Regulation of heterochromatin by histone methylation and small RNAs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.04.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Heterochromatin mediates various nuclear processes including centromere function, gene silencing and nuclear organization. Although it was discovered nearly 75 years ago, the pathways involved in heterochromatin establishment, assembly and epigenetic maintenance have been elusive. Recent reports have demonstrated that distinct and novel chromatin-associated factors, including DNA, RNA and histone modifications, are involved in each of these events. These new findings define a novel conserved mechanism of heterochromatin formation that is likely to have an impact on all eukaryotic silencing pathways.

Introduction

Heterochromatin was originally defined as the fraction of the genome that remained visibly condensed during interphase [1]. More recently, it has been defined as the genomic regions that are gene-poor and are inaccessible to DNA-modifying reagents 2., 3.. Because the DNA within heterochromatin is condensed, it is largely believed that these regions are transcriptionally silenced. Early studies of heterochromatin led to the discovery of a phenomenon known as position effect variegation (PEV) [4], where a euchromatic gene placed near or within heterochromatin becomes epigenetically silenced [5]. The implications of epigenetic silencing in normal developmental gene regulation, aging and cancer progression have made heterochromatin the focus of intense investigation over the past few decades, although insights into heterochromatin establishment and maintenance have been lacking.

Recent findings have reshaped the way we think about heterochromatin, especially how it is formed and epigenetically maintained. In this review, we discuss some of the most recent findings in heterochromatin research with particular emphasis on histone H3 lysine 9 (H3 Lys9) mono-, di- and trimethylation and RNAi-mediated transcriptional silencing. Additionally, we will discuss some of the important implications of these recent findings and predict what the next few years will bring.

Section snippets

Histone methylation and heterochromatin

Within the eukaryotic nucleus, DNA is packaged with chromosomal proteins to form chromatin. The most fundamental repeating unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which consists of 146 bp of DNA wrapped around an octamer of histone proteins made up of two copies each of H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 [6]. These evolutionarily conserved proteins consist of a globular C-terminal domain critical to nucleosome formation and a flexible N-terminal tail that protrudes from the nucleosome. These tails are targets for

Three degrees of methylation

One possible answer to these questions is that specific HMTs differentially methylate H3 Lys9 to a certain degree. The ε-amino group of lysine can accept up to three methyl groups and hence can be mono-, di- or trimethylated [13]. Different mass spectrometric techniques have identified several human histone lysine residues, including H3 Lys9, that are mono-, di- or trimethylated in vivo 35., 36., 37.. Although the biological significance of these differences was unknown, recent reports indicate

Targeted for silence: transposons and repeats

In addition to understanding the role of histone-modifying activities and the factors that recognize differentially modified histone tails, it is important to comprehend the mechanisms that define specific chromosomal domains as sites of heterochromatin assembly. In higher eukaryotes, a significant amount of genomic DNA is assembled into heterochromatic structures. Small blocks of silent chromatin structures are interspersed throughout the chromosomes and are essential for the maintenance of

DNA-based targeting of heterochromatin

Studies from plants, animals and fungi suggest that multiple mechanisms may be responsible for the initial targeting of heterochromatin complexes in different chromosomal contexts. One of these mechanisms probably involves factors that target specific DNA sequences. Certain DNA-binding factors that recognize specific DNA elements or silencers can nucleate heterochromatin, one example being the Sir-mediated silencing in S. cerevisiae. These DNA binding factors often possess modular structures

RNAi-mediated nucleation of heterochromatin

In addition to the DNA-binding proteins, recent studies suggest that RNA interference (RNAi), a new and increasingly well-studied process, targets repressive chromosomal complexes to specific chromosomal loci. In this fundamentally novel process, RNA provides specificity for the precise targeting of silent chromatin complexes to particular genomic loci. RNAi is an evolutionarily conserved silencing mechanism that is triggered by double stranded RNA (dsRNA) and serves to regulate gene expression

RITS: an RNAi effector complex for heterochromatin assembly

Although they were known to be involved in this pathway, it was not clear exactly how siRNAs promoted targeted assembly of heterochromatin. It had been hypothesized that a RISC-like heterochromatin-targeting complex containing the Argonaute protein binds to siRNAs and promotes their pairing to either nascent transcripts or homologous DNA sequences at the target locus 80., 81.. A recent study provided the first direct evidence for the existence of an RNAi effector complex called RITS

Step-wise model for RNAi-mediated epigenetic gene silencing

Increasing evidence indicates that heterochromatin assembly is a multi-step process. Heterochromatin is believed to nucleate at specific regulatory sequences and then spreads into neighboring sequences, resulting in epigenetic gene silencing [80]. There seem to be distinct requirements for the nucleation, spreading and maintenance of heterochromatin structures [43] (Figure 2). For nucleation, dsRNAs generated from the repetitive sequences are processed into siRNAs by the Dicer ribonuclease.

