Immunological aspects of chronic fatigue syndrome
Introduction
The term “chronic fatigue syndrome” was proposed in 1988 by the United States Centres for Disease Control to describe a specific clinical condition that characterises unexplained disabling fatigue and a combination of non-specific accompanying symptoms [1]. Similar disorders have been described for at least two centuries and have been differently named neurasthenia, post-viral fatigue, myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic mononucleosis [2], [3]. Chronic fatigue syndrome is a diagnosis of exclusion. CFS can be diagnosed after ruling out other medical or psychiatric causes of chronic fatigue [4], [5], [6]. No clinical examination signs, no diagnostic tests are specific, no definitive treatments exist for CFS. Recent longitudinal studies suggest that some people affected by chronic fatigue syndrome improve with time but that most remain functionally impaired for several years [7], [8], [9].
The estimated worldwide prevalence of CFS is 0.4–1% and it affects over 800,000 people in the United States and approximately 240,000 patients in the UK [4], [10]. However, a recent report pointed to the variability of CFS prevalence based on differing studies [4], [9]. Another important question is whether CFS is a homogeneous or heterogeneous disorder: various researchers have called for investigation of subgroups by features such as chronicity, immunological activity and neurobiology [9], [10], [11], [12]. This disorder does not seem to prevail in definite geographic areas and ethnic groups [8], [9], [11], but predominantly affects young adults, with a peak age of onset of between 20 and 40 years, and women, with a female to male ratio of 6:1. Mean illness duration ranges from 3 to 9 years [4], [11], [12]. The pathophysiological mechanism of CFS is unclear. The main hypotheses include altered central nervous system functioning resulting from an abnormal immune response against a common antigen; a neuroendocrine disturbance; cognitive impairment caused by response to infection or other stimuli in sentient people [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Heterogeneity within patient groups diagnosed as having CFS suggests multiple contributing factors to the disorder Fig. 1) [4], [6], [9], [11], [18], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Further epidemiological studies and differing research approaches will contribute to evaluating the real incidence of the pathology. The results of an Australian study, for example, showed that people affected by bacterial and viral infections have a relatively uniform post infective syndrome that persists over six months in a minority of patients (12%) with CFS features [3], [16], [19], [26]. Evidence of enteroviruses infection persistence was founded in CFS patients [13], [14], [15], [19], [27]. These findings are in agreement with a genetic basis of the response by subjects with CFS syndrome to an infectious agent [5], [13], [14], [16], [17], [18], [25].
Section snippets
Clinical features of CFS syndrome
CFS has no confirmatory clinical signs or characteristic laboratory abnormalities so the ‘gold standard’ is defined by disabling chronic fatigue and characteristic non-specific accompanying symptoms [1], [2], [8], [10]. Current diagnostic criteria describe CFS as a syndrome of physical and mental fatigue, usually of acute onset, which is markedly exacerbated by physical activity. Sometimes a gradual onset is described, in which the symptom complex develops over weeks or months. Other common
Immunological hypothesis of CFS syndrome
Two and a half decades after the coining of the term CFS, the diagnosis of this illness is still symptom based and the aetiology remains elusive. A consensus regarding the aetiology and pathophysiology of CFS has not yet been developed [1], [4], [11], [19], [20]. The current concept is that CFS pathogenesis is a multifactorial condition. [1], [4], [6], [16], [21], [28]. A possible involvement of the immune system is supported by the observation that the onset of CFS is often preceded by virus
Conclusion
The lack of objective biochemical and/or cellular diagnostic markers has resulted in considerable confusion in diagnosing the syndrome and in scientific investigation of its aetiology and pathophysiology. The diagnosis of CFS is highly problematic since no biological markers specific to this disease have been identified. CFS is a misunderstood, debilitating condition of unknown aetiology. Results suggest a common link between the central nervous system, infection, and the immune system. Present
Take-home messages
- •
Patients with CFS appear to have a variety of abnormalities in their immune cells that support the presence of an underlying immunological problem.
- •
These immunological findings show that patients with CFS may have an infection and that the immune system is chronically activated in response.
- •
Several of the differentially expressed genes are related to immunological functions and implicate immune dysfunction in the pathophysiology of disease. Once identified, these genes could serve as CFS
References (40)
- et al.
Fibromyalgia, infection and vaccination: Two more parts in the etiological puzzle
J Autoimmun
(2006) - et al.
Chronic fatigue syndrome
J Clin Virol
(2006) Infections and autoimmune diseases
J Autoimmun
(2005)- et al.
Improving the diagnostic criteria and procedures for chronic fatigue syndrome
Biol Psychol
(2005) The heterogeneity of juvenile myositis
Autoimmun Rev
(2007)- et al.
Low NK syndrome and its relationship to chronic fatigue syndrome
Clin Immunol Immunopathol
(1993) - et al.
On the relationship between viral infection and autoimmunity
J Autoimmun
(2001) - et al.
Stress as a trigger of autoimmune disease
Autoimmun Rev
(2008) - et al.
Possible role for early-life immune insult including developmental immunotoxicity in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)
Toxicology
(2008) - et al.
Functional autoantibodies, a new paradigm in autoimmunity?
Autoimmun Rev
(2007)
A case-control study to assess possible triggers and cofactors in chronic fatigue syndrome
Am J Med
Cytokine production and modulation: comparison of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and normal controls
Psychiatry Res
Cell damage and autoimmunity: a critical appraisal
J Autoimmun
The mosaic of autoimmunity
Autoimmun Rev
A 37 kDa 2–5 A binding protein as a potential biochemical marker for chronic fatigue syndrome
Am J Med
Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition
Ann Intern Med
The chronic fatigue syndrome-an update
Acta Neurol Scand
Longitudinal study of outcome of chronic fatigue syndrome
BMJ
Azithromycin in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), an analysis of clinical data
J Transl Med
Prevalence and incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome in Wichita, Kansas
Arch Intern Med
Cited by (219)
Sex differences in vascular endothelial function related to acute and long COVID-19
2024, Vascular PharmacologyPost-viral fatigue in COVID-19: A review of symptom assessment methods, mental, cognitive, and physical impairment
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsEpstein–Barr virus-acquired immunodeficiency in myalgic encephalomyelitis—Is it present in long COVID?
2023, Journal of Translational Medicine