A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adults with chronic pain: Outcome domains, design quality, and efficacy
Introduction
Chronic pain is a major problem with estimated prevalence rates around 10–30% of the adult population (Reid et al., 2011). Chronic pain can have serious implications for patients׳ general health, everyday functioning, and quality of life, and incurs significant economic impacts, in healthcare use and time off from work (Reid et al., 2011). Medical treatments, including the use of analgesics, surgical interventions, spinal cord stimulators and implantable drug delivery systems have limited success in reducing chronic pain, and some can be costly (Turk & Burwinkle, 2005). On the other hand psychological interventions can have beneficial effects for people with chronic pain, particularly on their daily functioning and health related quality of life (Hoffman, Papas, Chatkoff, & Kerns, 2007).
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT; Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999) is a rapidly developing psychological treatment approach applicable to a wide range of physical and mental health issues, including chronic pain (McCracken and Morley, 2014, McCracken and Vowles, 2014). The psychological model on which ACT is based is called the psychological flexibility model (Hayes et al., 2006, McCracken and Morley, 2014, McCracken and Vowles, 2014). There are six core processes involved in psychological flexibility: acceptance, cognitive defusion, present-focused attention, self-as-context, values, and committed action. These can also be summarized as openness, awareness, and engagement (Hayes, Villatte, Levin, & Hildebrandt, 2011). ACT is different from traditional CBT because, rather than focusing on change in the content of patients׳ maladaptive thoughts and beliefs, ACT uses predominantly acceptance, mindfulness, and activation methods, to change their impact. Hence, the strategic focus within ACT in pain management is not to reduce patients׳ pain, negative automatic thoughts, or uncomfortable emotions, but to improve daily functioning by building more successful patterns of behavioral performance (outcome) explicitly through enhanced psychological flexibility (process).
Previous systematic reviews have provided support for the efficacy and effectiveness of ACT across a range of conditions and via different methods of delivery, including group therapy and self-help (Cavanagh et al., 2014, Ost, 2008, Powers et al., 2009, Ruiz, 2010, Ruiz, 2012). Whilst there has been some dispute over whether ACT is more effective than other active treatments, it has been suggested that further RCTs making such comparisons would be needed (Levin and Hayes, 2009, Powers and Emmelkamp, 2009). In the area of pain, a systematic review by Veehof, Oskam, Schreurs, and Bohlmeijer׳s (2011) that included acceptance-based treatments found moderate within group effect sizes for pain, depression, anxiety, physical well-being and quality of life. Analyses of controlled trials within this review revealed significant small to medium effects for the reduction of pain and depression compared to control groups. At some point an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of ACT for chronic pain will be needed. In the meantime there are other questions to review.
There are now widely disseminated guidelines for measuring outcomes in chronic pain treatment trials that emerge from what is called the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical trials (IMMPACT; Turk et al., 2003). This initiative is meant to aid comparison and pooling of data, to encourage a more complete assessment of outcomes, and support clinicians in making more informed choices of treatment, based on a clearer view of risks and benefits. The IMMPACT recommendations for core outcome domains that should be considered when evaluating treatments for pain include pain, physical functioning, emotional functioning, patient rating of global improvement, adverse events and participant disposition (such as premature withdrawal) (Turk et al., 2003). Potential supplemental outcomes domains include role and interpersonal functioning, healthcare utilization and coping. These guidelines are not meant to be rigid but are meant to allow customizing based on the particular needs of the trial
Once again the philosophy and theory underling ACT are clear on outcomes and process and these include differences from IMMPACT. In ACT pain and emotional functioning (certainly in the form of mood symptoms) would not be regarded as core or primary outcome domains. On the other hand, physical functioning and social or role performance would be primary, particularly when these aspects are attuned to patient values and goals. Secondary outcomes for ACT certainly can include pain, emotional functioning, and healthcare utilization. Whether ratings of global improvement are pertinent would lie with how this item is understood, as a reflection of symptoms or functioning. Finally, processes of change within ACT trials ought to include measures of psychological flexibility in order to assess whether treatment is working as the theory suggests. “Coping” as identified in IMMPACT might be too loosely conceived to necessarily address the specific therapeutic focus within ACT. Just as with the wider world of chronic pain treatment trials, the choices made in ACT trials are important so that data can be compared and synthesized. It is also important that outcomes are broad and inclusive enough to inform treatment choices, and to test and develop underlying therapeutic models.
