Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051Get rights and content

Abstract

Ultrafiltration is a promising process to produce qualified drinking water. The application of ultrafiltration for drinking water production has undergone accelerated development during the past decade. Membrane fouling may be the main obstacle for wider implementation of ultrafitration, which usually causes higher costs of energy, operation, and maintenance. Fouling is formed due to pore blocking, pore stricting and cake formation. Pretreatments (e.g. coagulation, adsorption, and pre-oxidation) can in various degrees alleviate the fouling by pre-reacting with the foulants in the feed water. However, adverse effects from the pretreatment are also claimed. Moreover, modest operation methods (e.g. running modes, rinsing modes, chemical cleaning, and air scouring) can effectively obtain the fouling reduction. In this report, fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production is reviewed in terms of different effective pretreatments and operation methods. Specific mechanisms and future research required are also discussed based on the literature reviewed.

Research Highlights

► Only membrane fouling of ultrafiltration for drinking water production was considered, that is, the strategies discussed in this manuscript were all aiming at how to control the membrane fouling of ultrafiltration for drinking water production. ► In this manuscript, we presented an integrated understanding about different pretreatment methods and operation conditions. ► Some new views on the application of pretreatment methods were presented.

Introduction

Millions of preventable deaths in developing countries are due to microorganisms, which come from the polluted drinking water. Ultrafiltration (UF) can be such a way to remove the contaminants from the drinking water [1], with a relatively low cost compared with nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. With the intense regulatory activity and scarce high quality source water, UF is considered as a very promising process for drinking water production because of its compactness, easy automation, and high removal rate of turbidity, organic matters (such as humic substances), Giardia and also virus [2], [3], [4], [5]. UF is recognized as a low-pressure membrane filtration process; it is usually defined to be limited to membranes with pore diameters from 10 A to 1000 A. When the source water is passing through the filter under a trans-membrane pressure provided by the gravity or a pump, the bacteria and most viruses can be removed, the water-related disease and death from microorganisms can be prevented, the drinking water quality can be satisfied for consumers, and the use of chemicals, capital, and operating cost can be reduced. With the decreasing cost of the ultrafiltration membrane, UF technology is gradually accepted by the developing countries compared to other low-pressure membrane technologies, and is expected to be more widely applied due to the more stringent water environment.

Today, UF, as a fast-growing industry, has a significant growth for drinking water production. Though the ultrafiltration grew fast during the past twenty years, the membrane fouling problem is always the critical issue which inhibits its wider application for drinking water production [6]. Therefore, fouling reduction has been the focus for its practical application in recent years. Researchers endeavor to find a moderate pretreatment method to integrate higher removal of contaminants, lower rate of losing permeability, and lower cost of the whole process.

Previous reviews focused on the application of low-pressure membrane processes, including MF, UF, and NF, in drinking-, waste-, and industrial-water treatment. Differently, it is possibly the first time to review the application of UF as a membrane process for drinking water production in this report, and a relative comprehensive understanding of the fouling reduction by different measures is depicted.

This report is organized in four sections as bellows: 1) mechanisms of ultrafiltration and characteristics of foulants; 2) mechanisms of different pretreatment options, their performances when combined with UF with respect to the aquatic contaminants, and their contributions to the fouling control of the UF membrane; 3) fouling control through operation changes; 4) and future research and outlook of ultrafiltration for drinking water production.

Section snippets

Principles of membrane fouling

In principle, ultrafiltration of natural waters involves complicated physical, chemical, and biological reactions among the impurities or between the impurities and the membrane surface. In the practical operation, the reactions are often influenced by each other, and therefore, present more complicated effects on membrane fouling of ultrafiltration in drinking water production, especially when an uncertain specific quality turns out from the source water.

