Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 29, Issue 3, January 2008, Pages 290-301
Biomaterials

Synthetic sandwich culture of 3D hepatocyte monolayer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.016Get rights and content

Abstract

The sandwich culture of hepatocytes, between double layers of extra-cellular matrix (ECM), is a well-established in vitro model for re-establishing hepatic polarity and maintaining differentiated functions. Applications of the ECM-based sandwich culture are limited by the mass transfer barriers induced by the top gelled ECM layer, complex molecular composition of ECM with batch-to-batch variation and uncontrollable coating of the ECM double layers. We have addressed these limitations of the ECM-based sandwich culture by developing an ‘ECM-free’ synthetic sandwich culture, which is constructed by sandwiching a 3D hepatocyte monolayer between a glycine-arginine-glycine-aspatic acid-serine (GRGDS)-modified polyethylene terephthalate (PET) track-etched membrane (top support) and a galactosylated PET film (bottom substratum). The bioactive top support and bottom substratum in the synthetic sandwich culture substituted for the functionalities of the ECM in the ECM-based sandwich culture with further improvement in mass transfer and optimal material properties. The 3D hepatocyte monolayer in the synthetic sandwich culture exhibited a similar process of hepatic polarity formation, better cell–cell interaction and improved differentiated functions over 14-day culture compared to the hepatocytes in collagen sandwich culture. The novel 3D hepatocyte monolayer sandwich culture using bioactive synthetic materials may readily replace the ECM-based sandwich culture for liver tissue engineering applications, such as drug metabolism/toxicity testing and hepatocyte-based bioreactors.

Introduction

In vivo, hepatocytes are organized into a polarized epithelium with distinct apical (bile canalicular) and basal (sinusoidal) domains [1]. The basal domain of the hepatocytes is in contact with a complex extracellular matrix (ECM) containing fibronectin, laminin, collagen I–V, and proteoglycans in the space of Disse [2]. The interactions of hepatocytes with the ECM environment are important for hepatic polarity and differentiated function maintenance [3]. In standard in vitro culture, primary hepatocytes cultured on substrates coated with ECM protein, such as collagen or fibronectin, typically exhibit spreading morphology with deteriorating differentiated functions and nearly no polarized structure [4]. This deteriorating process could be rescued by overlaying another ECM layer, such as collagen or basement membrane (Matrigel™), which mimics the ECM distribution in the space of Disse. Hepatocyte sandwich culture between double layers of ECM is an in vitro model with re-established hepatic polarity and stable differentiated functions [3], [5], [6]. The hepatocyte sandwich culture has been adopted in liver physiology studies [7], [8], drug metabolism/toxicity testing [9] and hepatocyte-based bioreactors [10], [11]. Further applications of the conventional ECM-based sandwich culture were hampered by the complex molecular compositions of the ECM with batch to batch variation [12], uncontrollable ECM coating, mass transfer barriers induced by the gelled ECM-coated top support (hindering the exchange of nutrients, xenobiotics or biochemical signals with the bulk culture medium), and shedding of the ECM coating from the top support during culture. In this study, we have addressed these limitations of the ECM-based sandwich culture by developing an ‘ECM-free’ synthetic sandwich culture, in which we replaced the natural ECM with bioactive polymeric materials to achieve improved mass transfer and stable differentiated functions.

A variety of synthetic substrata with bioactive components, such as cell adhesion peptides: Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) [13], Tyr-Ile-Gly-Ser-Arg (YIGSR) [14], Gly-Phe-Hyp-Gly-Glu-Arg (GFOGER) [15] or sugar ligands: galactose [16], glucose [17], lactose [18], have been used for cell culture to replace natural ECM with well-controlled material properties and cellular responses. Previously, we have fabricated a galactosylated polyethylene terephthalate (PET-Gal) film for primary rat hepatocyte culture and identified a 3D hepatocyte monolayer formed on the PET-Gal [19]. The 3D hepatocyte monolayer exhibited 3D cellular structure and polarities, enhanced cell–cell interactions and differentiated functions compared to the 2D hepatocyte monolayer on collagen-coated substratum [19]. Here, we established a synthetic sandwich culture by overlaying the 3D hepatocyte monolayer on the PET-Gal (bottom substratum) with a porous PET track-etched (TE) membrane (top support). Since the biochemical compositions of ECM play essential roles in regulating hepatocyte morphology, polarity and differentiated functions in ECM-based sandwich culture [20], [21], [22], we investigated the influence of three different top support (galactosylated, GRGDS-modified or non-modified PET TE membrane) on the hepatocyte morphology, polarity and differentiated functions in the 3D hepatocyte monolayer of the synthetic sandwich culture. The synthetic sandwich culture with GRGDS-modified PET TE membrane (top support)/PET-Gal (bottom substratum) exhibited the optimal performances, in terms of stabilizing the 3D monolayer morphology, re-establishing hepatocyte polarity and maintaining other differentiated functions.

