Full Length ArticleBridging the online/offline divide: The example of digital gaming
Introduction
Contemporary life is increasingly interlaced with digital technology (Castells, 2001) and leisure activities are one important arena that have seen a digitalization. Leisure is a significant part of people’s lives and what activities are available, participated in, and valued at any specific time and place is shaped by current culture (Kelly, 1983). Activities engaged in as leisure, such as games, hobbies, simply talking and so on, are increasingly embedded in digital technology, and as these activities go digital, they break away from earlier restrictions that limited them to certain times and spaces. Online and offline are terms often used when the aim is to distinguish between types of activities utilizing different technologies with different social implications and meanings. Early Internet and digital games research pointed at the liberating aspects of online life—how we in online social spaces could free ourselves from the constraints in our physical lives. Since then, research has increasingly come to show how the Internet is not creating ‘new’ social patterns but rather is an extension of our selves (Castells, 2001). Researchers have argued that we cannot understand sociality online unless we connect both online and offline (Williams, 2006) and that virtuality is a social property rather than an inherent quality of online social life (Slater, 2002). However, often the study of online social worlds, such as digital games, has not fully realized this development. There is a practice of separating offline and online and treating online worlds as social spheres disconnected from offline life. In a recent review of empirical research concerned with community in online gaming (Warmelink & Siitonen, 2011), no connection between online and offline was prevalent so far in the literature. Lehdonvirta (2010) argues that especially MMO (massive multiplayer online games) studies have been based on the dichotomous ‘real world’/‘virtual world’. The aim of this study is therefore to empirically examine the link between online and offline in social Internet based gaming in order to ground this theoretical development in empirical data. The research question asks: How is online and offline linked through MMO gaming? The study sets out to answer this through interviews with 33 Swedish informants that together have a wide range of experiences from a multitude of different massive multiplayer online games. The aim is not to offer a generalizable picture, but to show how using an approach that attempts to connect rather than separate online and offline can benefit our knowledge and understanding of online social life. Focus is on analysing the nature of social experiences and preferences and through this reach analytical clarity on the relationship between online and offline. The results explore three themes; (1) sociability and design; (2) group membership; (3) norms and rules. The study touches on some classic phenomena in studies of online life, but does so while bridging the online/offline divide in order to reach new understanding about digital social life.
Sweden is often considered a forerunner with regard to digital media. According to survey data, almost 90% of Swedes (18+) have access to the Internet and digital gaming is widespread with 62.5% of Swedes aged 12–65 engaged (Findahl, 2011). Sweden rates among the top countries in E-sports and hosts the world’s largest local area network festival, Dreamhack, with over 20,000 visitors in 2011. The Swedish context of extensive use therefore offers a suitable ground for the study.
Section snippets
Understanding the relationship between online/offline
The Internet and other digital technologies have changed our access to information, and the Internet’s capabilities for person to person connectivity have deeply impacted many aspects of life. The effect of the Internet on social interaction and relationships is a complex issue, yet the very practices through which people interact with each other is one of the main agendas both for previous and future research on New Media and the Internet (Lievrouw, 2011), and Game Studies is an important part
Methodology
This study explores social online gaming with focus on adult gamers—a previously less investigated group (Thornham, 2009). Interviews have been suggested by Strauss as a suitable method when researching social worlds (Strauss, 1978). A phenomenology inspired approach has been used (see Aspers, 2001). In line with this the results presented have been reached inductively, allowing the data to represent the informants own experienced reality, while the discussion has evolved deductively. The
Results
Of the informants almost half are women and half men; ages span from 17 to 49 years old (median 25). As many men as women had experiences from MMOs, although all played games with others online. Only two informants, a man and a woman, did not game regularly at the time of the interview. Both used to spend more time on games in the recent past but new responsibilities currently made it difficult for them to find time. In Table 1, data from the short questionnaire is presented with some background
Discussion
The results show, in line with previous research (Stenros et al., 2011), that the attraction of MMOs lies both in the opportunity to engage in collaborative action and the support for sociability that this joint action provides. The results also show that for games to support sociability gamers need to play together, not only occupy the same game-space, and the game also needs to reward social behaviour. The rational, reward seeking behaviour MMO games encourage can, in the case of
Conclusions
This study explored how online and offline are linked in concrete user practises; asking: How is online and offline linked in social MMO gaming? While the results cannot be generalized they still show that instead of focusing on the online/offline division as such, we should see any such barrier as highly contingent on the practices engaged in.