Effect of different pretreatment options

Pretreatment can increase the permeate quality and reduce membrane fouling [35]. Currently, there are several common options: coagulation, adsorption, oxidation, MIEX, biological treatment, and some integrated pretreatments. The efficiency of pretreatment in removing aquatic contaminants and reducing membrane fouling is strongly associated with the type of the agents (coagulant, adsorbent, oxidant, etc.), dosage, dosing modes (continuous or intermittent), dosing point, mixing ways, temperature,

Fouling control through operational conditions

In addition to the pretreatments (e.g. coagulation, adsorption, and pre-oxidation), it is also important that the different operation conditions can reduce membrane fouling to some extent. As previously reported, fouling is formed because of the impurities rejected by or adsorbed on the membrane surface, and some complicated interactions then may happen between the impurities and the membrane surface. Therefore, theoretically, there should be a reasonable way to apply some proper operation or

Future research and outlook

The mechanism of membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of natural water for drinking water production is fundamental for enhancing the performance and reducing the membrane fouling. Research on the mechanism must be based on a good understanding of the principles of the ultrafiltration. Researchers should recognize the difference between the ultrafiltration and other low-pressure membrane processes in order to provide some new insights into the mechanisms of membrane fouling in drinking water

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.50808051), the National Innovation Team Supported by National Science Foundation of China (Grant No.50821002), the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT. Grant No.2010DX01) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No.HIT.NSRIF.2009116).

References (73)

  • NoHwa Lee et al.

    Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter

    Water Res.

    (2006)
  • Gary Amy

    Fundamental understanding of organic matter fouling of membranes

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • Eun Kyung Lee et al.

    Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling in low pressure membrane filtration — effect of membranes and operation modes

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • A.W. Zularisam et al.

    The effects of natural organic matter (NOM) fractions on fouling characteristics and flux recovery of ultrafiltration membranes

    Desalination

    (2007)
  • Cheng-Fang Lin et al.

    Ultrafiltration processes for removing humic substances: effect of molecular weight fractions and PAC treatment

    Water Res.

    (1999)
  • Cheng-Fang Lin et al.

    Effects of humic substance characteristics on UF performance

    Water Res.

    (2000)
  • Cheng-Fang Lin et al.

    Effect of functional groups of humic substances on UF performance

    Water Res.

    (2001)
  • Jaeweon Cho et al.

    Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • A.W. Zularisam et al.

    Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment — a review

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • B. Kwon et al.

    Effect of algae on fouling and efficiency of UF membranes

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • K. Kimura et al.

    Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water

    Water Res.

    (2004)
  • Jeonghwan Kim et al.

    Critical review fouling models for low-pressure membrane systems

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2009)
  • Qiao Xiangli et al.

    Coagulation pretreatment for a large-scale ultrafiltration process treating water from the Taihu River

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • Heng Liang et al.

    Cleaning of fouled ultrafiltration (UF) membrane by algae during reservoir water treatment

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • Bing-zhi Dong et al.

    Effect of coagulation pretreatment on the fouling of ultrafiltration membrane

    Desalination

    (2007)
  • Pyung-kyu Park et al.

    Effect of the removal of DOMs on the performance of a coagulation-UF membrane system for drinking water production

    Desalination

    (2002)
  • Malgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz

    Removal of natural organic matter from water by in-line coagulation/ultrafiltration process

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • S. Chang et al.

    A simplified model for trace organics removal by continuous flow PAC adsorption/submerged membrane processes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2005)
  • Sylwia Mozia et al.

    Treatment of surface water using hybrid processes — adsorption on PAC and ultrafiltration

    Desalination

    (2004)
  • Sheng-ji Xia et al.

    Drinking water production by ultrafiltration of Songhuajiang River with PAC adsorption

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2007)
  • Margarida Campinas et al.

    Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systems

    Water Res.

    (2010)
  • Hye-Jin Hong et al.

    Removal of anionic contaminants by surfactant modified powdered activated carbon (SM-PAC) combined with ultrafiltration

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • Jeonghwan Kim et al.

    Effect of ozone dosage and hydrodynamic conditions on the permeate flux in a hybrid ozonation–ceramic ultrafiltration system treating natural waters

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • S. Mozia et al.

    Application of an ozonation–adsorption–ultrafiltration system for surface water treatment

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • B. Schlichter et al.

    Study of a hybrid process combining ozonation and microfiltration/ultrafiltration for drinking water production from surface water

    Desalination

    (2004)
  • Ronan Treguer et al.

    Ozonation effect on natural organic matter adsorption and biodegradation — application to a membrane bioreactor containing activated carbon for drinking water production

    Water Res.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (757)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text