We compared this GRGDS-modified PET TE membrane/PET-Gal synthetic sandwich culture of 3D hepatocyte monolayer with the collagen sandwich hepatocyte culture. 3D hepatocyte monolayer in the synthetic sandwich culture exhibited similar dynamic process of polarity formation and biliary excretion, improved mass transfer, enhanced cell–cell interaction, differentiated functions compared with the hepatocytes in the collagen sandwich culture. This synthetic sandwich culture model can replace the ECM-based sandwich culture for relevant hepatocyte-based applications such as drug metabolism/toxicity testing and hepatocyte-based bioreactors [7], [8].

Section snippets

Materials

PET TE membranes with thickness of 9 μm, pore density of 3×107 pores/cm2 and pore diameter of 0.8 μm were purchased from Sterlitech (WA, USA). The galactose ligand, 1-O-(6′-aminohexyl)-d-galactopyranoside (AHG, M.W. 279) was synthesized previously [23], [24], [25]. GRGDS peptide was purchased from Peptides International (Kentucky, USA). Minusheet carriers were purchased from Minucells and Minutissue Vertriebs GmbH (Bad Abbach, Germany). Primary rabbit anti-E-Cadherin and anti-GAPDH antibody were

Fabrication and characterization of bioactive PET TE membranes to construct the synthetic sandwich culture

The synthetic sandwich culture was constructed by a PET-Gal as the bottom substratum and a PET TE membrane (GRGDS-modified or galactosylated or non-modified) as the top support. The entire sandwich construct was secured in the Minusheet Carriers (Fig. 1A).

The fabrication and characterization of the PET-Gal (bottom substratum) were described previously [26]. We fabricated here GRGDS-modified or galactosylated PET TE membranes (top support, Fig. 1B) based on the commercially available PET TE

Discussion

A novel synthetic sandwich culture was developed by overlaying a 3D hepatocyte monolayer formed on a PET-Gal with a GRGDS-modified PET TE membrane top support. This 3D hepatocyte monolayer has been characterized previously with improved cellular structure and polarities, enhanced cell–cell interactions, better differentiated functions compared to the hepatocyte monolayer on collagen-coated substratum. Due to the weak adhesive force obtained from the bottom galactosylated substratum as well as

Conclusions

We have established an ECM-free synthetic sandwich culture by maintaining a 3D hepatocyte monolayer between a GRGDS-modified PET TE membrane (top support) and a PET-Gal (bottom substratum). The 3D hepatocyte monolayer in the synthetic sandwich culture exhibited similar polarity formation, improved mass transfer, enhanced cell–cell interactions and higher differentiated functions compared with the hepatocytes in the conventional collagen sandwich culture. This synthetic sandwich culture can

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Talha Arooz and Ms. Tse Kit Yan for the technical support. This work is supported in part by the Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) of Singapore (R185-001-045-305); Ministry of Education Grant R-185-000-135-112, National Medical Research Council Grant R-185-000-099-213 and Singapore-MIT Alliance Computational and Systems Biology Flagship Project funding to HYU. YND, RBH and

References (45)

  • J. Marchand-Brynaert et al.

    Biological evaluation of RGD peptidomimetics, designed for the covalent derivatization of cell culture substrata, as potential promotors of cellular adhesion

    Biomaterials

    (1999)
  • P.O. Seglen

    Preparation of isolated rat liver cells

    Methods Cell Biol

    (1976)
  • G.A. LeBlanc

    Hepatic vectorial transport of xenobiotics

    Chem Biol Interact

    (1994)
  • H.F. Lodish

    Recognition of complex oligosaccharides by the multi-subunit asialoglycoprotein receptor

    Trends Biochem Sci

    (1991)
  • G.G. Pinkse et al.

    RGD peptides confer survival to hepatocytes via the beta1-integrin-ILK-pAkt pathway

    J Hepatol

    (2005)
  • M.H. Fittkau et al.

    The selective modulation of endothelial cell mobility on RGD peptide containing surfaces by YIGSR peptides

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • K. Bhadriraju et al.

    Hepatocyte adhesion, growth and differentiated function on RGD-containing proteins

    Biomaterials

    (2000)
  • T.M. Walker et al.

    The differential cytotoxicity of methotrexate in rat hepatocyte monolayer and spheroid cultures

    Toxicol In Vitro

    (2000)
  • J.C. Dunn et al.

    Hepatocyte function and extracellular matrix geometry: long-term culture in a sandwich configuration

    Faseb J

    (1989)
  • R.C. Hughes et al.

    Adhesive interactions and the metabolic activity of hepatocytes

    J Cell Sci Suppl

    (1987)
  • F. Berthiaume et al.

    Effect of extracellular matrix topology on cell structure, function, and physiological responsiveness: hepatocytes cultured in a sandwich configuration

    Faseb J

    (1996)
  • D.M. Bissell

    Primary hepatocyte culture: substratum requirements and production of matrix components

    Fed Proc

    (1981)
  • Cited by (75)

    • Bioprinting of Biomimetic Tissue Models for Disease Modeling and Drug Screening

      2022, 3D Bioprinting and Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    • Carbon nanotubes as biological transporters and tissue-engineering scaffolds

      2018, Synthesis, Technology and Applications of Carbon Nanomaterials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contribute equally to this work.

    View full text