Review
The role of high-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failurePapel de la oxigenoterapia de alto flujo en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2015.05.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) represents one of the most common causes of intensive care unit admission and oxygen therapy remains the first-line therapy in the management of these patients. In recent years, high-flow oxygen via nasal cannula has been described as a useful alternative to conventional oxygen therapy in patients with ARF. High-flow oxygen via nasal cannula rapidly alleviates symptoms of ARF and improves oxygenation by several mechanisms, including dead space washout, reduction in oxygen dilution and inspiratory nasopharyngeal resistance, a moderate positive airway pressure effect that may generate alveolar recruitment and an overall greater tolerance and comfort with the interface and the heated and humidified inspired gases. However, the experience in adults is still limited and there are no clinical guidelines to establish recommendations for their use. This article aims to review the existing evidence on the use of high-flow oxygen via nasal cannula in adults with ARF and its possible applications, advantages and limitations.

Resumen

La insuficiencia respiratoria aguda supone una de las causas más frecuentes de ingreso en los servicios de Medicina Intensiva y la oxigenoterapia sigue constituyendo una terapéutica de primera línea en el manejo de estos pacientes. En los últimos años, la oxigenoterapia de alto flujo ha sido descrita como una alternativa útil a la oxigenoterapia convencional en los pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. La oxigenoterapia de alto flujo permite administrar un flujo de gas totalmente acondicionado hasta a 60 L/min mediante cánulas nasales, obteniendo una rápida mejoría de los síntomas debido a diferentes mecanismos como, por ejemplo, una reducción de la resistencia de la vía aérea superior, cambios en el volumen circulante y la generación de cierto grado de presión positiva. Además, todo ello se consigue junto con una mejor tolerancia y comodidad por parte del paciente. Sin embargo, la experiencia en adultos es todavía limitada y no existen guías clínicas que establezcan recomendaciones para su uso. En este artículo se pretende revisar la evidencia existente sobre el uso de oxigenoterapia de alto flujo en pacientes adultos con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda, así como sus posibles aplicaciones, ventajas y limitaciones.

Introduction

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a frequent cause of admission to Intensive Care,1 and oxygen therapy undoubtedly remains one of its first-line management options.2 Under conditions of ARF, oxygen can be administered on an invasive or noninvasive basis. However, whenever possible, we should try to avoid invasive ventilation support.

Noninvasive oxygen therapy can be administered in different ways, for example, through an oronasal mask or using nasal cannulas. However, noninvasive oxygen therapy has a number of limiting factors that condition its efficacy and therefore the correction of hypoxemia and the clinical manifestations associated to ARF. The main limiting factors are tolerance of the application system on one hand, and limitation of the administered oxygen flow on the other. The latter is generally limited to 15 l/min,3 and the flow is normally administered under conditions that do not coincide with the ideal temperature and humidity specifications (37 °C and 100% relative humidity). This limitation in administered flow implies dilution of the administered oxygen with room air, conditioned by the patient peak inspiratory flow. In this regard, the greater the peak inspiratory flow, the greater the dilution–thereby lowering the real fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) administered to the patient.2, 4 This situation has little impact upon patients with mild hypoxemia, though in individuals with severe ARF and important hypoxemia with peak inspiratory flows of >30 l/min, conventional oxygen therapy may not suffice to correct ARF. An alternative that would overcome these limitations of conventional oxygen therapy is the use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) systems–though the main problem with these systems is patient discomfort and poor tolerance of the interfaces.5

A recently introduced alternative is high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT),6 which allows us to administer a gas flow of up to 60 l/min using silicone nasal cannulas, with ideal conditions of administered gas temperature and humidity (i.e., 37 °C and 100% relative humidity). Until a few years ago, this technique had been used mainly in newborn infants.7, 8, 9 However, its use in adult patients has increased exponentially in recent years.10

The use of HFOT affords better oxygenation through a series of different mechanisms such as reduced dilution of the administered oxygen with room air,11, 12 dead space washout,12, 13, 14 increased tidal volume15, 16 and the generation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)16, 17, 18, 19. The technique could also offer benefits at hemodynamic level,20 increase patient physical exertion capacity and wellbeing,5 and improve mucociliary transport thanks to the active humidification of the administered gas.21, 22

The aim of the present study is to offer an update on the possible clinical applications of HFOT, examining the mechanisms whereby it may prove useful in adults with ARF, identifying the patients in which it may be most useful, and establishing the way in which the technique should be used.

