HIV-1 protecting CCR5-Δ32 allele in medieval Poland
Introduction
Among many receptor molecules, C–C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) arouse particular interest, as it was proven that, when defective, it confers resistance to most of HIV-1 strains (Liu et al., 1996, Samson et al., 1996, Dean et al., 1996). Most of the many mutations in CCR5 gene, located in chromosome 3, region p21.3, are function altering, which may suggest their adaptive role in response to past selective pressures (Ansari-Lari et al., 1997, Carrington et al., 1997). A 32 base pair deletion within the second extracellular loop makes the protein shorter and prevents it from fusing with the cell membrane, which results in lack of the receptor expression on the surface of leukocytes (Blanpain et al., 2002). Homozygous carriers of CCR5-Δ32 exhibit no CCR5, whereas in heterozygotes, the amount of the receptor is on average lower. Because CCR5 is required for HIV-1 entry into leukocytes, this makes the first group nearly completely resistant to HIV-1 infection and in the latter, progression towards AIDS is slower, CD4+ T cells counts higher and mortality rate lower (Dean et al., 1996, Rappaport et al., 1997, Zimmerman et al., 1997, Philpott et al., 2003). There is no known medical condition or an apparent impairment of body function that results from absence or reduced number of CCR5 (Liu et al., 1996, Zimmerman et al., 1997), which may be explained by the fact that there are a lot of other chemokine receptors of the kind (Premack and Schall, 1996, Carrington et al., 1997). The mutation is present almost exclusively in Europe and neighbouring areas of Asia and Mediterranean. Its mean frequency in the continent is around 10% and the distribution of the allele forms a north to south cline, with lowest frequency in Sardinia (4%) and highest in Finland (15.8%) (Libert et al., 1998). Its trace presence in other parts of the world results most probably from migrations and settlement of European descent. For instance, CCR5-Δ32 has not been found in indigenous Mexican populations but its frequency in Hispanic Mexicans is approximately 4.4% (in Spain it is present in 8% of the population) (Salas-Alanis et al., 1999). The mutation is absent in indigenous populations of Asian and Pacific islands (Lu et al., 1999), South America (Leboute et al., 1999) and Africa (Samson et al., 1996). Although carriers of the mutation have been found in non-Caucasian populations, e.g. Indian (Husain et al., 1998) and Chinese (Zhang et al., 2002), it might result from gene inflow to ancestral populations (Martinson et al., 1997).
Because of the characteristic distribution of the mutation carrying allele in Europe and the whole world, there are two main theories concerning its place of origin. Libert et al. (1998) suggested, it first appeared in North-Eastern Europe and Balanovsky et al. (2005) seek its roots in a Uralic population. Alternatively, the mutation event may have taken place in a Scandinavian population and was disseminated in 8–10th centuries by Vikings (Lucotte and Mercier, 1998, Lucotte and Dieterlen, 2003). The age of the mutation was first estimated (using haplotype analysis and coalescence theory) by Stephens et al. (1998) to be approximately 700 years. The authors also suggested that to reach the present-day frequency, the allele must have been subjected to strong selective pressure imposed by a factor that operated only in Europe. It would have given an advantage of some kind to its carriers and thus quickly rose in frequency. The most obvious candidate seemed to be the Black Death, the disease that claimed millions during the last centuries in the continent. The bubonic plague of 14th century appeared as an especially suitable candidate for a selective factor since mortality rate was the highest among all epidemics (McEvedy, 1988), the pandemic route was similar to the contemporary gradient of CCR5-Δ32 in Europe, Yersinia pestis (the plague agent) infects CCR5 carrying macrophages and, above all, because of the time of the outbreak, which matched the calculations (Stephens et al., 1998). However, a different set of chromosome markers used by Libert et al. (1998) allowed the group to estimate the time of the allele appearance to be between 3400 and 1400 years before present. Still, they argue, the allele had a single origin and it was under a selective pressure. Plenty of pathogens were speculated to be involved in selecting CCR5-Δ32. These include: Shigella, Salmonella, Mycobacterium (which all target macrophages) (Stephens et al., 1998) and Variola major (the smallpox virus)—which infects cells in a similar manner as HIV-1 does and claimed a huge number of deaths cumulatively throughout the last millennium (Klitz et al., 2001, Galvani and Slatkin, 2003). Other suspected diseases were: viral haemorrhagic fever, which may have been responsible for the deadliest epidemics (Duncan and Scott, 2005) and anthrax (Winkler et al., 2004). Alternatively, the frequency of CCR5-Δ32 may have been influenced by some climatic or geographical factors (Limborska et al., 2002, Balanovsky et al., 2005).