This study concludes that on- and offline are inexorably linked through the social organizational demands of online gaming. An online game puts people
References (42)
- Adams, E. (2003). The construction of ludic space. In Proceedings of: DIGRA conference: Level up, Utrecht, the...
- et al.
Digital media studies futures
Media, Culture and Society
(2013) - Aspers, P. (2001). Markets in fashion, A phenomenological approach. Stockholm: City University Press (Chapter: Appendix...
- et al.
Achievements, motivations and rewards in faunasphere
Game Studies
(2011) The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom
(2006)Qualitative research methods for the social sciences
(2009)Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development
(1998)The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society
(2001)- Christensen, M., Jansson, A. & Christensen, C. (Eds.) (2011). Online territories: Globalization, mediated practice and...
- et al.
Challenges of designing for sociability to enhance player experience in Massively Multi-player Online Role-playing Games
Behaviour & Information Technology
(2013)
There is no magic circle
Games and Culture
Video gamers
Virtual “Third Places”: A case study of sociability in massively multiplayer games
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Played and designed sociality in a massive multiplayer online game
Eludamos
The focused organization of social ties
American Journal of Sociology
A theory of social comparison processes
Human Relations
Swedes and the internet
Neuromancer
Time and space in cyber social reality
New Media and Society
Cited by (36)
Video games and creativity: The mediating role of psychological capital
2023, Journal of CreativityTransitional space and new forms of value co-creation in online brand communities
2023, Journal of Business ResearchDoes the social platform established by MMORPGs build social and psychological capital?
2022, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :As such, the second objective of this study is to explore the relationship between MMORPG players' learning experience and social capital, especially with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic. Social interaction is an important feature of MMORPGs, as game-play requires a group effort to achieve game goals: gamers collaborate, compete, and interact with each other (Eklund, 2015). In turn, the third objective of this study is to explore the relationship between social interaction and social capital.
Understanding the “social” nature of digital games
2021, Entertainment ComputingCitation Excerpt :That is, “social gaming” is perhaps best understood from the perspective that social affordances between online and offline contexts may be fluid [15,16]. Namely, previous evidence suggests that “offline” relationships and characteristics influence online group membership and engagement in online gaming [15], and that “social gaming” takes place across many types of social relations including family members, online friends [14]. As such, to understand the social nature of gaming, this should be considered fluid between contexts and not be defined as a straightforward dichotomy.
The common player-avatar interaction scale (cPAX): Expansion and cross-language validation
2019, International Journal of Human Computer StudiesCitation Excerpt :Notably, in these regional reports, all three regions are documented as engaging MMOs, a critical point of comparison for the current study. Normative differences may extend beyond the games themselves, as some evidence points to regional differences in gaming behavior (Quandt et al., 2014) and nation- or language-based differences in gaming group formation (Eklund, 2015). Other work suggests more homogenous patterns in gaming behaviors across cultural groups, such as tendencies to build social ties through gaming (Schiano et al., 2011).
Do adolescent gamers make friends offline? Identity and friendship formation in school
2017, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, this study adds a perspective of how digital activities such as gaming link in and affect offline social life; here life in school. Studies have shown how online and offline life are intimately linked (Beltagui & Schmidt, 2015; Eklund, 2015b; Williams, 2006). Our digital lives tie in with our non-digital lives in such ways that it makes little sense talking about them as separate spaces.