Section snippets

Equipment

The administration of HFOT requires four elements: (1) a patient interface; (2) a high-flow administration system allowing control of the administered flow and FiO2; (3) a humidifying-warming system; and (4) non-condensing tubing (Fig. 1).

Main clinical indications

As a result of the different mechanisms of action described above, HFOT has a broad range of clinical indications.38 The main areas in which there is evidence for use of the technique are specified below. In addition, Table 1 summarizes these indications, analyzing the main studies published in the literature and the existing levels of evidence.

Starting HFOT

Table 2 summarizes the gas flows used in the different studies. In general, an initial flow of 30–40 l/min could be used. As regards FiO2, the administered level should allow us to achieve the desired arterial oxygen saturation values. On the other hand, it is important to make sure that the system reaches the appropriate temperature (37 °C) for administration of the gas.

Weaning from the system

It is difficult to establish guidelines for weaning from HFOT and its replacement by conventional oxygen therapy. However, it would seem reasonable to first lower FiO2 and then the flow.6 An acceptable recommendation could be maintenance of the administered flow until correct oxygenation is achieved with FiO2 < 0.5. The reduction in flow should be slow (5 l/min every 6–8 h). Lastly, once correct oxygenation has been achieved with ≤20 l/min and FiO2 < 0.5, we could consider switching from HFOT to

Contraindications and complications

No important adverse effects have been described in relation to the use of HFOT. Active humidification systems allow the administration of fully conditioned gas, thereby minimizing the side effects at nasopharyngeal level. In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the use of high oxygen concentrations can cause respiratory acidosis due to the reduction of respiratory frequency and ventilation-perfusion alterations.57

A number of high-flow systems are available. The ideal

Conclusions

In sum, HFOT is a new oxygen therapy option allowing the administration of fully conditioned warmed and humidified gas at very high flow rates–improving patient oxygenation and wellbeing, and minimizing the adverse effects at nasopharyngeal level. Based on the current body of evidence, HFOT is an attractive and useful option in patients with ARF, since it improves oxygenation, lessens respiratory work, and affords improved patient wellbeing. However, further studies are needed to determine its

Conflict of interest

Fisher & Paykel collaborates with the Institut Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM) through a post-doctorate research grant.

References (57)

  • N.A. Dewan et al.

    Effect of low flow and high flow oxygen delivery on exercise tolerance and sensation of dyspnea. A study comparing the transtracheal catheter and nasal prongs

    Chest

    (1994)
  • J.M. Carratalá Perales et al.

    High-flow therapy via nasal cannula in acute heart failure

    Rev Esp Cardiol

    (2011)
  • D. Sotello et al.

    High-flow nasal cannula oxygen in adult patients: a narrative review

    Am J Med Sci

    (2015)
  • J. Rello et al.

    High-flow nasal therapy in adults with severe acute respiratory infection: a cohort study in patients with 2009 influenza A/H1N1v

    J Crit Care

    (2012)
  • R. Parke et al.

    Open-label, phase II study of routine high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in cardiac surgical patients

    Br J Anaesth

    (2013)
  • C. Lomas et al.

    Fibroscopy in patients with hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency: utility of the high-flow nasal cannula

    Respir Med CME

    (2009)
  • D.A. Mahler et al.

    American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the management of dyspnea in patients with advanced lung or heart disease

    Chest

    (2010)
  • T.J. Kallstrom et al.

    AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: oxygen therapy for adults in the acute care facility—2002 revision & update

    Respir Care

    (2002)
  • B.R. O’Driscoll et al.

    BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients

    Thorax

    (2008)
  • J.D. Ricard et al.

    Humidification during oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation: do we need some and how much?

    Intensive Care Med

    (2009)
  • O. Roca et al.

    High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure

    Respir Care

    (2010)
  • J.R. Masclans et al.

    High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure

    Clin Pulm Med

    (2012)
  • D. Wilkinson et al.

    High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2011)
  • S. Mayfield et al.

    High-flow nasal cannula therapy for respiratory support in children

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2014)
  • S. Beggs et al.

    High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2014)
  • J.H. Lee et al.

    Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature

    Intensive Care Med

    (2013)
  • R.B. Wettstein et al.

    Delivered oxygen concentrations using low-flow and high-flow nasal cannulas

    Respir Care

    (2005)
  • J. Lund et al.

    Nasal catheters versus Hudson face mask in oxygen therapy

    Ugeskr Laeger

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    Please cite this article as: Masclans JR, Pérez-Terán P, Roca O. Papel de la oxigenoterapia de alto flujo en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Med Intensiva. 2015;39:505–515.

    View full text