Obligate vertebrate scavengers must be large soaring fliers
Introduction
Meat-eating animals can obtain a meal either by killing their own food, or scavenging it from a carcass. Many natural ecosystems have large numbers of animals dying from disease, malnutrition or accidents that provide an easy source of meat (Houston, 1979). Despite this, obligate scavengers are very rare. Among extant vertebrates, only vultures have a diet based almost exclusively on carrion (Houston, 2001), although many other predatory birds, reptiles and mammals are opportunist scavengers. Two quite separate lineages of birds (Cathartidae and Accipitridae) have independently evolved this obligate scavenging lifestyle. Here we ask whether we can identify factors that make flying animals more efficient obligate scavengers than terrestrial ones, and consider the selective pressures acting on them. The 23 species of extant vultures are generally characterized by a large body size in comparison to other groups of birds, and by a common dependence on soaring on air currents as an alternative to flapping flight.
It has frequently been argued that soaring should be attractive to an obligate scavenger because this provides a low cost means of travel (e.g. Bertram, 1979; Houston (1979), Houston (2001)). However, this argument does not consider the negative consequences of gliding being a relatively slow form of travel, restricting the rate at which area can be searched. In order to develop the argument more fully, verbal reasoning needs to be supported by quantitative calculation. Recently, we introduced a mathematical model of energy balance in an obligate scavenger, and used this to evaluate the feasibility of obligate scavenging among extinct dinosaurs (Ruxton and Houston, 2003). Here, we develop this model for evaluation of the energetic consequences of obligate scavenging among birds that fly by either flapping and soaring flight. This will allow us to quantify the energetics of obligate scavenging for these two broad categories of flight, and to explore the consequences of size of the bird for the feasibility of scavenging in a general context.
We will also extend the model to consider hypothetical mammalian and reptilian scavengers and compare these with avian ones. Although obligate scavenging in dinosaurs (and other extinct vertebrates) has often been postulated (see references in Ruxton and Houston, 2003), there has been little attempt to quantify the energetic feasibility of obligate scavenging for terrestrial animals. As with flapping and soaring birds, we would expect a trade-off between endothermy and ectothermy: endotherms have higher metabolic costs but this buys greater endurance (and so higher rates of searching). Hence, another aim of this project will be to quantify consequences of this trade-off and explore how it is affected by animal size. Finally, we will be able to compare the relative energetic feasibilities of scavenging in aerial and terrestrial taxa.
Section snippets
Methods
Our hypothesis is that the key constraint for scavengers is their ability to find food items. This can be contrasted with predators, where capturing rather than discovering prey is the main constraint, and herbivores, where processing consumed food is often the key restriction on energy gain rate. We assume that the scavenger spends a constant fraction (α) of its time searching for food items that are uniformly distributed at density (f). If, when active, the scavenger searches out an area at a
Results
Initially, we make the simplistic assumption that carrion is uniformly distributed in very small packages and Fig. 1 shows clearly that for all four life history strategies the minimum detection distance (dmin) needed for energy balance increases with body size. For any given mass (M), a soaring bird has a lower value of dmin than a flapping bird, which in turn has a lower value of dmin than the two terrestrial life history strategies. dmin is lower for reptiles than for mammals for M values
Discussion
Fig. 1 showed that for reptiles, birds and mammals dmin increased as the body mass increased, which means that it was becoming harder to balance the energy budget by obligate scavenging. This was due to increases in both travel costs and resting metabolic rate, both of which rose faster with body size than did the speed of movement. So larger scavengers can only exist if, with increasing mass, their ability to locate food increases faster than their increased food demands. However, Fig. 1 was
References (25)
Food for the deep seautilization, dispersal and flux of nekton falls at the Santa Catalina Basic floor
Deep-Sea Res.
(1985)When is migration worthwhile for mammals that walk, swim or fly
J. Avian Biol.
(1998)The energetics of reptilian activity
- et al.
Endothermy and activity in vertebrates
Science
(1979) Serengeti predators and their social systems
Size, Function, and Life History
(1996)Breathing live into Tyrannosaurus rex
Sci. Am.
(1999)Speculations about the carrion-locating ability of Tyrannosaurs
Hist. Biol.
(1994)- Fischer, A.B., 1969. Laboratory experiments on and open-country observations of the visual acuity and behaviour of...
Migration by soaring or flapping flight in birdsthe relative importance of energy cost and speed
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B
(1993)
Food searching behaviour in griffon vultures
Afr. J. Ecol.
Ecological isolation of African scavenging birds
Ardea
Cited by (201)
Fine-scale collision risk mapping and validation with long-term mortality data reveal current and future wind energy development impact on sensitive species
2024, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewPlasma cholinesterase activity: A benchmark for rapid detection of pesticide poisoning in an avian scavenger
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentAllosaurus was predominantly a scavenger
2023, Ecological ModellingWas Allosaurus really predominantly a scavenger?
2023, Ecological Modelling