However, new reports appear that question the initial assumption regarding the allele's age and discuss the need of any selection to account for the contemporary frequency and distribution of CCR5-Δ32. In order to add to the data and discussion on origin, dispersal and possible impact of the historically most deadly infectious diseases on the frequency of the allele, we decided to take advantage of ancient DNA (aDNA) methodology and search for the mutation in a medieval population that predates the biggest epidemics of 14th and 17th centuries. Comparison of medieval frequency of the allele with present-day values would shed light on the putative influence of pandemics on CCR5-Δ32 presence in Europe. Had the mutation been selected by any of the pathogens plaguing the European population during the last millennium, its frequency would have been much lower in the middle ages. Poland appears to be a very suitable region for such comparison as the population has always been uniform with very little ethnic minorities and no major migration or immigrant influx, which is reflected for example in the language, that is deprived of any major variability throughout the whole country. This ensures relative continuity between the medieval and contemporary populations.
Section snippets
Materials
Ancient DNA was isolated from skeletal remains of individuals excavated at Polish archaeological sites: Stary Brześć Kujawski 4 (central Poland)—dated to 12–14th century (121 individuals), Dziekanowice (central Poland)—dated to 11–12th century (102 individuals), Daniłowo (eastern Poland)—dated to 11–13th century (23 individuals), Cedynia (western Poland)—dated to 12–14th century (21 individuals) and Gdańsk (northern Poland)—dated to 14th century (9 individuals).
Only teeth without any visible
Results
We typed 89 individuals from 5 sites and found the frequency of CCR5-Δ32 to be 5.06%. The allele was found in four out of five locations and its frequency at the two most numerously represented burial sites (Stary Brześć Kujawski 4 and Dziekanowice) was similar (5.42% and 4.40%), which suggest the results are consistent and do not result from local accumulation of the mutated allele. The number of individuals sampled at the remaining three sites (Daniłowo, Cedynia and Gdańsk) was not sufficient
Discussion
Similarly to our previous preliminary results (Witas and Zawicki, 2006), we found the frequency of CCR5-Δ32 in medieval Poland to be roughly half of today's value (5.06% versus 10.26%) and within the range characteristic of contemporary European populations. The limited number of samples, from which aDNA could be retrieved, allowed us to calculate frequency of CCR5-Δ32 at only two medieval sites. However, the fact that we found the mutated allele in four locations (with similar frequencies at
Acknowledgements
The authors cordially thank Prof. E. Żądzińska, Prof. J. Gładykowska-Rzeczycka, Prof. B. Jerszyńska, J. Wrzesiński and A. Wrzesińska for the dated and carefully described archaeological material used in the study. Project (no. 502-18-556) supported by Medical University of Łódź.
References (48)
- et al.
Novel alleles of the chemokine-receptor gene CCR5
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
(1997) - et al.
The evolutionary history of the CCR5-Delta32 HIV-resistance mutation
Microbes Infect.
(2005) - et al.
“Ground truth” for selection on CCR5-Delta32
Trends Genet.
(2006) - et al.
First report of a healthy Indian heterozygous for delta 32 mutant of HIV-1 co-receptor-CCR5 gene
Gene
(1998) - et al.
Evolution of the CCR5 Delta32 mutation based on haplotype variation in Jewish and Northern European population samples
Hum. Immunol.
(2001) - et al.
Homozygous defect in HIV-1 coreceptor accounts for resistance of some multiply-exposed individuals to HIV-1 infection
Cell
(1996) - et al.
Genotype and allele frequency of a 32-base pair deletion mutation in the CCR5 gene in various ethnic groups: absence of mutation among Asians and Pacific Islanders
Int. J. Infect. Dis.
(1999) - et al.
More about the Viking hypothesis of origin of the delta32 mutation in the CCR5 gene conferring resistance to HIV-1 infection
Infect. Genet. Evol.
(2003) - et al.
32 bp CCR-5 gene deletion and resistance to fast progression in HIV-1 infected heterozygotes
Lancet
(1997) - et al.
Dating the origin of the CCR5-Delta32 AIDS-resistance allele by the coalescence of haplotypes
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
(1998)