Time derivative equations for mode I fatigue crack growth in metals
Introduction
Predicting fatigue crack growth in metals under variable amplitude fatigue remains difficult since the available models based on the Paris law provide expressions of the cyclic crack growth rate ‘da/dN=f(Kmax, Kop, etc…)’, while loads during operating conditions are often far from being cyclic. Engineering practice consists of converting original load sequences into reconstructed sequences of fatigue cycles. However, the cycle reconstruction usually significantly modifies the load history in the signal despite the fact that is has been repeatedly shown in the past 30 years that fatigue crack growth is very sensitive to load history.
The load history effect is usually taken into account in the modelling through the variations of the crack opening stress intensity factor, Kop [1]. The effective part of a fatigue cycle is calculated as ΔKeff=Kmax−Kop and the cyclic crack growth rate is usually calculated as . The determination of the evolution of Kop with load history can be achieved using finite element method or semi-analytical models. Since the sensitivity to load history of Kop includes the sensitivity of the material itself to load history [2], the finite element method is preferred over semi-analytical models because it allows the introduction of suitable material constitutive behaviours.
However, in engineering practice, finite element methods are not employed for this purpose. First of all, it is not realistic to compute millions of elastic–plastic cycles as applied to a cracked structure and even more unrealistic if a complex elastic–plastic constitutive behaviour is needed for the material. Secondly, elaborate and time-consuming methods for computing the evolution of Kop with load history are essentially irrelevant since a significant part of load-history is lost during the cycle-reconstruction operation.
The aim of this paper is therefore to discuss the basis and to show the versatility of a mode I fatigue crack growth model expressed as a set of time derivative equations (da/dt). The present model remains within the framework of fracture mechanics and is based on the thermodynamics of dissipative processes. Its main originality lies in the introduction of a supplementary state variable for the crack which allows a continuous description of the behaviour of the crack versus time. Once this new variable is defined, the principle of virtual power, the energy balance equation, and the inequality of Clausius-Duhem are written and employed to set up the model [3]
Section snippets
Continuous characterization of the state of the crack
In practice it is common to encounter fatigue lives that stretch to tens of millions of ‘cycles’. This leads to a preference for a global approach rather than a local one. The global approach is aimed at characterizing the state of the crack through as few global variables as possible. The first state variable is the crack length a. Then, for a given crack length, the displacement field around the crack tip during a load sequence in mode I is analysed in order to find how it could be
Energy balance equation: yield criterion for the cracked structure.
The problem is assumed to be quasi-static and isothermal. In such a case, the energy balance equation is as follows:Pext is the power of the external forces, Q is the heat received by the cracked structure, and U its internal energy. The variation of the internal energy is the sum of the variation of the free energy dψ and of the variation of the stored energy Us=T dS. Eq. (1) can be alternatively expressed as follows, putting on one side the reversible terms and on the
Unzooming by the FEM
In the previous sections, a new state variable ρ was chosen for characterizing the state of a crack continuously and using the framework of the dissipative processes, the expression of its conjugate force ϕ was determined. The expression of ϕ is now known as a function of the applied remote stress and ρ is calculated as explained before using the displacement profiles of the crack faces as calculated using the FEM. It is now possible to employ the FEM in order to study the evolution of ϕ versus
Application of the model
The equations were implemented initially with an explicit integration scheme [3] and at present with the use of an implicit integration scheme.
The material parameters of the cyclic constitutive behaviour of the cracked structure are determined automatically using the finite element method. No information is required from fatigue crack growth experiments. The only experiment necessary is a cyclic push–pull test on a bar in order to determine the parameters of the cyclic constitutive behaviour of
Conclusions
In this paper, the basis of a fatigue crack growth model constituted by a set of time-derivative equations were discussed. Recognizing that service loads during operating conditions are often far from being cyclic, this new approach was developed to produce predictive capability. The classical cycle-derivative models for fatigue crack growth, based on the Paris law, imply that cycles should be extracted from the real signal. This operation usually modifies the load history in the signal.
Prospects
Since we have developed an automated identification protocol, it is reasonable to consider providing the material parameters of the equations for the cyclic-plasticity of the cracked structure directly as a function of the material parameters, such as Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, yield strength and rate and amount of kinematics hardening.
The addition of time-dependent and temperature dependent material properties may allow this theoretical framework to be expanded to the problem of
References (16)
Cyclic plasticity and variable amplitude fatigue
Int J Fatigue
(2003)- et al.
Influence of LCF overloads on combined HCF/LCF crack growth
Int J Fatigue
(2003) - et al.
The growth of corner cracks by fatigue
Int J Fatigue
(1997) - et al.
Effects of overloads in fatigue crack growth
Int J Fatigue
(1991) Fatigue crack growth due to periodic underloads and overloads
Acta Metall
(1985)The significance of fatigue crack closure
ASTM STP
(1971)- et al.
Time-derivative equations for fatigue crack growth in metals
Int J Fract
(2005) - et al.
Elastic field equations for blunt cracks with reference to stress corrosion cracking
Int J Fract Mech
(1967)
Cited by (37)
Three-dimensional numerical study of thickness effect on plastic CTOD and monotonic plastic zone in an aluminium CT specimen
2023, Theoretical and Applied Fracture MechanicsFatigue crack propagation analysis in 2024-T351 aluminium alloy using nonlinear parameters
2021, International Journal of FatigueEllipsoid non-probabilistic reliability analysis of the crack growth fatigue of a new titanium alloy used in deep-sea manned cabin
2021, Theoretical and Applied Fracture MechanicsCitation Excerpt :And fatigue strength assessment of deep-sea manned cabin which made of titanium alloy has become more important due to the increase in the requirement of the safety. Since initial defects that occur during the manufacturing and fabrication stages are generally inevitable, fatigue fracture of cracks are indeed one of the most significant mechanisms of structural deterioration [3,4]. The properties of fatigue crack growth are always determined by multiple factors, such as material features, geometrical dimensions and loading conditions, which may exhibit certain degree of uncertainty.
Consistency retention method for CNC machine tool digital twin model
2021, Journal of Manufacturing SystemsCitation Excerpt :Professor Archard put forward Archard wear theory, which is the most commonly used formula to calculate wear [13]. Besides, commonly used linear damage accumulation theory [14], anisotropic damage model [15], fatigue damage model [16], double linear damage rule [17], etc. also contribute to the study of performance attenuation calculation. The purpose of performance attenuation locating is to decide whether performance attenuation occurs on a component and determine its location if yes.
Probabilistic modeling of fatigue crack growth and experimental verification
2020, Engineering Failure AnalysisCitation Excerpt :In practical engineering, fatigue fracture is one of the most important mechanisms of structural failure. With the development of structural design techniques, the concept of damage tolerance design has attracted intensive attentions [1–3]. Among fatigue crack growth (FCG) modeling strategies, probability-based methodologies are increasingly attractive since FCG process is random in nature [4–6]; thus, the uncertainties caused by multiple factors should be included during fatigue reliability analyses [7–9,52].
Fatigue crack growth versus plastic CTOD in the 304L stainless steel
2019, Engineering Fracture Mechanics