides the first SSU rRNA gene sequences for representatives of the families Kofoidiniaceae and Leptodiscaceae. This allows us to test the monophyly of the noctilucoid dinoflagellates and to study the placement of Noctiluca in the SSU rDNA phylogeny, namely, to test whether the noctilucoid protists are an early diverging lineage or a recent lineage derived from typical dinokaryotes phylogenetically related to Gymnodiniales.

Section snippets

Observations of Spatulodinium

Despite one year of intensive sampling in the coast of Marseille, NW Mediterranean Sea, from October 2007 to September 2008, the records of Spatulodinium were very scarce. We observed only eight specimens on May 10-11th, which corresponded to Gymnodinium lebouriae, stage ‘D’ in the life cycle of S. pseudonoctiluca according to Cachon and Cachon (1967) (Fig. 1A-D). The sampling continued from October 2008 to July 2009 in the port of Banyuls sur Mer, NW Mediterranean Sea. The first specimens of

Discussion

Based on SSU rDNA phylogenetic analyses rooted using sequences from Perkinsus and Syndiniales as outgroup, Saldarriaga et al. (2004) found that Noctiluca branched close to the Amphidinium Claparède et Lachmann species within one of the clades of the order Gymnodiniales, suggesting a common gymnodinioid ancestor for the entire group. Saldarriaga et al. (2004, p. 97) reported that “the basal position of Noctiluca within the dinokaryotic dinoflagellates should be reexamined: the two main arguments

Methods

Collection of organisms: Mediterranean specimens were collected by slowly filtering surface seawater taken from the end of the pier (depth 3 m) of the Station Marine d’Endoume, Marseille (43°16′48″N, 5°20′57″E) from October 2007 to September 2008. A strainer with netting of 20, 40 or 60-μm mesh-size was used to collect the organisms and the filtered volume varied between 10 and 100 liters, according to the concentration of particles. The concentrated sample was examined in Utermöhl chambers at

Acknowledgements

This is a contribution to the project DIVERPLAN-MED supported by a post-doctoral grant to F.G. of the Ministerio Español de Educación y Ciencia #2007-0213. D.M. and P.L.G. acknowledge financial support from the French CNRS and the ANR Biodiversity program (ANR BDIV 07 004-02 `Aquaparadox´). We thank S. Souissi for laboratory facilities at the Station Marine de Wimereux, France, and A. Nowaczyk for the offshore ethanol samples. This is a contribution of the BOUM (Biogeochemistry from the

References (57)

  • J.F. Saldarriaga et al.

    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates

    Eur J Protistol

    (2004)
  • B.A. Afzelius

    The nucleus of Noctiluca scintillans. Aspects of nucleocytoplasmic exchanges and the formation of nuclear membranes

    J Cell Biol

    (1963)
  • M. Baker

    Employment for the Microscope.

    Dodsley

    (1753)
  • J. Cachon

    Contribution a l’étude des Péridiniens parasites. Cytologie, cycles évolutifs

    Ann Sci Nat

    (1964)
  • J. Cachon et al.

    Contribution a l’étude des Noctilucidae Saville-Kent, I. Les Kofoidininae Cachon J. et M. Évolution, morphologique et systématique

    Protistologica

    (1967)
  • J. Cachon et al.

    Contribution a l’étude des Noctilucidae Saville-Kent. Évolution, morphologique, cytologie, systématique. II. Les Leptodiscinae Cachon J. et M

    Protistologica

    (1969)
  • J. Cachon et al.

    Parasitic Dinoflagellates

  • J. Cachon et al.

    Leptospathium navicula nov. gen., nov. sp. et Leptophyllus dasypus nov. gen. sp., Péridiniens Noctilucidae (Hertwig) du plancton néritique de Villefranche-sur-Mer

    Bull Inst Océanogr Monaco

    (1964)
  • J. Cachon et al.

    Pomatodinium impatiens nov. gen. nov. sp. péridiniens Noctilucidae Kent

    Protistologica

    (1966)
  • E. Chatton

    Les Péridiniens parasites. Morphologie, reproduction, éthologie

    Arch Zool Exp Gén

    (1920)
  • N. Daugbjerg et al.

    Phylogeny of some of the major genera of dinoflagellates based on ultrastructure and partial LSU rDNA sequence data, including the erection of three new genera of unarmoured dinoflagellates

    Phycologia

    (2000)
  • R.C. Edgar

    MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2004)
  • R.A. Fensome et al.

    A Classification of Living and Fossil Dinoflagellates. Micropaleontology Special Publication Number 7, American Museum of Natural History

    (1993)
  • F. Gómez et al.

