Effect of Flap Mutations on Structure of HIV-1 Protease and Inhibition by Saquinavir and Darunavir

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.062Get rights and content

Abstract

HIV-1 (human immunodeficiency virus type 1) protease (PR) and its mutants are important antiviral drug targets. The PR flap region is critical for binding substrates or inhibitors and catalytic activity. Hence, mutations of flap residues frequently contribute to reduced susceptibility to PR inhibitors in drug-resistant HIV. Structural and kinetic analyses were used to investigate the role of flap residues Gly48, Ile50, and Ile54 in the development of drug resistance. The crystal structures of flap mutants PRI50V (PR with I50V mutation), PRI54V (PR with I54V mutation), and PRI54M (PR with I54M mutation) complexed with saquinavir (SQV) as well as PRG48V (PR with G48V mutation), PRI54V, and PRI54M complexed with darunavir (DRV) were determined at resolutions of 1.05–1.40 Å. The PR mutants showed changes in flap conformation, interactions with adjacent residues, inhibitor binding, and the conformation of the 80s loop relative to the wild-type PR. The PR contacts with DRV were closer in PRG48V–DRV than in the wild-type PR–DRV, whereas they were longer in PRI54M–DRV. The relative inhibition of PRI54V and that of PRI54M were similar for SQV and DRV. PRG48V was about twofold less susceptible to SQV than to DRV, whereas the opposite was observed for PRI50V. The observed inhibition was in agreement with the association of G48V and I50V with clinical resistance to SQV and DRV, respectively. This analysis of structural and kinetic effects of the mutants will assist in the development of more effective inhibitors for drug-resistant HIV.

Introduction

HIV-1 (human immunodeficiency virus type 1) protease (PR) is an effective drug target for antiviral inhibitors. Each subunit of the active PR homodimer has a glycine-rich region, including residues Lys45-Met-Ile-Gly-Gly-Ile-Gly-Gly-Phe-Ile-Lys55, termed the “flap,” which folds into two antiparallel β strands. The flexible flaps participate in the binding of a substrate or an inhibitor in the active site cavity of PR.1, 2, 3 The importance of residues in the flap for PR activity has been characterized through large-scale mutagenesis.4 The residues Met46, Phe53, and Lys55 are the most tolerant of substitutions; Ile47, Ile50, Ile54, and Val56 tolerate a few conservative substitutions only; and Gly48, Gly49, Gly51, and Gly52 are the most sensitive to mutation. Therefore, mutations in the flap residues may alter the enzyme activity, conformation, and flexibility of the flap. Mutations in flap residues 46, 47, 48, 50, 53, and 54 are frequently observed in drug-resistant mutants of HIV and show various levels of reduced drug susceptibility to different PR inhibitors (PIs).5, 6 Altered flap conformations have been reported for PR and its mutants in the unliganded form7, 8, 9 or with bound peptide.10 Previously, we analyzed the structures, activities, inhibition, and stability of PR variants with the single substitutions of flap residues M46L, G48V, I50V, and F53L.8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 These studies used PR from HIV-1 subtype B, which forms ∼ 10% of global infections with HIV-1 group M as compared with ∼ 50% for subtype C.16 Recently, the PRs from subtypes C and F were analyzed.17, 18 These subtypes contain 8–10 polymorphic substitutions in the sequence outside of the flaps and inhibitor binding site, which can influence catalytic activity and inhibition. The PR structures and interactions with inhibitors were very similar to those of the subtype B PR, with larger structural variations in surface residues 34–42 for the subtype F PR and surface residues 65–69 for the subtype C PR.

Saquinavir (SQV) was the first PI to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1995, and it is still widely used in AIDS therapy, along with nine other inhibitors. The latest PI, darunavir (DRV, previously known as TMC114), a chemical derivative of the PI amprenavir, was approved in 2006 for salvage therapy and is extremely potent against the wild-type PR and most drug-resistant mutants in vitro and in vivo.11, 19, 20, 21 DRV boosted with ritonavir is recommended for treatment-experienced patients who respond poorly to other PIs. SQV was designed to target the wild-type PR, and its chemical structure contains a number of peptidic main chain groups mimicking a natural substrate of PR as shown in Fig. 1a.22 In contrast, DRV was designed to be less peptidic while introducing more hydrogen bond interactions with the main chain atoms of PR in order to maintain its effectiveness on PR variants.20, 23

In this study, PR variants with the individual flap mutations G48V, I50V, I54V, and I54M were analyzed to gain insight into their role in the development of drug resistance. G48V is one of the primary drug-resistant mutations selected during treatment with SQV.24, 25 I50V arises in treatment with amprenavir and confers resistance to DRV.5 Mutations of I54M and I54V are commonly observed during therapy with multiple PIs.5, 26, 27, 28 Several mutations of Ile54 are present in isolates with reduced susceptibility to SQV. Mutations I54M and I54L are frequent in clinical isolates resistant to DRV.29 Moreover, Met was the most frequently identified substitution of residue 54 after treatment with amprenavir, which is chemically related to DRV.28 Residue 50 lies at the tip of the PR flap, whereas residues 48 and 54 are located on opposite β strands of the flap (Fig. 1b). Previously, the crystal structure of the double-mutant G48V/L90M with SQV was analyzed,30 and we reported the structure of PRI50V (PR with I50V mutation) with DRV.11 Here, the crystal structures of flap mutants PRG48V (PR with G48V mutation), PRI50V, PRI54V (PR with I54V mutation), and PRI54M (PR with I54M mutation) were solved in complexes with SQV and DRV. Comparison of the mutant and wild-type structures revealed changes in the flap conformation, interactions between flap residues from the two PR subunits, inhibitor binding, and conformation of residues 78–82 (the 80s loop). The kinetic data are discussed in relation to the structural changes. This analysis confirmed the important roles of residues in the flaps and enhanced our understanding of the drug-resistant mechanisms used by the flap mutants.