Conclusions

Quite recently, significant findings have led to a redefinition of heterochromatin regulation in terms of histone methylation and small RNAs. New data suggests that different degrees of H3 Lys9 methylation define specific heterochromatin domains (facultative versus constitutive) (Figure 1). It is clear that the degree of methylation is dictated by the specific HMT and where it is localized in the genome. For example, Suv39h1 and Suv39h2 localize to constitutive heterochromatin and specifically

Update

In recent paper, Freitag et al. showed that the HP1 homologue in Neurospora crassa was required for DNA methylation at the relics of transposons [83]. This new result extends previous studies by the Selker laboratory demonstrating that the histone H3 Lys9 trimethyltransferase DIM-5 is required for all known DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa [84]. Also recently, Chan et al. showed that factors involved in the RNAi pathway, such as RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 2 (rdr2), dicer-like 3 (dcr3),

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • of special interest

  • ••

    of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

Our apologies to colleagues whose work has not been cited in this article due to space limitations. We thank E Chen, S Jia and T Sugiyama for critical comments and members of the Grewal laboratory for helpful discussions. Research in SG’s laboratory is supported by the National Cancer Institute.

References (85)

  • A.L Nielsen et al.

    Heterochromatin formation in mammalian cells: interaction between histones and HP1 proteins

    Mol Cell

    (2001)
  • E.U Selker

    Repeat-induced gene silencing in fungi

    Adv Genet

    (2002)
  • D Garrick et al.

    Repeat-induced gene silencing in mammals

    Nature Genetics

    (1998)
  • Birchler JA, Pal-Bhadra M, Bhadra U: Transgene cosuppression in animals. In RNAi: a guide to gene silencing. Edited by...
  • S.I Grewal et al.

    A recombinationally repressed region between mat2 and mat3 loci shares homology to centromeric repeats and regulates directionality of mating-type switching in fission yeast

    Genetics

    (1997)
  • I Hall et al.

    Establishment and maintenance of a heterochromatic domain

    Science

    (2002)
  • M.A Matzke et al.

    Homology-dependent gene silencing and host defense in plants

    Adv Genet

    (2002)
  • D.C Schultz et al.

    SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins

    Genes Dev

    (2002)
  • G.J Hannon

    RNA interference

    Nature

    (2002)
  • A.A Aravin et al.

    The small RNA profile during Drosophila melanogaster development

    Dev Cell

    (2003)
  • S.I Grewal et al.

    Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression

    Science

    (2003)
  • I.M Hall et al.

    RNA interference machinery regulates chromosome dynamics during mitosis and meiosis in fission yeast

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2003)
  • E Heitz

    Das heterochromatin der moose

    I Jahrb Wiss Botanik

    (1928)
  • W Hennig

    Heterochromatin

    Chromosoma

    (1999)
  • H Muller

    Types of visible variations induced by X-rays in Drosophila

    J Genet

    (1930)
  • K Luger et al.

    Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution

    Nature

    (1997)
  • B.D Strahl et al.

    The language of covalent histone modifications

    Nature

    (2000)
  • B.M Turner

    Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code

    Bioessays

    (2000)
  • A Eberharter et al.

    Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin. Second in review series on chromatin dynamics

    EMBO Rep

    (2002)
  • K Murray

    The occurrence of ε-N-methyl lysine in histones

    Biochemistry

    (1964)
  • Y Zhang et al.

    Transcription regulation by histone methylation: interplay between different covalent modifications of the core histone tails

    Genes Dev

    (2001)
  • S Rea et al.

    Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases

    Nature

    (2000)
  • L Aagaard et al.

    Functional mammalian homologues of the Drosophila PEV-modifier Su(var)3-9 encode centromere-associated proteins which complex with the heterochromatin component M31

    EMBO J

    (1999)
  • S Bultman et al.

    Molecular and genetic analysis of the mouse homolog of the Drosophila suppressor of position-effect variegation 3-9 gene

    Mamm Genome

    (2000)
  • M Melcher et al.

    Structure–function analysis of SUV39H1 reveals a dominant role in heterochromatin organization, chromosome segregation, and mitotic progression

    Mol Cell Biol

    (2000)
  • J Nakayama et al.

    Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly

    Science

    (2001)
  • M Lachner et al.

    Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins

    Nature

    (2001)
  • A.J Bannister et al.

    Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain

    Nature

    (2001)
  • S.A Jacobs et al.

    Specificity of the HP1 chromo domain for the methylated N-terminus of histone H3

    EMBO J

    (2001)
  • P.R Nielsen et al.

    Structure of the HP1 chromodomain bound to histone H3 methylated at lysine 9

    Nature

    (2002)
  • M Lachner et al.

    An epigenetic road map for histone lysine methylation

    J Cell Sci

    (2003)
  • M Garcia-Cao et al.

    Epigenetic regulation of telomere length in mammalian cells by the Suv39h1 and Suv39h2 histone methyltransferases

    Nat Genet

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text