    The crustacean parasites Ellobiopsis Caullery, 1910 and Thalassomyces Niezabitowski, 1913 form a monophyletic divergent clade within the Alveolata

    Syst Parasitol

    (2009)
  • C. Greuet

    Complex Organelles

  • E. Haeckel

    Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte

    (1873)
  • G. Hansen et al.

    Dinoflagellater i Danske Farvande

  • G. Hansen et al.

    Flagellar apparatus and nuclear chambers of the green dinoflagellate Gymnodinium chlorophorum

    Phycol Res

    (2005)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Seasonal and spatial distribution of Noctilucoid dinoflagellates (Noctilucales, Dinophyceae) in the Southeastern Black Sea

      2020, Regional Studies in Marine Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among the Noctilucoids, Noctiluca scintillans (Macartney) Kofoid & Swezy, 1921 is a well-known species and an important component of the marine heterotrophic plankton and is widely disturbed from tropical to warm-temperate waters (e.g. Elbrächter and Qi, 1998; Harrison et al., 2011). Although N. scintillans has been well investigated because of its ubiquitous distribution and capacity to form red tides (Elbrächter and Qi, 1998), other Noctilucoids have been poorly reported (Cachon and Cachon, 1967; Larsen and Sournia, 1991; Gómez and Furuya, 2004; Gómez, 2010) due to difficulties on identification because of high morphological variability during their life cycle (Gómez et al., 2010; Gómez, 2010). The Black Sea is a strongly stratified ecosystem, it receives more freshwater by river runoff and precipitation than it loses by evaporation (BSC, 2007).

    • Citizen participation in monitoring phytoplankton seawater discolorations

      2020, Marine Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most of the red discolorations observed during the three years of the project implementation are linked to the massive presence of the protist Noctiluca scintillans. This species is generally considered as an aberrant heterotrophic dinoflagellate, having significant morphological and biological differences with typical dinoflagellates (diploidy, presence of tentacle, absence of condensed chromosomes) [13]. Noctiluca scintillans can feed upon a large variety of preys (diatoms, dinoflagellates, copepod eggs and small ciliates), but diatoms seem to be its preferred food source for proliferation [13].

    • What has happened to the “aquatic phycomycetes” (sensu Sparrow)? Part I: A brief historical perspective

      2018, Fungal Biology Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Class Dinophyceae contains both photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic species. The Phylum Perkinsozoa, Class Syndiniophyceae, Class Blastodiniphyceae and Class Noctiluciphyceae are groups of heterotrophic dinoflagellate protists which lack chloroplasts and have diverged into clades currently considered separate from the Class Dinophyceae (core dinoflagellates) (Gόmez et al., 2010; Bachvaroff et al., 2014). However some heterotrophic species, such as Noctiluca scintillans, can become mixotrophic in the presence of a photosynthetic endosymbiont (Gomes et al., 2014).

    • Applicability of massively parallel sequencing on monitoring harmful algae at Varna Bay in the Black Sea

      2017, Harmful Algae
      Citation Excerpt :

      Unfortunately, contrary to the new records, some common potentially toxic genera in Bulgarian Black Sea remained undetermined at the species level in the sampling set (Table S1). Thus, the acquired metagenetic data clearly demonstrated the MPS problems of poor resolution for the 18S rRNA gene (V4-5) and length restriction problem for species identification in many genera, e.g., Azadinium, Dinophysis, Gymnodinium, Karenia, Prorocentrum, Pseudo-nitzschia, and Skeletonema, as shown by van der Auwera and de Wachter (1998), Edvardsen et al. (2003), Gómez et al. (2010), Tanabe et al. (2015), and Nagai et al. (2016c). In most eukaryotic species, the large subunit of the ribosomal RNA gene (LSU) and the ITS regions are generally more variable than the 18S rRNA gene.

    • Plastid Complexity in Dinoflagellates: A Picture of Gains, Losses, Replacements and Revisions

      2017, Advances in Botanical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      A clearer picture has also formed of the deep-branching dinoflagellate lineages and their relationships to the nearest nondinoflagellate neighbours (Janouškovec et al., 2015). Spathulodinium of the Noctilucales represents the deepest branching photosynthetic dinoflagellate (Gómez, Moreira, & López-García, 2010; Janouškovec et al., 2017), and beneath that branches the chiefly parasitic Syndiniales. Oxyrrhis is the deepest ‘true’ dinoflagellate, and the nearest major group to dinoflagellates are the Perkinsozoa which share some traits characteristic of dinoflagellates but also lacks many (Zhang, Campbell, Sturm, Dungan, & Lin, 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text