Section snippets

Kinetics

The wild-type HIV-1 PR in these studies contains mutations Q7K, L33I, and L63I to diminish autoproteolysis as well as C67A and C95A to prevent cysteine–thiol oxidation, and it showed kinetic parameters, stability, and dimer dissociation almost identical with those in the unmutated wild-type PR.31 Kinetic parameters were measured for the resistant mutants and the wild-type PR using the fluorescence substrate based on the p2-NC cleavage site of HIV-1 (Table 1). The mutants PRG48V, PRI50V, and PR

Preparation of HIV-1 PR mutants

The optimized HIV-1 PR clone with mutations Q7K, L33I, and L63I to diminish the autoproteolysis of the PR as well as mutations C67A and C95A to prevent cysteine–thiol oxidation was used as the initial template for adding drug-resistant mutations.31 This optimized PR had kinetic parameters and stability almost identical with those in the mature PR (GenBank accession code HIVHXB2CG).31 Plasmid DNA (pET11a, Novagen) encoding PR was utilized to construct mutant PR with the use of a QuickChange

Acknowledgements

The research was supported in part by the Georgia State University Molecular Basis of Disease Program, the Georgia Research Alliance, the Georgia Cancer Coalition, and the National Institutes of Health through grants GM062920 and GM053386. We thank the staff at the SER-CAT beamline at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, for providing assistance during X-ray data collection. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S.

References (47)

  • G.M. Sheldrick et al.

    SHELXL: high-resolution refinement

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1997)
  • R.M. Esnouf

    An extensively modified version of MolScript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capabilities

    J. Mol. Graphics Modell.

    (1997)
  • M. Miller et al.

    Structure of complex of synthetic HIV-1 protease with a substrate-based inhibitor at 2.3 Å resolution

    Science

    (1989)
  • R. Ishima et al.

    Flap opening and dimer-interface flexibility in the free and inhibitor-bound HIV protease

    Structure

    (1999)
  • W. Shao et al.

    Sequence requirements of the HIV-1 protease flap region determined by saturation mutagenesis and kinetic analysis of flap mutants

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (1997)
  • R.W. Shafer

    Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.

    (2002)
  • R.W. Shafer et al.

    HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase mutations for drug resistance surveillance

    AIDS

    (2007)
  • H. Heaslet et al.

    Conformational flexibility in the flap domains of ligand-free HIV protease

    Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr.

    (2007)
  • B.C. Logsdon et al.

    Crystal structures of a multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease reveal an expanded active-site cavity

    J. Virol.

    (2004)
  • M. Prabu-Jeyabalan et al.

    Mechanism of substrate recognition by drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease variants revealed by a novel structural intermediate

    J. Virol.

    (2006)
  • A.Y. Kovalevsky et al.

    Effectiveness of nonpeptide clinical inhibitor TMC-114 on HIV-1 protease with highly drug resistant mutations D30N, I50V, and L90M

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2006)
  • B. Mahalingam et al.

    Structural and kinetic analysis of drug resistant mutants of HIV-1 protease

    Eur. J. Biochem.

    (1999)
  • Y.F. Wang et al.

    Potent new antiviral compound shows similar inhibition and structural interactions with drug resistant mutants and wild type HIV-1 protease

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (71)

    • Structural studies of antiviral inhibitor with HIV-1 protease bearing drug resistant substitutions of V32I, I47V and V82I

      2019, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      PRTri mutant had kcat of 299 ± 48 μM/min and Km of 72 ± 17.7 μM. The catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of 4.2 μM−1 min−1 is similar to that value of 6.5 μM−1 min−1 for wild type enzyme at 26 °C [34]. The measured Ki values were 31.4 ± 3.9 nM for compound 1, 38.4 ± 1.2 nM for compound 2, 16.7 ± 0.8 nM for compound 3, and 39.5 ± 6.1 nM for compound 4.

    • Conformations of the HIV-1 protease: A crystal structure data set analysis

      2017, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Proteins and Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, the fact that these preferential localization can be observed also considering only the HQ data set suggests that the possibility that we are dealing with overfitting artifacts is rather remote. A series of molecular dynamics and experimental studies have shown that some mutations reduce the flexibility and increase the stability of the HIV-1 protease [67–69]. These mutations often, but not exclusively, affect the flap region.

    • Evolution of inhibitor-resistant natural mutant forms of HIV-1 protease probed by pre-steady state kinetic analysis

      2017, Biochimie
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been shown according to PR-darunavir cocrystallization data that one molecule of darunavir can be captured not only in the active site of PR, but also in FLAP region [7] or on the hydrophobic interface surface. In that study [7] darunavir showed dual inhibition potency via a competitive–noncompetitive mechanism. These properties may determine extremely low KI for the majority of PR variants and the outstanding ability of darunavir to block PR activity almost completely.

    • Studies on HIV-1 protease and its inhibitors

      2017, Viral Proteases and Their Inhibitors
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present addresses: F. Liu, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. A.Y. Kovalevsky, Bioscience Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

    View full text