The purpose of the current study is to systematically review assessment approaches used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ACT for chronic pain in adults. The specific objectives are to (a) identify the outcome domains assessed, including those defined as primary and secondary, (b) determine the degree to which these domains reflect IMMPACT versus the model underlying ACT, (c) examine current approaches to treatment process assessment in these studies, and (d) provide a brief narrative review of treatment efficacy. A secondary objective was to consider the quality of current RCTs of the ACT-based treatments for chronic pain identified.
Section snippets
Eligibility criteria
This review only includes published journal articles describing RCTs of ACT for adults with chronic pain. Trials that included samples of headache patients, children/adolescents, healthy participants or participants who had some other dominant physical or mental health issue were not considered for inclusion. Articles were excluded if they described an experimental study that was not designed as a clinical intervention or a non-randomized trial and if they reported on clinical trials of
Study characteristics
Table 1 gives details of the RCTs included in the review. The total number of participants at the start of treatment across the ten trials is 623, with sample sizes at the start of treatment ranging from 16 to 156. The majority of participants were women (around 75%) and the mean age across studies ranged from 45.1 to 85.4 years old. The average length of pain duration ranged from 6.9 to 35 years across the ten trials. The ACT treatment was predominantly provided in groups and follow-up lengths
References (65)
- et al.
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(2002) - et al.
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance
Behavior Therapy
(2011) - et al.
Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2013) - et al.
Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: A preliminary randomized trial
Behavior Therapy
(2004) - et al.
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Pain
(2005) - et al.
Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
(1998) - et al.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2006) - et al.
Relationship of pain-specific beliefs to chronic pain adjustment
Pain
(1994) - et al.
The west Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (WHYMPI)
Pain
(1985) - et al.
The impact of treatment components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: A meta-analysis of laboratory based component studies
Behaviour Therapy
(2012)
Effectiveness of group acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia: A 6-month randomized controlled trial (EFFIGACT study)
Pain
The psychological flexibility model: A basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management
The Journal of Pain
The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain
Pain
A trial of a brief group-based form of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for chronic pain in general practice: Pilot outcome and process results
The Journal of Pain
Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method
Pain
The short-form McGill pain questionnaire
Pain
Efficacy of the third wave of behavioural therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Pain and impairment beliefs in chronic low back pain: Validation of the Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (PAIRS)
Pain
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Pain
Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: An IMMPACT survey of people with pain
Pain
Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Pain
Effects of pain acceptance and pain control strategies on physical impairment in individuals with chronic low back pain
Behavior Therapy
A randomized, controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain
Pain
The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)‐further validation including a confirmatory factor analysis and a comparison with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
European Journal of Pain
Acceptance and commitment therapy and selective optimisation with compensation for older people with chronic pain: A pilot study
Behavioral Psychology/Psicologia Conductual
Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
The measure of selection, optimization and compensation (SOC) by self-report (Technical Report)
Spanish adaptation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ)
International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy
Can mindfulness and acceptance be learnt by self-help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness and acceptance-based self-help interventions
Clinical Psychological Review
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles
Journal of the American Medical Association
Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
The satisfaction with life scale
Journal of Personality Assessment
Cited by (210)
Measuring ACT in context: Challenges and future directions
2023, Journal of Contextual Behavioral SciencePotential analgesic effects of psychedelics on select chronic pain conditions: A survey study
2024, European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)The Effects of Mindfulness Interventions on Fibromyalgia in Adults aged 65 and Older: A Window to Effective Therapy
2023, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings